ET142

simgot et142 is certainly up there, known to be a beast for resolution + techs a brighter signature (like et142) tends to have the effect of pushing up the perceived detail and resolution. whether or not you can handle or prefer that brightness though is a different story but it does have a more engaging sound while still being able to keep vocals present for resolution though you won't be disappointed with any of the planers you listed, those are all excellent choices. t10's are pretty much clones of s12 in a plastic shell so if you want something like what you had then those are there

Kiwi Ears Canta (around 100usd) Punch Audio Martilo (300ish usd) AFUL P5+2...have a mini planar in there...(a little over 200usd) Simgot ET142 .... planar with pzt driver (around 200) I have all those...and I love em. That's my regular rotation

I like BOTH the Divine and Diablo tuning. They are DIFFERENT. Those cables are certainly not my cup of tea. They were immediately replaced as soon as I unboxed the sets. I also have the ET142...the versatility (nozzle tuning) of that set puts it in a different spot compared to ALL the others. I have others "older" planar and planar hybrids. The only one that doesn't hold up (to me) is the F1Pro.... especially when compared to the Divine. The issues (for me) of the F1 Pro can be managed with EQ and tip rolling.

I think some folks (me included) get surprised with the quality and amount of bass a planar IEM can bring. Typically people hear planar and they associate the shimmery almost metallic treble. Add-in the fact that most planars are often associated with open back cans...which steers people toward open and bright (thank you HiFiMAN) Truth is planar drivers are EXTREMELY versatile. They take EQ like a champ! I have one planar only set and several planar hybrids. The F1 Pro (NiceNCK) can give me the rumble if I put on a nice bass shelf. The ET142 (Simgot) is a hybrid planar that can get plenty warm with a nozzle change AND a attenuation foam insert. Not quite Explorer level warmth...but warm nonetheless. Am excited to get my hands on the pair of 7Hz x Crinacle collabs that just came out. They both seem right in my sweet spot for the music I listen to

God no. If you want simgot you need to spend more to get to the level of Aether. Et142 will be on par but they cost more

It's a game changing planar. It's a real shame that so many reviews of the non-final version went up. I think it took a lot of wind out of the sails. Technically it might not be a massive step up from the other $100-$200 planars. But the *Versatility* that it offers is something no other planar can really offer. It competes with the kilobuck planars at a fraction of the price, and the only real downsides as you mentioned are the weight of the IEMs and the cable, and the fact that most people don't wanna swap nozzles. Happy you're loving it. I love mine.

I recently tried the S12 Pro, S12 Anniversary, Timeless II, Timeless AE, Simgot ET142, Artti T10, Hidisz MP145, and Zetian Wu Legend. It's tough to pick a personal favorite since they all have their pros and cons, but if I had to choose, my top picks would probably be: * Timeless II or Timeless AE (whichever is cheaper). I like the Timeless II, but it can be prone to sibilance. The Timeless AE isn't as sibilant, but its upper treble is definitely a bit too much for me. * Simgot ET142. These are actually really good. The bass reminds me of the Timeless II/AE and the treble isn't as harsh as, say the S12 Pro. My only issue is the apparent peak in the upper-mids. * S12 Pro. Mostly because they're one of the cheapest options and the fit is easy as hell. They don't lack in technicalities compared to the rest either but yeah, the treble can be a bit too much for me. * Lastly, the MP145. The fit can be tricky, but when I get a good seal, they're good. Plus in my country they can be cheaper than the S12 Pro. As for the Artti T10, I had a hard time getting a good fit so I'll probably pass on that one. Still haven't tried the Zetian Wu Heyday or the Kiwi Ears Aether tho.

Sorry for the late reply bro, things were kinda hectic irl. >how is ET142 compared to others? Compared to other Simgots? Or other planars? I think they’re pretty comparable to something like the Timeless II and they’re super easy to fit in my ears. I was actually surprised I could enjoy the ET142 even though they have a lot of energy in the treble. They’re a lil bit harsher than the other Simgots (kinda comparable to the EA1000 in terms of harshness) but you can sort of tune it because of the nozzle options (they give you 4 nozzles). For the price they’re pretty detailed. Compared to the SM4, I feel like I get “better” bass in ET142 since they are kinda a planar set. I get faster transients and all that so the ET142s are nicer for metal song. The downside is ET142s have more energy in the upper mid and treble compared to SM4. Vocals can sound more shouty in ET142 and ET142s are more prone to sibilant due to that extra energy in the treble.

Planars for me are like cheaper equivalent of good multi-driver IEMs. What I like though about most cheap but good planars S12 series. Timeless series Hidizs MP145, 143 Simgot ET142 etc IEMs is that they sound 'transparent' like even when there is a lot of sounds playing at once I can still clearly hear everything like for example I was listening to a podcast while this orchestral rock music with so many instruments playing yet I can still clearly understand what is being talked about on the podcast.

Shoutout to Aful P7 and Davinci as well and among the most impressive Planar for me has been the Simgot ET142