Philips - Luchtreiniger AC3220/10

I bought philips ac3220/10, no ozone

I would definitely avoid both Dyson and Shark-Ninja. Dyson has low particulate CADRs and a high price. Shark is mediocre quality and has very little capacity for gases, vapors, or odors. The Dyson Purifier Cool PC2 De-NOx may be good at reducing NOx and formaldehyde. However I don't know how well it reduces other gases *without* creating problematic unintentional byproducts. If you have high levels of particulates *and* gases/vapors/odors, you generally need two types of air purifier. This is because most common purifier brands have very little sorbent media for gases/vapors/odors. Instead, they're designed for particulates. Heavyweight sorbent media purifiers are very loud, very expensive, and clean the air more slowly than particulates-focused units. I would strongly recommend having air testing done with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. GC-MS would tell you which gaseous species are present. This is because plain/chemically untreated sorbent media do not have high removal capacities for all gaseous species. Some people have reported problems with plain sorbents, such as "sweet" smell emanating from the purifier or spikes on tVOC monitors despite a reduction in odors. Unfortunately I don't think you have loads of sorbent media purifier options in Turkey. The only ones may be the IQAir GC and GCX series purifiers. The GCX series purifiers would have the most sorbent media by weight. # Particulates I'll recommend particulates purifiers for now. For rooms measured in meters, Clean Air Delivery Rates (CADRs) should be 4-6 times a room's volume (in m^(3)) where higher pollution levels or people with allergies are present. Bedroom should have CADRs of 192 - 288 m^(3)/h. Living room/kitchen area should have CADRs of 288 - 432 m^(3)/h. For your bedroom, I would recommend either the Philips PureProtect 3200 Series (AC3220/10 model) or the Levoit Vital 200S. For the living room/kitchen area, I would recommend the Philips PureProtect 3200 Series (AC3220/10 model). Keep in mind particulate CADRs apply to the highest airflow speed/setting only. Lower settings have lower CADRs, which reduces cleaning effectiveness.

A bit late here, sorry! We need the ceiling height for room volume to determine Clean Air Delivery Rates (CADRs). Let's assume it's 2.4 meters high. For rooms measured in meters and persons with asthma/allergies, CADRs should be 4 to 6 times the room's volume in m^(3). 32.4 m^(2) × 2.4 m = 77.76 m^(3). 77.76 m^(3) × 4 to 6 = 312 to 467 m^(3)/h. You need 312 - 467 m^(3)/h CADRs. Because you have allergies, asthma, and live near a roadway, it would be best to oversize a bit. You could go with the [Philips PureProtect 3200 Series Smart Air Purifier](https://www.philips.com.au/c-p/AC3220_10/pureprotect-3200-series) as it has a top CADR of 520 m^(3)/h. But if I were you, I might spring for the [Philips PureProtect Pro 4200 Series Smart Air Purifier](https://www.philips.com.au/c-p/AC4221_11/pureprotect-pro-4200-series). It has a top CADR of 600 m^(3)/h. Keep in mind the CADRs listed for these purifiers apply to the highest airflow speed/setting only. Lower settings have lower CADRs which reduces cleaning effectiveness.

I’ve owned a few over the years. I find Philips ones are the best in terms of performance, running costs and filter life / replacement cost. Dyson are the worst. My current Philips has as much dust on the filter after a week than my Dyson one did in 6 months. This is the one I currently have - I found this at John Lewis & Partners. What do you think? https://www.johnlewis.com/philips-pureprotect-3200-series-ac3220-10-connected-air-purifier-white/p112585511?tmad=c&tmcampid=7&s_share=jlappios_Y29tLmFwcGxlLlVJS2l0LmFjdGl2aXR5LkNvcHlUb1Bhc3RlYm9hcmQ=