KZ - PRX

I hate KZ, but i was told to try the PRX, and they synergize amazingly well with my Retro Nano So i have the cheapo setup which is the retro nano with KZ PRX and the expensive setup which is the Aful P7 with the BTR17. really amazing what you can get for 50 bucks today.

Did you try to eq the PRX? i've read a lot comments that planars are easy to eq and that make the prx an even greater value for a first planar. For example in here [https://www.reddit.com/r/iems/comments/1i6i1mc/kz\_prx\_are\_here\_slightly\_disappointed/](https://www.reddit.com/r/iems/comments/1i6i1mc/kz_prx_are_here_slightly_disappointed/) . When i get some time i'll try to play with the eq. I got the PRX for $18 (anniver Aliexpress sale) and i came from a KZ castor bass like OP and yes you can clearly note the difference in bass. I use the PRX with an Onix Alpha Xl1 and it sounds great.

I was just curious, i love my PRX but i paid the half during Aliex anniversary

I think I prefer KZ Zenith compared to PRX... there is something with PRX sound that I do not quite like.. hard to pin point to what it is. KZ PRX is detailed but somehow I dun quite like it as much. And you definitely need to use a more powerful source to run it like balanced output from a DAC AMP, I mean you can use 3.5mm if it provides enough power. My favorite IEM is still CCA Hydro.

In pr series, prx

Yeah considering the price.

Saga is really literally worth every coin. It's musicality is truly amazing. Prx, castor pro are also one of the most competitive iem for price.

I've got both. To be honest, KZ PRX are better in technicalities, but they do have that planar "timbre", and the ARTTI T10 are better for me due to that slight bump in the 1-3kHz region. Oh, and the accessories.

If you’re already set on the Hydro (great choice, btw), between the PRX and EW300, I’d personally go with the **EW300**—fantastic tuning and detail for the price. PRX is solid but leans a bit more into that classic KZ V-shape, whereas the EW300 is more refined and balanced. As for **DSP vs. non-DSP**, if you're using a good DAC/AMP or want more flexibility, go for the **non-DSP** version. But if you're plugging straight into a phone or laptop and want a clean, optimized sound without worrying about extra gear, DSP is a great plug-and-play option. What kind of music do you mostly listen to?

I use kz prx it has nice bass. The explosions sound big and the vr enhances the experience and I play games with dolby atmos enabled so the sound became somewhat 3d But since then i upgraded to a sony ier z1r and looking forward to get Fatfreq Grand Maestro after I have enough extra cash

Prx has nice bass and staging and I just plug it into the headphones jack of pc. Prx so good I got rid of my other cheap IEMs. It's similar to my experience with Hidizs mp145 but prx has stronger sub bass rumble and I love it

Planars would be a great upgrade, I have the Zero 2 and Zero Reds as well. Just scored a KZ PRX and they are just fantastic, blowing away the Zeros. So much better clarity and detail, but not lacking in bass either. Beautiful open presentation, heavenly tunes! But they're hard to drive though, I'm currently not portable, using a THX 789, sometimes kicking into high gain. But my DAP can't power them directly, have to use my portable amp that puts out a watt, which it sounds fine on.

My other IEMs are the Hidizs MP145, KZ PRX and ZAR, Rosefinch, Zero Red, Zero 2, and ancient Ety ER4S. I mostly just listen to the Punch, MP145 and ZAR for portable. I love classic rock the most like Grateful Dead, Steely Dan, Beatles, Dylan, Zeppelin, etc. But I listen to everything, love classical and jazz, and EDM and Hip-hop and bassy pop, soul.

The EW300 would be a solid choice. But I would look at inefficient planars which you're able to drive. I have the KZ PRX, sensitivity is pretty low but when driven properly is awesome.

Kz ZVX Pro or PRX for a planar, these are simply brilliant sets. Stomp all over Cadenza.

I have been really enjoying my KZ PRX, clarity is amazing, bass performance is ridiculous but not overpowering or muddy, [$44 on aliexpress](https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005007900337955.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.main.7.76bcffxhffxhol&algo_pvid=279e10a8-de76-4ed9-a4cb-b625d5cba18a&algo_exp_id=279e10a8-de76-4ed9-a4cb-b625d5cba18a-6&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%22176%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%7D&pdp_npi=4%40dis%21CAD%2180.33%2143.38%21%21%21398.09%21214.97%21%402103273e17415641138017130e7c41%2112000042770157149%21sea%21CA%216007678746%21X&curPageLogUid=QE14pGXbZICd&utparam-url=scene%3Asearch%7Cquery_from%3A) so I figured I might as well try them out and they have not disappointed. They do like power though, so you might be maxing out your volume

kz prx is similar to s14 in performance, so price/perf u get prx.

Some may differ, but my two Planar IEMs, my KZ PRX and SGOR Luna sound much better. Better tuning and precision. But, these are power hungry af.

I have a few bassy IEMs. Namely my Rosefinch and the very cheap QKZ ZXT. But I am starting to like the amount of bass my EDC Pro has. It's bassy, but not anywhere near a true basshead IEM level. Even the PRX's bass is growing on me. It's funny that I started my journey into IEMs two months ago as a basshead. The more bass, the better. But over two months, finding myself wanting a more neutral sound, or at least a relaxed V shape. Even in my Subaru with the good sound system, I find myself turning the bass down now. Let me evolve a bit before choosing another.

I think the KB02 is a good entry point to bone conduction. Effectiveness of the tech seems to vary from person to person and the low price would be a good way to understand if you would prefer to get higher end BC like the DMAs or a multi hybrid set like the Supermix 4. You might even be happy with the KB02, ultra budget sets can be very surprising. I was using a set of borrowed Supermix 4 for gaming (excellent btw) when I added KZ PRX planars to an order just to bump my total up to the next coupon tier. I returned the Supermix because the cheap PRX set (on a 4.4 balanced cable with a good source) sounded better to my ear for gaming and music. A tuning which matches your personal sound preferences can trump a technically better IEM.

KZ PRX are similar to ARTTI T10 and they cost around 35$

So not had much time and I only have the previous PR3 in the series to compare it to. It seems the reviews have stated that they have reigned the treble in a little and I can confirm it definitely has. The PR3 had some very sharp sibilance with some vocals. It was sometimes difficult to listen to certain tracks due to the S’s and T’s feeling like needles in my ear. The PRX has reigned that in a little bit. Now most budget planars can suffer from sibilance, (it seems like the nature of the beast) but this one definitely has some restraint and it’s no longer difficult to listen to some of my catalogue. There’s still a bit of sharpness but it doesn’t peak and it has that signature metallic tone planars are known for. Sparkly for sure. But with the treble more controlled it means the bass can take over a little bit more, this gives this iem a little more warmth than the PR3. It’s not stupidly boomy but it will satisfy most edm nuts. Low end is tight and it has some good slam. Mids are as expected, good presence but bass and treble still push it back a little more but it’s definitely not an agressive V shape. Now that doesn’t mean the PR3 is now a dead product by any means. It’s still stronger when it comes to certain genres. I still recommend the PR3 for music that focuses less on vocals and/or no vocals. The sharp sparkly sound sig works amazing for classical and music soundtracks by the likes of John Williams and Danny Elfman but I could never recommend it as an all-rounder. The PRX on the other hand I could say it’s a good one and done budget planar. I also have the salnotes dioko and artti t10 (aswell as the PR3 and now PRX) of all 4 I’d say this is creeping very close to the T10 (my favourite). Currently I paid £36.29 for the PRX and I paid £46.50 for the T10 and thats a tad close for me to outwardly say the PRX is a total winner for the price but if this comes down in price a little bit more (£30 or a little less) I’d say the PRX is a definite recommendation. Still, if you have less that £40 and can’t stretch that little further then YES PRX is a banger iem.

Smart move, like I said the PR3 has it’s strengths but the sibilant vocals and it’s cold signature don’t make them good all rounders. But I’m currently listening to ACDC thunderstruck with the volume up to around 80% and I loving it PRX. The PR3 can barely make it past 50% before they become really nastly and sharp. But if you put these next to the T10 then the T10 are walking away with the medal everytime.

SGOR Luna looks really good from what I can tell, just be advised that planar bass is different from regular dynamic driver bass, sometimes it can be missing some rumble and punch but it’s faster than DD bass and has more “slam” to it. I have the KZ PRX that’s very similar to the Luna and that’s my experience. If you would rather have the classic DD experience my recs are Inawaken Dawn Ms and KZ castor pro bass (more mid bass punch) or KZ Saga bass (more sub bass rumble)

great review, i have the prx and i pretty much agree with almost everything, indeed the prx is a great planar set, the only downsides is it being harder to drive and the cymbals sometimes sounds washy and have unnatural decay, i also did notice that i have some driver flex in my right side unit, did you experience any driver flex or pressure issues with your set ?

I use Kz PRX. Pretty nice.

Amazing iems. Only issue is my silicon tips don't fully fit to my ears so I bleed sound and bass in public. Which is not a fault of the iem. Sound quality is like water. I sold one to a local musician and he later said it's quality is nearly matching 800 usd professional grade studio equipment. I think KZ did a good job there. There is actually a soundstage. Crazy stuff

(most) Planar can't compete in bass with dd's. If you like sub bass rumble then planar is a bad choice. I have PRX and Rhapsody. Rhapsody wins hands down. Better quality and quantity. They also have nice [vocals.No](http://vocals.No) piercing or shouty heights,no metalic sound. You need short stem ear tips for them or you get ear canal pain.I Shorted the stock ones and magic.6,7-10 hours easy.

Yes,i saw that post and i eq them.They just cant compete with a decent dd like Rhapsody in terms of bass rumble. Rhapsody outperform them easy.Thx for reply tho. ( similar price )

Nice collection. Any U shaped tuning Iem recommendation? I really like the KZ PRX,except the planar bass. I keep mine at +8/9 db in subbass/bass region.But there is little to no rumble.PRX would be perfect with more rumble and impact. Any recommendations for a basshead iem( but without sacrificing mids and heights )

I have artti t10 and kz prx, in my opinion the prxs sound better.

The PRX is the best of the PR series, with the tuning of the Letshuoer S12 with a 13.2 mm driver

Well, they are not deceived me. \ Posted in my Tidal>Shanling UA mini>KZ PRX \ Enjoying planar goodness, but well, you can keep beating a dead horse, and KZ keep doing successful launches 👌🏼. I couldn't care less about false morality and past problems, I'm just a consumer, not a judge.

Budget planars actually have a DD like bass and no noticeable planar timbre, your friend can go fine with the Sgor Luna, Artti T10 and KZ PRX, all of those offers an enjoyment other kind of iems for the same price usually don't. For the Luna and PRX you can just cable rolling, a cheap FiiO KA11 dongle dac does the job done for driving those bad boys, and of course eartips fitted for your friend liking, anyways my choice is trn t eartips, offering me the best bast and soundstage with those macro and microdetails i love. And being just 1 driver, takes eq like a champ so your friend can experiment with the tuning he likes the most, for me is the HBB target, and other targets are fine. Other redditors are talking about the Luna, I'm glad those iems having the attention and recognition it deserves.

I have both Luna and PRX, yes, the PRX have a smaller shell, but is kind of the same drivers (i don't know if it is the case) just different tunings. Awesome iems ngl.

I have driver flex on both PR2 and PRX, really depends on tips.

Imo edc pro, cca hydro, kz prx and kz zenith

i would 100% recommend the kb02, it’s super cheap and so worth the money, i actually have them in right now haha ive tried the s12 2024 and the kz prx, so not that many, but the aether definitely cuts down on the planar sharpness that’s signature of the other two

Just received my PRX---previously used PR1 Pro. I'm not expert or anything and kind of an amateur enthusiast so I'll try to describe my experience with them by comparing them against each other to the various songs. So far I think the term would be that the PR1 Pro is more bright and the PRX is more warm. Device: HiBy R5-i. Balanced 4.4. new same cheapo foam tips on both sized S. No EQ. Same cable. Gain: low. 100% volume for maximum ear damage. Methodology: listen a few times and swap just iems. Compare segments of songs where I think I hear the most differences between the 2. song: Fleetwood Mac - Dreams (2001 remaster 96.0khz/24bits FLAC). Immediately off the bat the PR1 Pro in general sounds louder. The clang of cymbals at the start hit at a higher frequency. Vocals are a bit more shouty as well. The timbre I guess you can say is less fatiguing on the PRX. Soundstage of the PRX feels more wide and isolation of sounds and vocals is a bit more noticeable to me on the PRX than the PR1 Pros. song: Kali Uchis - Telapatia (acoustic) (44.1khz/24 bits FLAC) Once again right off the bat everything on the PR1 Pro is louder. First notes in the guitar string hits differently... not sure how to describe it but it just does? lol Certain notes and sounds seem to linger slightly longer on the PR1 Pro. Sibilance on the PR1 Pro on Telapatia is also more noticeable to me. Song: Kendrick Lamar - Squabble Up (48.0khz/24bits FLAC) Once again immediately louder on the PR1 Pro. Vocals are more shouty as they were with Rumours compared to the PRX. I'm not sure how to describe all these bass thumps but the way they're hitting is different. To me on the PRX the bass in general sounds more "clean". Contrasting the vocals to the bass it doesn't really flow well together. The treble is a tad too high and doesn't blend well on the PR1 Pro. There are also literal shouting sections in Squabble Up and they're borderline piercing on the PR1 Pro (something I never noticed before until testing them against the PRX). Song: Porter Robinson & Madeon - Shelter (44.1khz/16 bits FLAC) Once again everything is just louder on the PR1 Pro. In fact, after listening to this song with the PRX it's almost unbearable on the PR1 Pro---something I never noticed before. Because everything is just louder it gets a little over-bearing. It's not muddy per-se. It's just that on some songs the PR1 Pro is just too much noise all at once because it is louder. It's very evident on Shelter every time song builds up it's momentum. Near the end of the song it's where the song gets very energetic and the PR1 Pro takes the energy of that song and cranks it up to 11. Song: Billie Eilish - Ocean Eyes (44.1khz/16 bits FLAC) There's some lingering notes and bass seems to hang around a bit longer on the PR1 Pro compared to the PRX. Sibilance also hangs on just a smidge longer on the PR1 Pro. Some vocal notes on the PR1 Pro are a bit sharper than on the PRX. === Overall they're actually quite different from one another. I think there will be times the PR1 Pro will stand out due to it's brighter sound signature but overall the PRX is a much better listen. It's much more balanced across the board. Just looked at KZ's supplied graphs on their site and yeah---almost all frequencies on the PRX is lower than the PR1 Pro which would explain why the PR1 Pro is overall just louder, brighter and a tad shouty. I'm definitely pleased with the PRX but may hang onto the PR1 Pro as backup or when I want to focus more on vocals at a lower volume. I spent several hours listening to them and then comparing the two. Compared it with more songs but reddit didn't let me post the comment (too long I guess lol)

Doing my best to remember what I'm hearing as more time is lost between swapping IEMs and comparing them at 100 and 80% volume. That said in Fleetwood Mac - Dream the vocals are more forward but not as harsh with the PR1 Pros at 80%. The PR1 Pro at a lower volume still sounds a bit more bright and energetic than the PRX at a higher volume. The tonality in the vocals is different in the PR1 Pro even at the lower volume. I would say the PRX is much more similar to my desktop set-up. In Porter Robinson & Madeon - Shelter the same pretty much applies. The song has a much more energy in the PR1 Pro even at a lower volume. Things are more still more forward even at 80% vs 100% PRX. The song is much easier to listen to at 80% than it was at 100%. The natural energetic sessions at the end of the song are bearable where at 100% PR1 Pro I mentioned there was just too much going on at once. But, with the PRX there's still better separation. I don't recommend listening to IEMs at 100% often. Which explains why I never noticed some of the "issues" with the PR1 Pro until last night. From low to medium-high the PR1 Pro is very pleasant to listen to. Bright, fun and energetic. The PRX at all volumes is quite the opposite. More relaxed/calm, warmer and I'm assuming more natural (since as mentioned it's closer to my desktop setup than the PR1 Pros). The PRX at all volumes blends everything together really well. PRX handles sounds better across all volume ranges.

Arrti T10 is by far the best value, nothing beats it at its price. I bought a whole bunch of planars to see if I was missing out (planning to return the ones I don't keep) Kz PRX- pretty good, t10 is better Letshuoer S08- Great, trades blows with T10 but 2x the cost Kiwi Ears Aether- the best, but absolutely not 3x better. Hifiman Edition XS (Yeah I wanted to see what a planar headphone was like) Absolutely amazing for live music/ real instruments. Not so great for hip hop etc.

Listening on my PRX's right now. Give it a nice amp and those things seriously rival $400 iems in some areas. Such a good driver!

SGOR Luna might be better abit terms of warmness, but the PRX might have more details and sparkles

PRX will have abit more treble details most likely SGOR Luna is a warmer set, but still has details

TL;DR for those short on time or not inclined to read the entire review (tables are broken so I am using an easy paragraph with Pros and Cons until someone fixes it): **PROS**: * Very good technical performance and resolution and solid timbre for a cheap planar set * Weighty bass response while maintaining good speed in fast basslines * Good end to end extension for a planar set without becoming fatiguing up top * Scales well with power and doesn’t distort at higher volumes * Comfortable and well built shells **CONS**: * The low-end is weighty and thick but it’s evident that it’s a typical planar bass response * Hard to drive * The cable looks and feels cheap \---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Introduction KZ needs no introduction, and their PR series is no exception since we all know that it’s their planar series. After many other versions such as the PR1, PR1 HiFi, PR1 Pro, PR2 x HBB (with all the drama related to the mesh and no mesh versions, the tuning change and so on), PR3 and bla bla, the PRX comes as another version featuring a planar driver. Let’s see how it performs and how it compares against similar products. >*Disclaimer: the KZ PRX were sent to me by KZ so that I could write an honest review. This review represents my personal opinion on the set, it isn't promotional or paid content and I don’t get any revenue from the sales of this product. At the time of the review, the KZ PRX were on sale for about 50$ at Aliexpress.* https://preview.redd.it/9gfqsio7o86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ec83552b551deb5fc0b802bbb7b95a4e9434b883 # Technical Specifications * Driver Configuration → 1 x Planar Driver (should be a 13.2mm unit) * Impedance → 15 Ω * Spec-sheet Frequency Response → 20Hz-40kHz  * Nozzle Diameter (widest point) →  6mm * Sensitivity → 94 dB * Cable → 1.25m detachable copper cable with 0.75mm 2-PIN QDC connectors * Plug Type → 3.5mm # Packaging The packaging of the KZ PRX is identical to every other KZ box. It’s a very simple and small cardboard and contains: * The KZ PRX * The detachable cable * One set of starline tips (S, M, L sizes) * One pair of foam tips * User manual https://preview.redd.it/2knwfrzbo86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b3c17921ebdd47d530189d0a12ddd0dcacf61a62 https://preview.redd.it/ausluqzbo86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=64b5aabbad6d997018c77792490d10fbac94e3b2 https://preview.redd.it/elfkf96eo86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f89a90a11b0a5ef535d1002c85c9a5fd137de21d # Design, Build Quality, Comfort and Isolation The design of the PRX is not really unique since the PR series always had this kind of design, but it’s a design that works and that I find pretty good-looking. The build quality is pretty nice, with resin being the star of the show when it comes to the shell’s material. The faceplate looks like it’s made of aluminum but something tells me it could be a painted plastic faceplate. In any case, the build quality is pretty good, no particular complaints here. Comfort is very good, isolation is average and in fact I prefer using these at home (probably, and I say probably, the faceplate is truly semi-open but I am not sure about it). https://preview.redd.it/fmkkpjoio86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=63363da8907b7c5fcadc8ca2fc191c7022822256 https://preview.redd.it/l7i1rhoio86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=18ed88dd0c0adac46394128b0e8482904b454a2a https://preview.redd.it/1jzkc7uko86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=735ba028a44d30f10e294b3f419023fdaa69150f https://preview.redd.it/besr18uko86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8a3d5f46aacef534a25224ab49f468f96d41aa79 # Cable KZ has to upgrade their stock cables. This is just another cheap cable from KZ and there’s nothing “positive” I can say about it since other brands include better cables on average. The QDC connector isn’t a favorite of mine either. No more excuses KZ, it’s time to act. https://preview.redd.it/4ybp1jfro86e1.jpg?width=1500&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e254ef5031f20038732ad92f91a32ba303eb12e5 # Sound **GEAR USED FOR THE TEST** * DAC: Topping E30  * AMP: Topping L30, Fiio A3 * Mobile phones: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge, Xiaomi Mi A3, Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra * Moondrop May’s DSP cable with PEQ=0 * Dongle: Apple Type-C dongle, Fosi DS2 * Portable DAPs: Benjie S8/AGPTEK M30B * Bluetooth Adapters: KBEAR S1, KZ AZ10  * Other sources: Presonus AudioBox iONE, Elgato Wave XLR **Amplifier needed?** Some amplification is strongly recommended since the PRX doesn’t sport a very efficient planar driver and some power is gonna help. I really suggest picking up a cheap type-c dongle DAC at least since weak sources will give you low volume and could probably lead to disappointing performance overall. **Let’s speak about the sound.** The KZ PRX sound great, and it’s pretty much it. Timbre is fairly natural for a planar set, even though there’s still some planar timbre, especially in the upper registers and in the bass presentation. The low-end is emphasized on the PRX and this gives more weight to the left part of the frequency range, providing for a controlled yet speedy low-end that not only can keep up with fast tracks but that can also sound “natural”. In fact, planar drivers usually have a less natural bass response if not very boosted or heavily damped, but KZ managed to strike a great balance between note weight and speed that is super satisfying, also thanks to the sub-bass focus. Male vocals have a nice sense of warmth and are slightly influenced by the low-end emphasis, followed by gentle and intimate female vocals. The latter aren’t hot, they are never sibilant, and even though not the star of the show they are never left behind, which is another win-win situation for KZ. The upper-midrange is, in fact, surprisingly smooth. What about the treble? Well, the treble has some sparkle up top and the overall detail retrieval and resolution is above average for the price, but it’s far from being as fatiguing as on other KZ planar sets. For sure the PRX are not ideal for treble sensitive folks, but those those who will decide to grab a pair of these will be rewarded with a surprisingly technical yet controlled treble (which is hard to believe considering previous planar sets from KZ, but trust me).  The technical performance is very good for the price, with a pretty wide stage and precise imaging. Soundstage depth and height are average for the price, but the overall technical performance is definitely above average for an under 50$ planar set.  **Are they something I would use considering my taste and preferences?** Yes. The low-end is rich enough to enjoy some proper dubstep and drum ‘n bass, and the technical performance is very good too so I can also play some games with these and having proper pinpointing. I have been using the PRX since when I have received them and it’s a set that I would pick up for sure (and that I will recommend, at least until a better version comes up). # Some comparisons: **KZ PRX vs KZ x HBB PR2**  >I’ll be very brief with this comparison: the PRX sound better under every aspect.The PR2 have just a touch more details, but with a much more annoying and fatiguing treble. The PRX have better technical performance overall, better note weight, superior timbre, a more spacious soundstage, a much more natural vocal reproduction and it’s tuned in a better way in general. Cable, comfort, isolation and packaging are identical.Just skip the old PR2 and go for the PRX hands down: the latter are harder to drive but they will reward you. **KZ PRX vs SGOR Luna** >These are not very different and in fact the technical performance is very similar, but the PRX have better note weight and a more controlled upper-midrange with more natural vocals. The Luna are a touch faster and cleaner in the low-end and also have more lively and energetic vocals, but the PRX sound richer and warmer, leading to a slightly less neutral yet more natural sound reproduction. Both are pretty hard to drive. In terms of comfort, the PRX are better thanks to the smaller shells, whereas the Luna are bulkier even though their isolation from external noises is superior. The SGOR Luna win when it comes to the stock cable. The packaging of the SGOR Luna is slightly better but at the end of the day there’s not much difference: although the Luna come with more comfortable stock tips, the PRX come with an added pair of foam tips, which are not included with the Luna.I’d pick the PRX based on my own preferences, since I prefer better note weight and a richer low-end along with better comfort, but I also see the reasons why some would prefer the more energetic vocals on the Luna and their more neutral response. **KZ PRX vs NiceHCK F1 Pro** >This is fairly interesting honestly because the PRX are so close to the F1 Pro in terms of performance that I was surprised to compare these. Let’s say that the F1 Pro are a touch drier and faster but the PRX sound more refined and natural, with better note weight, better end-to-end extension and a less fatiguing, non-sibilant upper-midrange. The soundstage is more spacious on the PRX, imaging is mostly on par but the better soundstage of the PRX makes up for better layering and positioning of the various sounds and instruments. The F1 Pro are a bit easier to drive in general.Comfort is good on both sets, isolation is average on both sets but the F1 Pro isolate slightly better from external noises. Packaging, cable and accessories are an easy win for the NiceHCK F1 Pro. # Final Thoughts The PRX are a true surprise, especially considering the previous planar sets from KZ.The end to end extension is very good for the price, the note weight is on-point for a cheap planar, and the overall technical performance and resolution are above average. KZ has really managed to find a sweet spot between technical prowess and tuning that people wanted for a long time in the sub-50$ price range and I really struggled to find major issues with the PRX.  If anything, there’s still a bit of added brightness that treble sensitive folks won’t like, and a proper source is needed (and well, KZ seriously needs to upgrade the stock cable), but other than this there isn’t much to say if not “great job KZ, this is a strike!”.

I am usually not a fan of planars when it comes to daily driving an IEM (I like dynamic drivers more than planars because of their more natural timbre), but this is really good coming from KZ. From the PR2 to this the improvement is evident.

Those are a bunch of not well know, or just not especially good iems, aside from the Kz PRX, however you would like to get some kind of dongle DAC with that one tho. Are these your only options avalible?

i suggest Kefine Klean honestly, the safest option around $50 and you arent really going to get much better performance around $50, the only option might be the KZ PRX BUT it needs good amplification.

!thanks a lot for the nice reply. I was simply concerned because I also have the KZ PRX (my first planer) which is really power hungry and sounds bassy and distant with the JM6. I recently bought the Fiio Ka11 (still within return window), which makes the PRX sound amazing, hence I was motivated to order the Aether seeing a sale. So, I was just wondering whether to just keep the Fiio K11 or return it to order the cheaper Allegro with both 4.4 and 3.5mm

I agree! I totally forgot to recommend it ‘cause I’m too absorbed in my Aether nowadays lol. I returned my Artti T10 because I hated the harsh treble. PRX has smoother treble while still maintaining excellent details and wide soundstage. It is a very underrated planer set and a steal -at around $30. I got mine during the spring sale for $21!!

It’s the most refined kz planar, and it’s pretty good. It’s a better pr2 v1.

Simgot EW300 and Kefine Klean are current stand out. if you want planar for that extra details, there are ARTTI T10, SGOR Luna, and KZ PRX are all under $70.

yup, if you want to try planar, get a decent cheapo dac-amp. or get plana iem that is in under $50 range, i suppose getting either SGOR Luna or KZ PRX with Fiio KA11 dac/amp will still at around $70-ish in total,

I 100 % agree with your assessment. I read so many articles and posts praising the Reds so they were my first purchase and... I just don't hear it. Disappointed 100%. Tip rolling did improve the sound but it was still unsatisfying. It was just so... bland. I then bought Celest Wyvern Black for $25 and wow, what a difference. So clear, punchy bass, and in overall, a great sounding IEM. This led me to purchase the following: Celest Relentless, KZ PRX, KZ Zenith, and Kiwi Ears Aether. All sound amazing. While some on the list are more expensive than then the Reds, PRX (planar) and the aforementioned Wyvern are cheaper and both are leaps and bounds better than the Reds

The KZ PRX are lovely with some power and eq

Hey u/ScrutoAudio! I just wanted to say your recommendation was spot on. I quickly fell in love with the Supermix after using my friend's unit a few times. I ended up buying one during the 12.12 sale! I also got the KZ PRX, which is awesome for genres where the Supermix doesn't quite shine. Thanks again for the great suggestion!

1. Timeless was a fast trick pony, but the budget planar game has changed dramatically since that set. KZ PRX is tighter and cleaner for significantly less. 2. Diminishing returns hit HARD in this market. What you *don’t* always get: significant leaps in clarity or detail, guaranteed better fit or build, or a sound you like more

I'm talking about the latest KZ planar, the PRX. I love mine and for solid reasons- KZ has a rocky timeline with their attempt at a planar series and the PRX is the result of those efforts. Totally worth it. I just bought the Simgot EA500LM and let me tell you- best resolution for the price. If you had to spend $200-$350 for an upgrade, you'd only get minor gains and diminishing returns. It hits the VALUE mark HARD. For some, it can be bright, but thats why it comes with 3 tuning nozzles that have their own unique tuning characteristics. So while it's a set that punches a couple hundred dollars above its price, it's because of the tuning flexibility and absolute technicalities. Most people spend **$1,000+** chasing the kind of engagement, dynamics and emotional connection I found in the EA500LM. That’s how good this thing is.

KZ PRX can be had for 35-40$ and after some EQ ( not a v shape fan ) presents a “better” deal, but one has to factor in a new cable so maybe not hmm

Well I got many other sets one being 700$ just to paint a spectrum of my experience ..And I would not call PRX shit… I know KZ has poor history, and it is my only KZ iem but I got it out of curiosity and once eq’d I cannot complain. It is a solid iem and well worth the pocket money it costs.

Yeah the PRX is good only after EQ, accessories are typical KZ sh*t hah. But it being a planar it EQ’s very well and I can mold it with parametric EQ to sound like a way more expensive iem. But one has to have knowledge in this regard.

I heard that they are very spicy on the highs but never heard of the bass. Warm planarwise I have Artti T10 is pretty good KZ PRX is also very good but they are not as technical. Also some people really like S08

I prefer headphones but got some 50$ KZ PRX's to swap with my LCD-2s when the weight gets to me. They don't sound better but damn they sound good it's insane how nice the sound quality is for the price. If I were to ball out again I would get headphones over IEMs but speakers will probably be next on my list. I prefer the wider soundstage of open back headphones. The biggest reason too is because they are bad for the ears and get painful really quickly for me. I have to leave them at a pretty low volume compared to my LCD's due to it causing pain much easier. I already have somewhat bad tinnitus.

I've only tried the PRX's but the sound quality is absolutely nuts for the price. Pretty good value to me imo.

Audeze LCD-2's have been what I've been using for a long time. Tried my friends either moondrop stellaris or truthear hexa's when I visited him and was hella surprised. Barely even sounded like much of a step down and were quickly enjoyable. Ended up snagging the PRX's recently just to have something to swap between.

I just got my KZ PRX's in the mail today and have em hooked up to my NFB-15, used an EQ to tweak the sound a little bit. I'm blown away by the sound quality for these little 50$ pair of IEMs, really sick that quality like this is available for the pricepoint. I use LCD-2's and these barely sound like much of a step down from them. Perfect choice for when I'm on the go or if my LCD-2's are feeling too heavy, also having a second pair to listen to makes you appreciate the sounds they produce more.