Canon - SELPHY SQUARE QX10

Agreed! I bought this on vacation because I was scrapbooking a lot and the small size is one of the benefits. The app gives me a ton of control over what I print and has made memory keeping even more joyful!

Also love my Canon Selphy!! The photo quality matters to me since I love looking back and rediscovering memories!

You're asking about price per print, *including* the amortized cost of the printer. In the long run, ink and paper costs always dominate. Short term however, the price of the printer dominates. A more expensive printer, such as the Epson ET8550, will have very good long term cost, but the initial investment is steep. A less expensive printer, such as a Canon SELPHY, will have a modest initial price, but price per picture adds up much faster. The least expensive printer is Walgreen's, with no up-front cost, but high ongoing cost. A second consideration is quality. The more expensive the printer, the higher the print quality. The ET8550 will outperform Walgreens, producing richer colors and more detail. A professional printer such as the Canon Pro 1200, will be even better. The SELPHY does not match Walgreens. And then there's effort. Walgreens takes your JPEGs and prints them. SELPHY does, too. But a dedicated printer will require some fiddling with a computer to get good results. On the flip side, you get to play with various paper types and sizes. But make no mistake, this is extra effort. Personally, I went with a Canon Pro 200, which is roughly equivalent to the Epson ET8550, but cheaper to buy and more expensive to operate. It's all a matter of how much do you intend to print. I also have a much cheaper Epson XP8500, which prints better photos than the SELPHY, for less money, but can't match the Pro 200. I also have a SELPHY, which is nice for what it is, but can't match Walgreen. And I have an INSTAX printer, which fits in my pocket and prints adorable little polaroids. But quality can't match even the SELPHY. Depending on your needs, all of the mentioned printers are a good purchase. In your case, I'd probably recommend the Epson XP8800 as a cheap, good quality photo printer. You'll be able to buy six full ink replacements before you'll reach the cost of the ET8550, which should take several years. If you'd like to splurge, the ET8550 is definitely the better printer, with lower ink costs. And keep in mind that ink is only one part of the running costs. It's easy to get swept up in the marketing that an ecotank printer makes printing "free". But that's ignoring paper costs, which in my experience dominate printing costs in the long run. First party paper is reliable and good, but offers only limited variations. Third party paper requires matching printer profiles, which can be hard to come by for non-professional printers such as the XP8800 (but some paper manufacturers (Photospeed) profile for free, and there are cheap services for creating bespoke profiles).

Essentially, there are 4x6 dye-sub printers like the SELPHY CP1500, the mini dye-subs like the QX10, Zink printers, and INSTAX printers. Stay away from the mini dye-subs. My QX10 broke twice in two weeks, and and each time wasted an entire ink cartridge. They are trash. The other options work well. The big SELPHY is decent quality and large, but slow and loud and not really all that portable. Zink is faster and portable and prints on paper. INSTAX is much faster, least good quality, but with analog charm.

I’ve had a Canon Ivy for years, and also a Canon Selphy square. I tend to use the Selphy a lot because it is newer and higher quality, but the narrower Ivy photos work well if I have a little less space. I got non-proprietary cases for travel and have loved having them!

I have not had any issues at all. Since I’m a data kind of person, I looked up my receipts and here are my stats, lol: It is the QX10, and I’ve had it since Dec 2023. I’ve purchased 120 sheets of photo paper for it and have ~20 sheets right now, so it has printed 100 photos for me so far. 😊

I second the Canon qx20 (or qx10 if you just want a 2x3" print). I don't like the HP sprocket 200 or Canon ivy 2... they seem to overly sharpen and I don't like how they reproduce darker skin tones.

I have a canon selphy, I think the qx-10 (the new one is qx-20, has usb c and some new features). I like it a lot! I would say that the quality of the photos isn't quite to what you'd get when you order photos, but it's still pretty good. The pictures are maybe slightly fuzzy, and I think blacks aren't as rich, but otherwise pretty good. If you don't peel the backing off, they're as thick and stiff as a normal photo, but they're pretty thin when you stick them in your planner. They're a little thicker/stiffer than a regular sticker, but not by much. I was honestly surprised at how thin they are. One downside is that the paper/ink refills are kind of expensive. (I think it comes out to around $ .75 each print.) Sometimes I print out a collage and cut out the individual photos for separate spreads/days, which helps the refills last longer. I've included a picture so you can see, but I was struggling to get one that was in focus, so It might not be helpful, lol. This is in an A6 planner. https://preview.redd.it/e6wag07zu45g1.jpeg?width=2252&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b1ee3a5efbe2393edce4ff72e1cc011505e0a073

I also love the thinness of the SELPHY compared to the sprocket. I also imagine the washi prints thinner photos too so I am interested in information about how that compares

I have a SELPHY square and the cartridges come with the paper.

I do have the QX10 and I love it. Its not ZINK paper, but just as easy to use (the printing process might take a little longer) and the photos look fantastic.

Its a little more expensive but not by much. Here it would be 50 cents for a photo on ZINK paper and around 70 for one with ink. So depends on where you live and also how many photos you print. And it produces a bit more waste because of the ink cartridges

It generates its own wifi. You connect your phone to the printers wifi basically.

I use the selphy square for adding pictures on the go. It’s dye, so it uses ink, but the cartridges are small, and the photos will last a really long time. It was important to me that the photos had longevity. The selphy paper is sticky. I will add getting the paper can be a little annoying in the states. It used to sell out a lot. I’ve acquired a bit of stockpile so I don’t know if that’s still an issue.

Canon selphy qx10 over here highly recommend it. Got it second hand and it works great. I use my sprocket for general journaling and the selphy for memory journal and my sons memory journal als

A Selphy também tem um custo por foto alto. Por outro lado, as fotos são 10x15, no estilo das antigas fotos de laboratório (que eram 10x15 ou 13x18) e impressas por sublimação, gerando fotos bem resistentes. A Selphy também é portátil (cabe numa bolsa grande ou mochila), mas precisa ser ligada à tomada. Por outro lado, existe uma bateria à parte para ela. Detalhe, recentemente foi lançada uma nova Selphy, a Selphy Square, que imprime fotos menores (68,6x68,6 nice), mais ainda usando o processo de sublimação. Essa nova Selphy é o equivalente mais próximo das Fuji.

A Selphy também tem um custo por foto alto. Por outro lado, as fotos são 10x15, no estilo das antigas fotos de laboratório (que eram 10x15 ou 13x18) e impressas por sublimação, gerando fotos bem resistentes. A Selphy também é portátil (cabe numa bolsa grande ou mochila), mas precisa ser ligada à tomada. Por outro lado, existe uma bateria à parte para ela. Detalhe, recentemente foi lançada uma nova Selphy, a Selphy Square, que imprime fotos menores (68,6x68,6 nice), mais ainda usando o processo de sublimação. Essa nova Selphy é o equivalente mais próximo das Fuji.