Simgot - ET142

The ET142 are my current favorite planar IEMs. They are just so good at so many things and the 3-in-1 tuning is extremely versatile. I think the lack of popularity is due to the kinda botched release. For those who don’t know, Simgot sent out early pre-production samples to reviewers (myself included) to get their opinion on the tuning before release. I, and several others told Simgot that the 2 nozzles were too similar, and that if they wanted to repeat the success they had with the EW300, they should modify one of the nozzles to be a warmer, darker tuning, and keep the brighter tuning. Making it a 2-in-1. Simgot said they were making changes, and then radio silence. I wasn’t given the green light to post my review, and I didn’t know pricing, so I didn’t post my review. Other reviewers, did post reviews, and they were… mixed. Most took issue with the nozzles being too similar and criticized the tuning for being too bright. Essentially, it was an “also ran” in the planar IEM market. Fast forward a month or so. Simgot sends out new nozzles, gives everybody the green light to release their reviews, and launches the set. Now. Most people would Google “Simgot ET142 Review” and find the older reviews from before the tuning changes were made. However, the new nozzles add a lot to the value proposition of the ET142, and the new tunings are different from the stock tuning with the burnished nozzles. Making it now a 3-in-1. New reviews come out. Praise floods in. But it’s hard to undo the traction that those early reviews had. I for one, love all the nozzles on the ET-142. It’s a fantastic set. I call it the “ET142 Chameleon” because of it’s versatility. I highly recommend it to anybody looking to get a planar IEM in the $200 range. And I agree with you. I’d take this over Estrella easily.

Check out my full review and feature of the Simgot ET142 here: https://mobileaudiophile.com/in-ear-earphones-iem-iems-reviews/simgot-et142-review/ Simgot ET142 Review -Planar Magnetic & Piezoelectric hybrid -Four Tuning nozzles/foam inserts Hello everyone, at the link above (and below) is my full review and feature of the Simgot ET142 from Simgot Audio. I have spent a very long time with this set and have really been able to deep dive into its stellar build, design, packaging, and highly capable tuning. The ET142 is actually Simgot's second foray into planar technology, but their first in-ear monitor using the tech. However, the ET142 is actually a hybrid iem which pairs the planar with a piezoelectric driver to cover the highs. We've seen this pairing in the past. Namely, the Raptgo Hook-X as well as HBB's version of the Hook-X. Folks, I find the ET142 to be a true competitor, a legit technical beast, detail monster and altogether a very talented set. One thing I truly enjoy is that Simgot provided so many ways to dial in the sound to perfectly fit your personal preferences. With the use of tuning nozzle and tuning foam I am able to perfect my version of this set. The nice thing is that the ET142 has such an awesome foundation to work with. At any rate, I cover every aspect of this set and so if it seems you'd enjoy learning more then please feel free to check out my thoughts. With that said, just take care and have a wonderful day! Comparisons: Letshuoer S12 2024 Edition 🔥👑 ET142 Pros 👑🔥 -Build is more like a tank than anything else I can think of -Typical classy and amazing Simgot design. Gorgeous -Great unboxing experience -Fantastic Simgot LC7 modular cable, nice case, boatload of tips -Some of the best tuning nozzles (four in total) -Very technically proficient tuning with a very clean sound -Snappy, deep, impactful, and very tight bass region -Midrange is crisp, high resolution, fast transients -Treble has nice brilliance, pristine, highly detailed, nice extension -Detail Retrieval -Spatial imaging -Large soundstage ET142 Cons -Some nozzles can be too bright for some -Not the most lush, rich, and organic sounding -Some slight planar timbre (doesn’t bother me at all) #planar #planar magnetic #Simgot #SimgotET142 #TechnicalBeast #DetailMonster Check out my full review and feature of the Simgot ET142 here: https://mobileaudiophile.com/in-ear-earphones-iem-iems-reviews/simgot-et142-review/

That's a tough question to answer, although I get why you are asking it. It'd be something I'd ask too. It really all comes down to you and what you desire for your collection. Simgot has so many flat-out awesome iems like the EA500, EA500LM, EW300, Supermix4, among others. I think they are worth buying if you'd like to test out other driver types and materials. Each one listed is a very solid iem. Of course, the sound signature has to suit you too. In fact, that's the most important thing. Find what you enjoy. Having said all of that, the ET142 is flat out great and you can tune it to your preferences. For the most part. Really a special set. For me, in a couple of the nozzles is a hair too bright for me but once I start playing around with Simgot's included nozzles and foam inserts it became plainly obvious that this is a special iem. I realize I didn't really give you a good answer but again, hard question to answer for someone else. Whatever you decide you'll at least come away with a great set.

Simgot ET142*($160)* and FiiO KA15*($85)*

I'm in love with my Simgot ET142, very clear vocals and instruments. But its weakness is the bass, its still enjoyable but in some songs with heavy bass drops, it can feel lacking/low volume. The bass is high quality, but you just gotta ramp up the volume a bit to hear the rumble. I've been using it for a week, does not get fatiguing on a 3hour road trip.

The et142 came out a few months ago, but was only really available on Aliexpress. The recently rereleased it with more tuning nozzles and it graphs well. reviews have been pretty positive. On the other hand, It’s $199, and there doesn’t seem to be much reason to get it over the s12 pro beyond more flexibility with tuning nozzles/foam

How *I* Rank My IEMs (and Headphones): Best-in-Class by Price and Use Case ## My **Personal** IEM Tier List (with reasoning, specs & use cases) Figured I’d share how I’ve ranked the IEMs (and a few headphones) in my collection. These are **not** ranked by raw technical performance. Instead, I ranked them by **best-in-class for their price and use case** — what I reach for in real-world listening; these are just *my* opinions. > **Note**: Specs have been corrected after third-party review. A few values are estimates where official data was missing (especially for DSP-based IEMs). Feedback welcome. --- ### **Rank 1a – Hifiman HE1000 Stealth** - **Price**: $1,399 - **Drivers**: Planar Magnetic - **Impedance**: 32Ω *(unverified)* - **Sensitivity**: 93 dB/mW *(unverified)*, 108 dB/Vrms *(estimated)* - **Freq Response**: 8Hz–65kHz *(unverified)* - **Why**: My overall best headphone. Expansive stage, technical mastery, and refinement. - [Link](https://store.hifiman.com/index.php/he1000-stealth-magnet-version.html) --- ### **Rank 1b – Thieaudio Valhalla (CIEM)** - **Price**: $2,200 - **Drivers**: 19BA - **Impedance**: 9Ω *(unverified)* - **Sensitivity**: 103 dB/mW *(unverified)*, ~112.5 dB/Vrms *(estimated)* - **Freq Response**: 10Hz–44kHz - **Why**: Overall best IEM. Forensic detail, expansive stage, CIEM fit. Endgame for analytic listening. - [Link](https://www.thieaudio.com/products/thieaudio-valhalla) --- ### **Rank 2 – Thieaudio Prestige LTD** - **Price**: $1,299 - **Drivers**: 1DD + 4BA + 4EST - **Impedance**: 22Ω - **Sensitivity**: 99 dB/mW, **115.6 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* - **Freq Response**: 20Hz–20kHz *(unverified)* - **Why**: Refined tribrid with excellent resolution and smooth tuning. - [Link](https://www.thieaudio.com/products/thieaudio-prestige-ltd) --- ### **Rank 3 – Hisenior Mega5EST** - **Price**: $549 - **Drivers**: 1DD + 2BA + 2EST - **Impedance**: 25Ω - **Sensitivity**: **100 dB/mW** *(corrected)*, **116.0 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* - **Freq Response**: 10Hz–50kHz - **Why**: Smooth and airy with that EST treble sheen. - [Link](https://www.hisenior-iem.com/products/mega5est-hybrid-iem) --- ### **Rank 4 – Dunu DK3001BD** - **Price**: $499 - **Drivers**: 1DD + 4BA + 4 Planar - **Impedance**: 26Ω - **Sensitivity**: 108 dB/mW, **122.0 dB/Vrms** *(official)* - **Freq Response**: 5Hz–40kHz - **Why**: Crisp and detailed. Unique tribrid stack with strong technicals. - [Link](https://www.dunu-topsound.com/product-page/dk3001bd) --- ### **Rank 5a – Aune SR7000 (Closed-Back Headphone)** - **Price**: $599 - **Drivers**: Dynamic (MLD) - **Impedance**: 55Ω - **Sensitivity**: 106 dB/mW *(unverified)*, ~123.4 dB/Vrms *(estimated)* - **Freq Response**: 5Hz–44.5kHz - **Why**: Best closed-back I own. Balanced and natural. - [Link](https://www.aune-store.com/en/aune-sr-7000-high-res-headphone_110211_1252/) --- ### **Rank 5b – Hifiman Edition XS (Open-Back Headphone)** - **Price**: $380 - **Drivers**: Planar Magnetic - **Impedance**: 18Ω *(unverified)* - **Sensitivity**: 92 dB/mW *(unverified)*, 104.6 dB/Vrms *(estimated)* - **Freq Response**: 8Hz–50kHz *(unverified)* - **Why**: Massive soundstage, excellent value in open-backs. - [Link](https://store.hifiman.com/index.php/edition-xs.html) --- ### **Rank 5c – Xenns Tea Pro** - **Price**: $339 - **Drivers**: **2DD + 6BA** *(corrected)* - **Impedance**: 13Ω - **Sensitivity**: 104 dB/mW, **122.9 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* - **Freq Response**: 20Hz–22kHz - **Why**: Smooth and musical. Despite spec confusion, still enjoyable. - [Link](https://shenzhenaudio.com/products/xenns-mangird-tea-pro) --- ### **Rank 6 – Simgot ET142** - **Price**: $220 - **Drivers**: 12.5mm Planar + PZT - **Impedance**: 14Ω - **Sensitivity**: 106.5 dB/mW *(derived)*, **118 dB/Vrms** *(official)* - **Freq Response**: 8Hz–40kHz - **Why**: Unique design with tuning nozzle system and solid tech. - [Link](https://www.linsoul.com/products/simgot-et142) --- ### **Rank 7–17 – Budget & Specialty Picks** **Niche roles, convenience use, or just plain fun:** - **Letshuoer S12 Pro** ($169) 14.8mm Planar — 16Ω *(assumed)*, 102 dB/mW *(assumed)*, **120.0 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* [Link](https://letshuoer.net/products/letshuoer-s12-pro-magnetic-planar-earphones-hi-fi-planar-in-ear-monitors-for-audiopiles-and-music-lovers) - **FiiO FT1** ($149) 60mm Dynamic — 32Ω, 105 dB/mW, **120.0 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* [Link](https://headphones.com/products/fiio-ft1-headphones) - **AFUL Explorer** ($120) 1DD + 2BA — 26Ω, 108 dB/mW, **123.9 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://afulaudio.com/products/aful-explorer) - **Letshuoer S08** ($119) Planar Magnetic — 26Ω, 105 dB/mW, **120.9 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://letshuoer.net/products/letshuoer-s08-fourth-generation-in-ear-monitor-earphone-for-audiophiles-musicians-studio) - **Artti T10** ($79) Planar Magnetic — 16.5Ω, 84.8 dB/mW, **102.6 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://artti.cn/products/artti-t10-huge-planar-headphones-wired-in-ear-monitors-hifi-earphones) - **Kiwi Ears Cadenza** ($35) 10mm Beryllium DD — 32Ω, 110 dB/mW, **125.0 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://kiwiears.com/products/kiwi-ears-cadenza) - **Moondrop Chu II DSP** ($25) DSP-only — 18Ω, 106.4 dB/mW *(assumed)*, **123.9 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* [Link](https://moondroplab.com/en/products/chu-ii) - **Truthear Gate** ($19) 10mm DD — 28Ω, 108 dB/mW, **123.5 dB/Vrms** *(user value was incorrect at 93.5)* [Link](https://shenzhenaudio.com/products/truthear-gate-dynamic-driver-hifi-in-ear-monitors) - **ND Planet** ($18) 12mm LCP DD — 32Ω, 97.9 dB/mW, **112.9 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://www.linsoul.com/products/nd-planet) - **Qudelix T71 IEM** ($229) 1DD + 3BA, DSP — ~12Ω *(assumed)*, ~105 dB/mW *(assumed)*, **124.2 dB/Vrms** *(recalculated)* [Link](https://www.qudelix.com/products/t71-iem) - **Koss Porta Pro** ($40) On-ear Dynamic — 60Ω, 101 dB/mW, **113.2 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://koss.com/products/porta-pro) - **Qudelix BalPods Open** ($29) 14.3mm Earbuds — 150Ω, 103 dB/mW, **111.2 dB/Vrms** [Link](https://www.qudelix.com/products/balpods-open-type) --- ## Final Notes - This list is **contextual**, not absolute. Rankings reflect real-world use, not just raw specs. - I’ve corrected spec errors and recalculated all dB/Vrms values using verified formulas and sources where possible. - Some models (especially DSP-based or low-profile budget sets) still rely on estimated or assumed specs. Corrections, additions, and debate welcome. Thanks to those who caught errors — this hobby’s better when we all help keep things accurate.

I use Ti nozzle with foam inside and tangzu balance eartip + 4.4mm connector and Dew4x DAC . I mosly use it when i need more bass compare to my other planar

Great now I want the ea1000 lol, but I ended up with the et142 instead. Great versatile set btw, haven’t even heard planar timbre but I’m sure it’s hiding somewhere.

I’d say the et142 is a fantastic choice, same with timeless 2, but since you like the lm the et142 would be closer. Both have 4 different nozzles to tame or boost the upper mids/lower treble. Timeless 2 also has those bullet nozzles that create a spacious sound…a little different but spacious. Ea1000 is pretty much the lm with red nozzles (or the og ea500) but slightly better. I prefer the dunu falcon ultra and tanchjim origin for single dd in that range (also fiio fd15, which is $150). Rather than those 2 planars I’d get the s12 2024, imo it’s still the best planar aside from s15

Decided I needed to try some new IEMs after having used some Shure SE846s for the last decade. Especially after having updated my studio monitors to ATC SCM20ASL this past year (absolute end game speakers for me), my IEMs just weren’t quite satisfying me anymore. Prioritizing soundstage and dynamics, I researched a lot but decided to buy and compare the following: 1. simgot et142 (about $300 CAD) 2. ziigaat estrella (about $400 CAD) 3. mangird tea pros (about $500 CAD) I went into this thinking I was going to like the estrellas the most just based on what I read. But out of curiosity I ordered the et142s because I read that the simgot ea1000s were the soundstage champs for the price range, but they weren’t available and the et142s seem to kind of be the successor. I also ordered the Tea Pros because they are so universally lauded but haven’t received them yet. I’m glad I took the gamble on the simgot et142s though. After a couple of days A/Bing between them and the estrellas… I think they have the estrellas beat. They have better soundstage, better dynamics, and they are somehow both more revealing in the top end but also warmer and with more heft in the low mids. With that being said they are more similar than not (surprising to me), but every time I go from the et142 to the estrella, the main impression I consistently get is that the estrella sounds very close, but it’s just “thinner”. I should mention that I’m gain-matching them to rule out volume change bias, so the thinness isn’t just lower volume. I’ve seen a lot of discussion on the estrellas but very little on the et142s. I unfortunately haven’t heard the very popular ea1000s so I can’t say if they truly are the successors to that line, but regardless I am kind of blown away. I had zero expectations of them winning my A/B test, and I still want to do further comparisons on more tracks, but so far they are the underdog winners here. Looking forward to comparing them to the Tea Pros when those arrive. For reference I am testing the et142s with the burnished purple/blue filters that were installed on them in the box (haven’t even tried the other filters yet yet) and the black ear tips they came with, plus stock cable. I put an upgraded cable on the estrellas and switched to some dunu tips that sounded best with them. Testing both with the qudelix 5k. Both with and without some custom eqs I’ve made to match them both to my preferred sound signature. The et142s are winning for me both in the EQd and raw non-EQd comparisons. Anybody else have similar experiences with the simgot et142s? Seeing very little discussion on them. Are these largely being slept on due to lack of discussion? They have really defied my expectations so far!

Get the Simgot ET142. I have stopped buying IEMs after getting these

Cel mai bine le-am potrivit cu Huawei P9!?! Mai degrabă mai pui 90€ si te procopsești cu 4 căști în una și îți iei Simgot ET142 🤪

500LM until this day, still slams the hardest when it comes to bass. Like, brain rattling type of bass punch. I feel that it has something to do with how fast the bass is, the uppermids and the metal shell. Other IEMs I've tried and slams just as hard will be the ET-142 and the ibasso jr. klee. Either beryllium coated DD or LiMg DD.