ZiiGaat Luna

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

Overall

#59 in

IEMs

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score80% positive
8
0
2

Top Pros

Top Cons

Last updated: Oct 15, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit IconAccomplished-Ruin945
5 months ago

I'm just getting into the hobby and of the iem's I have now, Ziigaat Luna seems to fit me the best.

Reddit Iconcouldliveinhope
10 months ago

For my desktop setup I recently purchased a FiiO K13 R2R DAC/amp and absolutely love it. It's a nice upgrade from my old FiiO K3 and it's spendy, but according to many reviewers/experts it's a great value and sounds as good as some more expensive equipment. I use AKG K702 headphones (open back) and just recently got my first IEMs, the Ziigaat Luna, which are astoundingly good reference IEMs despite not having the kind of soundstage I'm used to with my headphones. The clarity on the mids and highs in particular is great, and I can tell these have 6 drivers each. It's nice to rotate between these during long sessions as headphone fatigue is a real problem for me as I wear glasses. At home I have maxed out sound quality settings on Tidal. I got a cheap USB-C DAC/amp for mobile listening. Honestly, even the Apple one would be serviceable for most IEMs as they are low impedance. I'm going to try bringing the IEMs on the go now but have been using AirPods Pro for a few years so it's going to be tough going back to wired earbuds despite the higher audio quality. To keep the hi-res setup on the go I usually pre-download a bunch of stuff I want to listen to on my phone while on Wi-Fi as my 5G can randomly drop out on the bus or at work. I wouldn't rush into any purchases—do your research, buy something that fits your wishes, and you will be rewarded. That being said, from my experience almost every audio upgrade in my life has been worth it haha. Side note: If you're on a Mac, Tidal is great due to its exclusive mode setting, which allows Tidal to control your audio settings and automatically achieve bit-perfect playback for whatever sample rate your tracks are. This was the reason I switched from Apple Music last month.

Reddit IconDarwinConquer0r
11 months ago

Your going to want a Ziigaat most likely just due to the very wide spectrum of genres you've presented, Crescent(my favorite Ziigaat) Kiwi Ears Astral, Ziigaat Luna, Soft Ears Volume S. Other then that, I ran out of my own personal experience to dive any deeper, I suspect that with the Luna or Crescent you'll be super happy IME.

Reddit IconLegarIsHere69
7 months ago

The ziigat Luna! And the simgot sm5 I guess I've tried the Luna before and kinda fell in love with it And for the sm5, it's just cool to see manufacturer cramps as much driver as they can

Reddit IconMneasi
7 months ago

Ziigaat Luna all the way in (preferred over Odyssey 2)

Reddit Iconnotremsss
11 months ago

Over the past few days, I did some auditioning of several earphones. As a reference, Mahler's Symphony No. 2 : to check the state where many instruments are sounding simultaneously from the lowest to the highest notes. (It is a scene where a choir of about 150 people and an orchestra of about 120 people, plus an organ playing the lowest notes and exploding metallic percussion, are sounding at ffff.) Robert Glasper : to check modern resolution and bass recording. Cornelius : to check sound images that are filled with fine, sparkly sounds like pointillism. (Where minute sounds are scattered in the space, flying around left, right, front, and back with panning and effects.) James Blake : for checking vocals and sub-bass. My orchestral studio recordings. This experience is completely my subjectivity and is a result suited to my ears and needs, so there are no specific claims. It would be helpful if you could keep that in mind. The earphones I tried were: Ultimate Ears / UE Reference Remastered Plus Pro, UE LIVE, UE Premiere 64 Audio / U18s, U18t, U12t ZiiGaat / Luna Etymotic / ER4SR And so on. Writing my impressions one by one would become too long, so I will omit that, but simply summarized, it was like this: UE Reference Remastered Plus Pro The volume difference between instruments, positioning of each instrument, localization, and layering are understood quite well. Especially with my self-made recordings, the materials of the recording itself and the not-good parts of the mix are easy to understand. However, a very big problem—which I suppose is a problem of having 3 drivers—is that there is no separation of instruments. The sound comes heard gathered together in highs, mids, and lows, and in parts where many instruments ring, it was saturated. I thought it might be quite good for mixing with a small number of instruments. UE LIVE, UE Premiere Information of many sounds comes in indiscriminately. The tuning is not neutral at all. A sensation that the sound is raging. And a "clumped" sensation (dumpling-like feeling). My own recordings somehow sound good. It was not for mixing purposes. 64 Audio / U18s, U18t, U12t U18t The resolution was amazing. It is transparency. And the airiness. It is an image where things like particles are visible. However, the sound changes quite a bit depending on the impedance and the environment of the playback device. And the bass is quite quiet, so I predicted that if I perform mixing with this, there is a possibility that the mix will become boomy. I thought that if it is a fixed, high-quality, stable playback environment where the characteristics are firmly understood, this would be the best. U18s Overall, the mids are lifted a little, and it was a sensation that the highs are rolled off. As a result, the resolution and transparency that were in the 18t were lost, and instead, it was a feeling of putting out a musical ringing and stable mids and lows. Also, the connection between sounds is mellow and—shall I say—silky... Because of that, it is very easy to listen to, but I felt that the separation of sound is lost. I felt it would be easy to use as a stage monitor. But not for mixing. U12t This one fit me the best. Not to the extent of the 18t, but I felt the balance of resolution, transparency, separation, localization, grasp of depth, etc., was very good. Also, even when I performed playback tests from several devices, there was no change in the sound the most. (I use earphones and headphones in diverse environments, from smartphones to laptops, studio earphone amps to DACs, and various types of audio interfaces.) Etymotic / ER4SR It was the flattest among what I heard. Flat to anywhere. However, the sound field was quite narrow, and the placement of the orchestra was hard to see. ZiiGaat / Luna It was quite good. It was a sensation like a lower-compatible version (lite version) of the U12t. A common point regarding the problems of the ER4SR and UE Reference Remastered Plus Pro was that I somehow understood that ones with few drivers do not match my use. Of course, there are probably many good things even for single drivers, but this is regarding my hearing. Also, the IE900 did not have the flatness I imagined; the bass and treble were lifted, and I felt it is for listening, not a monitor. Sony / IER-M9 Alclair / Electro Six Driver FiR Audio / Xenon 6 I wanted to try these, but I did not have the opportunity.

Top IEMs on Reddit

1
7Hz 7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2

7Hz

7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2

76% positive of 493 users

Budget gaming pick, but poor cables and polarizing bass.

2
AFUL Explorer

AFUL

Explorer

76% positive of 251 users

All-day comfort, warm sound, but lacks clarity and detail.

3
KEFINE Klean

KEFINE

Klean

81% positive of 228 users

Budget gaming, but harsh treble and moisture issues.

4
TANCHJIM Bunny

TANCHJIM

Bunny

80% positive of 202 users

Unique app EQ customization, but odd connector port design.

5
ARTTI T10

ARTTI

T10

80% positive of 202 users

Detailed sound, great value, but fit issues for some.

Rankings by Use Case

Other Reddit Recommendations:

FAQs