They are paid apps, but your TCO is less than a Garmin if you want something that gives you Siri/voice commands etc (by which I mean cost over 3/4 years inc purchase, apps and resale value).
Yes to HRV/VO2 etc. And much more.
WorkOutDoors is the other app you’ll need if navigating outdoors matters to you.
No argument from me - this is less seamless than Garmin’s all in one solution. I also won’t argue that the Ultra doesn’t go far enough to bridging the gap with Garmin in this regard.
Battery life is also a major factor. Hardcore adventurists need multi-day battery. 95% of users do not.
Upsides with AWU is of course, cell/data, seamless Apple integration, voice commands etc.
Your choice is determined by how much Garmin’s inbuilt solution matter to you vs how much you use /will lament Apple functionality.
FYI, I’m wearing my beloved Marq2 as I write this. I’m a total Garmin fanboy, but I’m also realistic about the AWU being a perfect solution for most people.
Garmin has to be one of the most stubborn refuse to change companies out there. I mean has anyone looked at their executive team lately. Bunch of clueless old guys that don’t appear to have any athletic ability anymore & never had any fashion sense. We ask for a whoop competitor & we get an index sleep monitor. However don’t worry we’ve released a screenless tracker for your horse. I’ve had a ton of Garmins over the years. Including multiple Marqs. Now because Garmin won’t listen to their customers I’ve moved over to Amazfit & Whoop(have had one for like 7 years) I’d gladly go back to Garmin if they would release what we’ve asked for, a proper screenless Whoop competitor. Garmin wake up already. Of course I’ll be checking out Polar’s offering next week. Hope they nail their band.
it was all about battery life for me. And in that case it's the garmin and not even close. I had a 1st gen Ultra and switched to the Marq with zero regrets.
B777X_787-9
