JVC - DLA-RS1200 / DLA-NZ500

I just did. 77” to 140” with jvc nz500 At first, the roof wasn’t black, but the side walls were - I was tremendously disappointed (and my setup isn’t entry level…) After doing the roof in black it has come a lot closer to what I was expecting, but it’s still not quite as good. One thing that sticks out - I had a black wall that the Oled was against, I could not tell where the tv ended in the dark, and I found it very immersive. You WILL NOT achieve that with a projector, no matter how much you spend.

Just a generic 1.1 gain 140” The jvc had better blacks than the epsom by a big margin when viewed back to back in the showroom. Also, as mentioned, it is much better now that the roof is black too.

I asked GPT a similar question, considering the Sony and the JVC options. GPT said the JVC was a better choice for its excellent blacks. I ordered the NZ500 and am waiting for it to be installed.

JVC first, Epson second, Sony 3rd. Kind of the way I would lean. You can get a native 4K JVC NZ500 projector with laser light source for that money. It's a decent upgrade on the 5040UB and makes a lot of sense in a good room. [https://www.jvc.com/usa/projectors/procision/dla-nz500/](https://www.jvc.com/usa/projectors/procision/dla-nz500/)

If you haven't, I would watch this video... [https://youtu.be/B4\_MhHsZvkU?si=p-knlak2qFaXRIo\_](https://youtu.be/B4_MhHsZvkU?si=p-knlak2qFaXRIo_) I would personally make strives to get the NZ500 from JVC over the other models. Black levels are extremely good and JVC continually comes out on top when compared head to head with Sony. Sony would absolutely be my second choice.

If you are just talking projector budget, and you have a proper surround sound system already, then I would go out of my way to figure out the JVC NZ500. It's a bit over budget, but it will serve you well for 10+ years as a killer projector. Otherwise, the LS12000 is a solid option there, but a long way from the JVC. The Sony XW5100ES is also close, and is a better choice than the Epson, but all of those models look quite good overall.

NZ500 first, Sony second, Epson LS12000 third. Then the BenQ models which will struggle with black levels. I'd likely get a Valerion over the JVC models at that price point. No question, I would always go for a JVC in a good theater.

If black levels ate important to you, andyou ate in a light controlled room JVC NZ500 is definitely on the top of your list.

I just replaced my 2012 JVC X-30 with the NZ500, and I'm loving it so far! I wish the fans were a tad quieter at full power but I'm in love with everything else.

The JVC nz500 is the best on your list for contrast and tone mapping. What size screen are you running? Do you have easy access to the HT for a BIG tv? I ask because we switched to a 98" miniLED tv, and we are very impressed. But not everyone can wrangle a big tv into their HT. Good luck.

We switched from a 120" wide scope screen and jvc rs640 with Lumagen and hdfury LLDV support to a tcl 98" qm851g calibrated by ChadB, and we have no regrets. The 98" is mounted on a rolling stand with 24" of variable vertical shift. The jvc rs640 had native contrast only recently equaled by the nz900. The calibrated miniLED surpassed the jvc in every way, despite the rs640 having the benefit of excellent Lumagen DTM and DV support of hdfury LLDV. An emissive tv in your dark theme HT will offer an incredible experience. There have been excellent suggestions for improving the epson ls12000 tone mapping, but the poor native contrast will forever impact fade to black and deep black and shadow detail performance. If you must stay with projection, maybe a move to a nz500 would offer a significant upgrade and the lowest cost and least hassle. Good luck with your choice.

None of the above... Try to find a good deal on a jvc nz500. It will offer very good built-in DTM and better native contrast for better deep black performance. Your other thread regarding a 98" miniLED would be the best and cheapest option if you can live with the screen size.

It’s your life and your money. Do whatever you want. But you’re asking the void for free advice. So IMO any TV screen would be a huge downgrade in immersiveness and audio quality in that room. If you want better image quality, get a better projector (and screen, if necessary). You’re apparently in the UK so options and prices may vary. But a JVC DLA-NZ500/ RS1200 is $7k. A Sony VPL-XW5000ES is $6k. I’d choose either one of them over the Epson. A $30 EZCOO SP12H2 HDMI splitter with custom firmware can unlock Dolby Vision capability, and with an AppleTV set to always output Dolby Vision, you would see a big improvement with a lot of streaming content. A custom gamma curve and other calibration tweaks will take it even further. I’m not familiar with BenQ projector and whether you can manually force that projector into an HDR compatible picture mode in BT.2020 color space. But maybe do your research and give it a shot if feasible. That might give you the ROI you’re looking for. https://www.avsforum.com/threads/alternative-devices-for-enabling-lldv-please-read-posts-1-2.3254266/#replies The next step up in price would be an HDFury device that might allow you to add the HDR info frame to automatically switch your BenQ into a HDR compatible picture mode to make the LLDV EDID trick work. https://www.avsforum.com/threads/dolby-vision-including-hdr10-conversion-w-dtm-on-projectors.3097934/#replies If the price of a new decent quality (albeit still entry level) 4K laser long throw projector is giving you heartburn, there’s always the used market. You could score a deal on a used Sony laser or JVC laser or JVC w/ bulb that will serve many people well at relatively low cost. https://www.avforums.com/forums/projector-projection-screen-classifieds.90/ https://www.avforums.com/threads/sony-xw5000es-laser-projector.2541005/ A used Lumagen Radiance Pro 4240 or 4242 could be found for a few grand that will give you excellent picture quality with 4K upscaling capability and DTM for all source devices and all content no matter whether SDR, HDR10, DV or HDR10+. There are still some caveats and limitations. But picture quality is generally not an issue unless you happen to be a 0.001% videophile type person for which only OLED will suffice and you’ll gladly sacrifice audio quality for it. https://www.avsforum.com/threads/new-lumagen-radiance-pro-series.2172017/#replies

People pay professionals good money to help them with answers to your questions. Equipment choice alone is barely half the equation. Good design and good integration are critical to achieving high performance. This isn’t something you should just freestyle, as there are many tradeoffs to manage based on your subjective preferences. Design informs equipment choice. It’s an iterative process as you converge on design and equipment choice simultaneously. Long throw projectors generally offer better image quality than UST at the same price point. UST are nice if you’re worried about people casting shadows or if this is a general entertainment space hosting karaoke night and dance parties. If it’s just for watching motion pictures while seated then get a long throw projector. For $5k I’d try to score a deal on a B-stock Sony VPL-XW5000ES or a lightly used JVC D-ILA projector, preferably with laser light source but if you’d rather spend less then a bulb is fine. You can find some screaming deals if you don’t mind bulbs and fake 4K pixel-shifting. If your viewing distance is >10ft then it shouldn’t matter. https://www.avsforum.com/forums/front-projector.252/ Fixed screens are cheaper than motorized screens. Acoustically transparent screens are nice because you can place the LCR speakers behind the screen, which not only looks better but sounds better. But this is also where you need to be careful as there is interaction between viewing angles/ screen size and speaker positions and seating distance. All have to be in harmony. Woven screens usually look and sound better than perforated screens, but this depends on the exact screen material, budget, viewing distance and preference. Like I said, there’s lots of tradeoffs to manage. I’d recommend minimum 7.1.4 speaker configuration, even if you have to built it in stages as funds allow. My preference in that size room is 9.1.6 but that’s going to break your budget in terms of AV processor capability, speaker count and amplification requirements. You’ll want a minimum of two subwoofers. What exactly do you mean by “sound conditioning is already taken care of?”

I say JVC (as an ls12000 owner!) you will get better black levels - if that’s important to you. I think from owning both the colours are slightly better on Epson. If you’re a gamer then the Epson does 120hz and the latency is below 20ms - no low latency on the JVC. But only you can judge which in the end. I got a very good deal on the Epson (£2k off) so it was a no brainier. Had that not been on, I’d have got JVC in a heartbeat. [NZ500 review](https://www.projectorcentral.com/JVC-NZ500-Projector-Review.htm) [LS12000 review](https://www.projectorcentral.com/Epson-Pro-Cinema-LS12000-Laser-Projector-Review.htm)

You can easily get into the NZ range for JVC for 8 grand. NZ500 is something like 6 grand and the NZ700 with its 80000:1 contrast claim is $9-something.

Oh no! Not the JVC! Oh the humanity! ... it's a great unit and nicely priced especially compared to that insanity of charging $8k for the Epson QB1000. Just pair it with a good screen. A nice retroreflective perhaps, Screen Innovations Slate? But not cheap.

I just ceiling mounted my nz500. It's the first projector I've owned so I have nothing to compare it to. But I really love it. Feel good man.

Most projectors don't do that, is that specialized to the JVC?

This JVC does not have 3D unfortunately.

Upgraded from a vivitek hk2288. I was pretty happy with the vivitek but was always wanting those deeper black levels. Man am I blown away with this jvc.

I went from a 65” C9 to NZ500 in a fully light controlled room with a 1.1 gain silver ticket 135” screen and it’s been great.  The colour is very good, blacks aren’t quite as good, but that’s to be expected. I’m pretty picky as a cinematographer and my wife used to be a colorist, neither of us have any complaints. One day I’ll calibrate it, but it’s so good that I’m in no hurry.  The only big thing for me and my current project is that the projector is a bit noisy for quiet scenes, that’s only if you’re in the back row though. 

I saw the Sony xw5100 in a showroom with a different gain screen so it’s not 1:1 but to my eye yes it was “brighter” at the expense of slightly worse but not by much color. Thats totally anecdotal though. And I also got a good deal on an open box but unused JVC so that could be biasing my eyeballs.

I keep my laser at 74 for HDR content and I’m pretty happy with it. They could be a touch quieter in very quiet scenes though. As you say, so in love with everything else that I don’t even care.

The jvc has a nice throw. I’ve got it about 170 inches back for a 150inch picture. It can go much farther back and zoom in.

I’m coming from an epson 5050ub and I prefer the lens shift on the jvc.

Jvc nz500 is what you want as the starting point. If you can spend more. Go nz700 or even nz800

what is your throw distance? my nz500 is at 14' and i swear it's almost not bright enough for my 125" screen

Just my experience, I have the NZ500 with the Seymour AV glacial white screen. Any type of light in the room affects the picture. I think a good ALR screen is needed for this. The 500 is great for dedicated home theater. I don't think it'll be bright enough for a living room daytime projector.

JVC NZ500. Best picture for the price, nothing will come close.

I got the nz500 couple months ago. Picture is stunning. Super sharp, contrast is amazing. As more reviews are coming out there is nothing else in that range that competes. It's a top tier projector with a low price. Highly recommend. You can get deals well below the 6k price tag. Your only downfall is the 4k60 for gaming. But non competitive it shouldn't be an issue.

I have the nz500 and it's amazing. I wouldn't suggest anything else, especially in a light controlled room for movies and TV. Sports look good on it as well.

The LS12000 shows $6100 on their website, the NZ500 can be bought for about 5500 OTD, but well see if that increases as well. I have the nz500 in a dedicated pitch black theater and the picture is stunning. Any ambient light definitely reflects on the screen and instantly ruins the picture. The 500 is going to be the best projector in that price range. Maybe you need to look into an ALR screen to help with any extra light.

JVC NZ800 is your only answer, especially for a 150" screen. If your doing 120" screen you can save more than half by getting the new JVC NZ500 or the NZ700 which are equally comparable to the 800. The only difference is no 3D, and less lumens and 8k e shift. So if you don't need the lumens for the bigger screen, don't care about 3d and the 8k is pointless as no content is 8k, save yourself $$ and get one of the other 2. I have the 500 and the picture is unbelievable.

That or the new NZ700 which is a few thousand under budget, which you then can have it properly calibrated. Great reviews coming out about this new line up. I have the NZ500 and it looks spectacular, can't imagine the 700 or 800.

I dont game on it so not worried about that, I watch football and some baseball and basketball on it and it isnt bad as far as motion. Now I do watch 4k blu rays, and it is absolutely stunning. I'm not sure if you have a local vendor, but a lot of dealers sell below msrp. I think you can get one now in the low to mid 5000 range. Reach out to a Mike Garrett at AV Science. He is out of NY. Very knowledgeable and can get you a deal. I would suggest having it calibrated, it makes a world of difference. If you don't live in Ohio area for Chad B, you can have it shipped to Kris Deering who does great work too.

Jvc nz500 or the nz700. Just came out, and lots of good things are being said about these projectors. If you set it up right, minimum throw distance, not too huge of a screen, the nz500 would be great and save you a couple thousand. You can take the savings and have it professionally calibrated, too, which is only about 400-600. I have the 500 and the picture quality is unbelievable, deep inky blacks, super sharp picture. Highly recommend it.

https://preview.redd.it/43cjdjzlc99f1.png?width=1897&format=png&auto=webp&s=fe881644f86b6f387f7fa8c6815caf311cd6e000 JVC NZ500 I also looked at the JVC NZ800 and the price difference was not worth the extra charge, honest opinion

At this price point i'd probably go for the JVC NZ500. If you want the Epson go with the LS12000 instead, 90% of the performance for 60% of the price

He's full of it. The LS12000 is HDMI 2.1 and would be much better for gaming since it handles motion better than the Sony does. Yes the black level is not as good but the Sony is not $5,000 better. If you want true 4k and better black levels than the Epson go with NZ500, which is still $3500 cheaper than his Sony.

Yes, an external video processor is the ultimate answer to the need for tone mapping but at added cost and system complexity. I'll admit that the 500 is certainly a very good value among the currently available projectors.

Don’t think you can go wrong with the NZ800. If I had the budget that’s what I’d go for! Just picked up my RS1200 (NZ500) today.

The JVC will overall look better than the Sony for HDR and has motorized everything, the Sony is cheaper and maybe has better imaging processing, but not tone mapping. It kind of comes down a bit of brand preference - I’m 100% a Sony guy for TVs and own 4 of them, but for projectors it seems JVC is at the top of their game right now. As a new owner of a RS1200/NZ500 with a 147” acoustically transparent 1.90:1 screen, it’s plenty bright _in a light controlled room_, and I’m blown away by the picture quality, consistency, and sharpness. I do agree with the other fellow that I’d wait until the room is ready before you pick. Then mount the projector before you select screen size.

I just ordered the JVC RS1200 (NZ500). I was struggling between that and the LS12000 and XW5000. In the end I was going to settle on the LS12000 for cost reasons (I personally would get zero benefit out of the QB1000) but last minute I decided the JVC was worth it for deep blacks, true 4K, being years newer, and having the best HDR processing in that class of projector.

Remember with the NZ700 the improved contrast is only available when reducing light output, and the improved colors is only available when using the color filter, which reduces light output and can’t be used in conjunction with improved contrast, and without the color filter the NZ500 actually has better colors. I personally feel like the NZ700 is a weird product with forced compromises to all its benefits, especially considering how much more money it is. I’d suggest stepping up to the NZ800, or settling on the NZ500. I personally settled on the RS1200 (NZ500) with a 147” 1.90:1 AT screen, and am very pleased with the brightness and performance.

Sweet! Wish I could have swung a NZ800, settled on a NZ500 (RS1200) with a 147” 1.90:1 screen. Also a Cinema 30 like you! Running 7.2.6.

I just sprang for the NZ500 today. Had been totally set on the LS12000, but…

Yeah, they’re good enough that in a light controlled room you don’t actually need a grey screen with it. Great projector! Obviously :)

I have a JVC NZ500 (2k lumens) and it's plenty bright at 150 inches in my light-controlled room. For $10k budget I'd step up to the NZ700 (2.3k lumens) and call it a day Make sure you're getting a proper screen. SilverTicket at the minimum but you'd be better served dropping $4k on a Stewart. I got a neutral gain grey to enhance the blacks and couldn't be happier. Paint the ceiling and wall tricorn black. I *highly* recommend just reaching out to the guys at projectorscreen.com and picking their brains. They're great to work with. /r/projectors https://www.projectorscreen.com/projector-screen-calculators?srsltid=AfmBOopmX0oIkelYr_tiJu_mdkKoQT2UslWfonpHUfo0Yk8D1Kd4LDBT

The NZ500 was $6k, but it's tariff-jumped to $6.5k. When I bought mine, I did a lot of research in the $4-$6k range. The NZ500 consistently performed better than similarly-priced competition in head-to-heads. My tier list for this bracket would be JVC NZ500 > Sony XW5000 ES > JVC NP5 > Valerion Max* > Epson LS12000 *Pure conjecture based on the performance of the Pro 2

https://www.projectorscreen.com/projector-screen-calculators?srsltid=AfmBOoqknYnwHYXTbA__wqQ5FqAiKDsrbaMEKp7WqttQzhEzIfWachTm Check out the FL calculator. I have an NZ500 in a blacked out room on 150” 16:9 and it’s plenty bright. I’ve actually tweaked brightness/laser power down. The NZ700 has better color and contrast but it’s not worth the price jump imo.

Order screen samples for your screen. Don’t go off of random advice. There is some subjectivity based off of your room, projector, and viewing distance. At your budget SilverTicket is the best option for screens. They’ll run about $500. You can get a pack of samples shipped for like $10. 133” is a weird choice. Just bump to 135” and you’ll have more screen options as that’s a standard size. 133” is not. At 135” THX recommended viewing angle is at 15.1 feet from the screen. If you’re going to be closer than that I’d play around with a viewing angle calculator and consider a 120”. If your budget is $6k, I’d stretch (or find a sale) for the JVC NZ500 which will outperform the Sony and Epson. If you’re strict at $6k, drop to the Epson only if you game a lot. Otherwise the Sony will be better. I’d also consider a Valerion in that range. The Max will be out soon and there are units available for cheap from Kickstarter backers who will sell for a profit but still less than retail. I’d honestly step up to a refurb x3800 from A4L ($1200). I’d buy 2 x RSL Speedwoofer 12s ($1600). That leaves you $3700 for speakers (and $6500 for pj/screen). I’d recommend Ascend Sierra-2EX V2s as L/R ($1698), 2EX V2 Center ($868) and Sierra-1 V2 as your surrounds ($998). If you save some money somewhere or decide to stretch budget get 4 overhead speakers. RSL CL-34 MKIIs are excellent and $150 each, so another $600 for all 4. You will be able to drive 5.2.4 with the x3800 Even in a pitch black room it’s worth painting the wall the screen is on and the ceiling black. I recommend Sherwin Williams Tricorn black (flat for the ceiling, matte for the wall).

Hey there, just found this thread and was wondering about the autocal. I just bought and installed my NZ500 and it looks great, but I’d like to learn how to calibrate it on my own and the autocal seems like a good starting point. I’ve read through the AVS thread about using non-spyder meters and see that’s recommended, but I didn’t know if it applied to the new models. The autocal on the NZ500 seems to be more robust, adjusting things like focus as well. Do you recommend the spyder or alternative meters?

I have owned projectors from all three brands at one time or another. Now that I've owned a JVC it would be pretty hard for me to settle on anything else. They are truly amazing.

Define "better"? Contrast, tone mapping for HDR, output, color, motion, 3d, 120hz for gaming, motion smoothing? (Hint: You can't get "the best" in all the categories in one projector under $10k but you can get the aspects that are important to you for much better prices if you define which things matter most.) Do you watch sports in the dark, or with some lights on? How big is your screen? What is the screen gain? (Or Brand and Model?) The LS9000 is going to have a little better image quality for sports and gaming. A little brighter, smoother motion. The JVC will be better for watching movies in the dark. Better contrast, much better HDR handling. It will be fine for sports and gaming.

The Sony won't be much of a step up. And it doesn't have automated lens shift and zoom which rules it out for 2.35 screens where you need that automated zoom to switch between 16x9 and 2.35:1 content. The JVC will have better contrast than the 9000 for sure. And better HDR than the other choices you mention including the 9000. Better color? All these choices can be calibrated to be very color accurate, so that is not a differentiator, ime. If you are unhappy with the color on the 9000, that is a setup issue, not a projector limitation. Changing projectors to one of these others is not the solution for color. That all said, the size and gain of your screen are pushing the limits of what this group of projectors can do. If I understand you correctly, that is a perforated screen, which is good for the gain. (If it were a woven screen, Id recommend looking at brighter projectors.) All that said, if you like motion interpolation for your sports, the JVC won't help you there, so that would be a hard pass.

Last winter I put two 8K 85 inch Samsung TVs in two multi-use rooms and an 8K projector in a dedicated room, 20 by 23 ft. with a 200 inch screen (about 8 by 14.4 ft viewable). One of the TVs faces a southern wall of glass so needs to be able to be bright. The measured contrast ratio for the Bravia 9 (XR90) is 3500: [https://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php?subaction=showfull&id=1728467405](https://www.flatpanelshd.com/review.php?subaction=showfull&id=1728467405) The native contrast ratio for the NZ500, a 4K JVC projector, is 40,000. The 8K projectors have native contrast ratios up to 150,000. They say it's an infinite ratio with local laser dimming. I sit 12-13 ft back right now which seems about right for 2.40 aspect ratio films but a little close for 1.78. I'm experimenting with inexpensive seating now to see how exactly I want to arrange the seating in the room before I buy god awful expensive theater seating. For me, a theater with a large screen is a qualitatively different experience than watching on a TV. The projector won't get as bright as the TVs but in a room where the light is controlled some scenes can be too bright with the whole wall lighting up. With an acoustically transparent screen the dialog can come from the screen/actors rather than below the screen.

If you're open to UST, the [awol vision pro](https://onlinehairguide.com/dp-B0CR13MB4F0) might be worth a look. It's not in every roundup, but it’s been getting attention for legit reasons. Triple laser (no color wheel), dolby vision and atmos support, plus it doubles as a center channel speaker, which is kind of wild. The built-in audio’s actually usable, especially if you don’t have a full surround setup yet. Picture quality holds up really well even in brighter rooms (paired with their ALR screen), and it’s also 3D-capable if you’re into that. One underrated thing: power usage is super low compared to traditional projectors, which helps if you’re planning to run it often. That said, if you’re sticking with long-throw and care more about black levels or want that JVC tone mapping magic, the nz500 still has a strong edge in dedicated dark rooms. Just depends on your space and whether you’re leaning cinematic or convenience.

What size is your room? It appears they priced this like a car dealership being told to price a sports car. It's a vague request without knowing what you may want or need. This isn't an insult in anyway. Just that you have to be a little specific. A lot of what is listed is overkill. 1. The projector, while nice, can probably be substituted by a nice, but cheaper JVC NZ500 or even Epson LS1200. There are others to mention here, but for half the price of the Sony listed you will get an excellent projector. 2. You need to find out what screen is being used. I really hope that's a Stewart or SI screen for that price. Screen type and material are debatable, so I will say that you could still probably save some money with the screen. 3. The HDMI cable is AudioQuest and it's overpriced. I have purchased fiber HDMI cables from Amazon for a 35ft run and they are flawless. Don't believe the snake oil that's out there about cables. It's a rabbit hole. 4. The remote and controller system is over the top. In reality, it's "nice", but not necessary. With smart apps, you can control lights, devices, etc. from your phone. You can even setup actions with Alexa or Google. 5. I would like to know the speaker brands. The cost and type of speaker can vary greatly. Just putting down generic names makes me think these guys are selling you bulk speakers for large profit margins. These are probably MSRP Klipsch speakers, and the SUB is probably an SVS PB1000PRO. I have more concerns about inwalls for your LCR, but that is deviating from the topic at hand. 6. Line item 15 is an overpriced cable. You can get a high-quality cable for half that. Refer to number 3. 7. Line item 16 is another overpriced cable. A horribly overpriced cable. Refer to number 3. 8. High quality projector mounts are needed for expensive projectors (weight, ability to micro adjust). However, you need to know what brand and model they use. These mounts can usually be found for half off on eBay. I bought a peerless mount for my HT 2 years ago used. It's a $150 plus dollar mount that I got for $40. 9. Lastly, that warranty is overpriced. The devices and speakers already have warranties. While this warranty is 5 years, Im wondering what it covers? The labor is subjective. I can't speak to your room dynamics when it comes to setting up, pulling cable, calibration etc. There is a lot of unnecessary money being spent in the items I listed.

If budget is not the primary concern, I highly recommend the JVC NZ series. Image is razor sharp, blacks are deepest you ca get in a projector. I have the NZ500 it’s *amazing*, and I do my fair share of gaming on it. Might also want to consider nz700 and nz800. And yes they are easy to set up and the higher you go on their range the less dark of a room is needed. I’ve seen the NZ900 is all daylight and it just works.

My room is 10x20. I have a DIY wall to wall acoustic transparent screen. Front speakers and equipment go behind it. I have 7.1.6 and it’s amazing. Even if you don’t go all the way form the begging it’s probably worth it to wire for 7.2.6. In the 3/5k range IMHO the JVC NZ500 is the best projector (got mine for 4.5k last Black Friday YMMV this year after tarrifs hit). For the AVR I recommend the best Denon that fits your speaker needs / budget: 3800 / 4800 / 6800 / maybe all the way to A10H (?).

I have the Sony but if I were buying right now I would get the JVC. The comparable JVC at the time was still bulb based. I love the Sony so no regrets really…

NZ500 is easily the best projector out there for movies and shows. Honestly, nothing can come close to touching it for the price. It easily beats 20k projectors from just a few years ago. If you need to game then it may not be the best but other than that it's fantastic

The nz500 is as solid as it gets for the price and will have better black levels than the ls900 for sure. What specifically were you hoping to have improved over the ls9000? I have all three of those options in our showroom (as well as many others) and happy to get into details with you about the options; feel free to DM me.

Both the Sony and the JVC will be better than the Epson for this purpose. Between the Sony and JVC it will come down to if you ever plan on having some lights on for more casual viewing; do you plan on gaming and do you want 3d. Happy to get into real detail with you, shoot me a DM

Well, someone just brought theirs in last week to compare next to the NZ500 and ended up buying an NZ500, so.....

The JVC Nz500, NZ700, would be my top two suggestions at under $10k, but the Epson qb1000 is surprisingly good as well. Where are you located? We have several options in the $5k-$10k range in our showroom in NJ at ProjectorScreen.com. Happy to get into the details with you if interested and even help subsidize some of your travel expense if you decide to check them out in person at our showroom and make a purchase. Feel free to shoot me a DM

I have a NZ500 projecting on to a 150" AT screen in a 20x25 fully light controlled room. I think it looks really good. That said, more lumens would be great. I'm not willing to spend NZ900 money. I have a Valerion Max on preorder to compare it to. At 3500 lumens vs 2000 and even HTGuru giving it strong accolades, I want to see how it performs myself. So an option to think about at $4k.

Absolutely love the JVC. Have had it for about 3 months now and I’m still in awe of how good it looks on my 143” screen. Bright, detailed, beautiful rich colors, and it has this picture clarity that’s hard to describe.

I’m looking forward to my JVC NZ500 and 120” screen in a dedicated HT space. Change my mind why an 83”OLED is a better idea…

That seems crazy. My NZ500 at 74% laser power is plenty more than bright enough on my 142" screen. I am getting like 130 nits at 74 laser on my screen. My previous projector was a NX5 and after 1000 hours on the lamp I was getting about 75 nits on the screen which was still enough.

The only downside of the nz500 is that it will spoil your perception of home theater projector image quality and black levels and you will never be able to go with another brand in the future lol

It’s not really anecdote. It’s measured performance. The NZ500 has over twice the native contrast of the Sony 5100. Not saying that means it looks twice as good of course, but definitely enough to be noticeable.

If you're interested in closing all the shades and turning off the lights, get the JVC NZ500. Yes, I know it's never pitch dark in NYC, but this is close enough that I would say the JVC is worth it. BTW, buy your projector **ASAP**. Epson is **increasing their prices by 24%** very soon. The new pricing is already live on their website: https://epson.com/For-Home/Projectors/Pro-Cinema/Pro-Cinema-LS12000-4K-PRO-UHD-Laser-Projector/p/V11HA47020MB It is still $5K for now at Best Buy and other retailers, but that will be changing any day this week: https://www.bestbuy.com/site/epson-pro-cinema-ls12000-laser-projector/6495340.p?skuId=6495340 JVC will probably follow suit soon. **The tariff pricing is coming for everything.** If you are on the fence about any purchase and you have the cash to spend, just buy it ***right now.*** You can always return it next week if you change your mind.

That 15% light output difference is not going to be enough to easily notice. You generally need a much more substantial lumen difference than that in order to translate to a human perceived difference. The NZ500 and NZ800 are the price-to-performance sweetspots in JVC's current line up. The JVC NZ700 also has the DCI Cinema Filter feature that produces slightly more accurate color when you enable it. The JVC NZ500 doesn't have that. But I don't know any JVC owners who actually use that filter option. You get very slightly more accurate color at the expense of a massive brightness hit.

Agreed, if you have full light control over your room, and your screen size is 135" or less, then I would lean toward saving the $3K and getting the JVC NZ500. And then spend $500-1000 on a professional calibration. If your screen is larger than 135", then I strongly think you need the additional lumens that the NZ700 can put out.

Wait am i dumb? The nz500 doesn’t do 4k@120. It can only do 4k@60. https://www.jvc.com/content/dam/jvc/global/projector/documents/NZ_Main_Features_MF-nz9480.pdf

This guy knows projectors - this list is solid -- Epson 5050ub, Epson LS1200, JVC NZ500 are generally accepted as the standout winners at their respective price ranges- (with an emphasis on preference for high contrast performance)

If you're open to UST, the [awol vision pro](https://onlinehairguide.com/dp-B0CR13MB4F0) might be worth a look. It's not in every roundup, but it’s been getting attention for legit reasons. Triple laser (no color wheel), dolby vision and atmos support, plus it doubles as a center channel speaker, which is kind of wild. The built-in audio’s actually usable, especially if you don’t have a full surround setup yet. Picture quality holds up really well even in brighter rooms (paired with their ALR screen), and it’s also 3D-capable if you’re into that. One underrated thing: power usage is super low compared to traditional projectors, which helps if you’re planning to run it often. That said, if you’re sticking with long-throw and care more about black levels or want that JVC tone mapping magic, the nz500 still has a strong edge in dedicated dark rooms. Just depends on your space and whether you’re leaning cinematic or convenience.

The Sony is the only one that comes in a white case. Otherwise, JVC is the clear contrast winner and best all-in-one hdr dynamic tone mapper. If you want a hit on contrast for more brightness, Sony. If you want even more of a hit on contrast for a lot of brightness, go Epson.

If you're looking at. Projector in a light controlled room with that size budget, I'd say look at the Epson QB3000 or the JVC NZ500/700, both meet your throw and budget requirements if you're in the states. I've had Epson before and they are solid projectors. The JVC has great black levels and the Epson is brighter if you think you'll need it. I have found larger TVs to have some artifacts in their imagery and unless newer TV's have found a way round that I think a projector can still work. I have a 96inch screen and feel a projector was worth it. If my projector was to die today, the two mentioned projectors are where I'd personally be looking.

JVC and Sony are the only native 4K options under $100K. Sony is by far the best for gaming with a sub 12ms input lag and excellent all round performance. The JVC can be better for Blu-ray, especially if you’re hiring a 1st class calibrator. However, I find most prefer the well rounded performance of the Sony. The new Bravia 7 (XW5100) has become my favorite bang for the buck projector.

Nope. You can get a native 4k jvc for 6k

Black level champ, it's lcos jvc.