ASICS Gel-Kayano 31

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

Overall

#65 in

Road Running Shoes

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score65% positive
43
10
13

Top Pros

Top Cons

Last updated: May 23, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit IconAdSubject7486
8 months ago

Asics hands down! So many shoes to fit everyone's needs! I personally have the Kayano 31s for easy/recovery and SuperBlast 2s for everything else👌

Reddit IconAnxietyChronicles
30 days ago

I walk 15km a day including some running, and therefore go through a pair every few months. I juggle multiple pairs of Asics Gel Kayano 30 (don't like the 31 or 32). If you want insane cushion, go for Hoka Bondi 8 but you will compromise on stability. If you want cushion and stability, either go for Asics Gel Kayano 32 or Asics Gel Nimbus 28. I am not a big fan of Nike Vomero plus (which I also own) because the cushion has a steep fall from heel to toe, which I find uncomfortable. PS I bacially \*live\* in sneakers because I also wear them at work.

Reddit Iconasicsan
24 days ago

A bit delayed with when I wanted to get this out, but finally getting around to this. Be warned, this is fairly lengthy, going into my history with different running shoes before I got the MBs. **Stats** \- Easy Pace = 5:45-6:10/km MP = 4:30-4:45/km Size - UK9/US10. **My Background** \- I have been primarily into S&C with running as an occasional hobby that I indulge in for the most part of my adult life. Started running longer distances back in 2015, and would race the occasional 10k once or twice a year. I never had any structure of program for my runs and would just lace up and go out without much thought into what I would do on the run. Unlike a lot of other runners, I got quite irregular with running during the pandemic and it was only last year, early 2025, that I decided to take up running again primarily for improved cardio vascular health. I had decided to start with some easy runs and build up mileage for the initial few months and then branch out to doing other types of workouts - intervals, tempo, threshold etc. **Shoe History** \- Back in 2010 I was diagnosed with a chronic case of Shin Splints. My physiotherapist recommended I pick-up shoes that provide some stability and arch support since I had flat feet and tended to overpronate when I ran. This led me to picking up the Asics Gel Kayanos 16, a pair of shoes that were prohibitively expensive for broke me, but thankfully I had family support. Since then I have stuck to the Gel Kayanos faithfully, switching from the GK16s to the 24s a few years later (2018). At the start of last year I was still running in the Gel Kayano 24s - which goes to show how little I had run in the 7 years prior - but I also knew I wanted to branch out and try other shoes. After a few months of getting back into the groove of things, and having done enough reading and watching on what shoes I could potentially experiment with, I went with the following pairs: * Gel Kayano 31 - For continued support and stability on easy days. * NovaBlast5 - For faster runs * RebelV4 - An alternative to the NB5s. (Turned out to be a damp squib for me) I ran in the first two for about 5 months, racking in \~550kms in total between the two. As I got closer to my Half-marathon prep in late October 2025 I realized that the NovaBlasts weren’t great for long runs, and the Kayanos were too heavy/felt leaden when I tried to run longer distances and they sucked all joy out of running when I ran in them. I was contemplating getting the Superblast 2’s but by then I had seen enough reviews of the Megablast for me to give that a try. They definitely felt bouncier, more energetic than the SB2 though a lot less stable. I was unsure if these were the best shoes for me, considering the instability, but the practice runs I did at the store felt very good so I took a - very expensive - gamble. **First Run impressions and Break in** \- The first run impressions were anything but good. The shoes felt blocky, uncomfortable and I didn’t feel any sort of energy return that I was hoping from them. I had seen others state the same and that they had to run about 50km before the shoes felt broken into, so I knew my experience wasn’t unique. However, the very next day I felt a huge difference in my run. The bounce/energy return was amazing, and while it did feel unstable, it wasn’t as bad as I thought I would be. Every subsequent run I went on had the opposite effect of buyers’ remorse - I knew I had made the right choice. **Pros** \- ***Variety*** \- In the 4 months since the purchase I’ve racked up over a 1000kms in them, and I have used them for a variety of runs - Easy pace, Sub-threshold, Threshold, Speed/Intervals, Long runs, and even ran a HM in them; they were fantastic for all of these runs. It truly is a terrific all-rounder. ***Legsaver*** \- ‘Sagasu Running’ uses a term called ‘Legsavingsness’ and I must say that this ranks very high up there on that front. I have done multiple runs in excess of 20kms and very rarely have my legs been dead or tired at the end of those. There was some fatigue, of course, but I felt good to go the next day, and the shoes played a major part in that. ***Midsole*** \- I am not going to spend more time on the midsole since I have nothing new to add to what’s already been said multiple times before: it is truly fantastic. ***Durability*** \- Even though I had hit well over 900kms, the shoes/midsole still felt pretty great. Not as bouncy of course, but still plenty of energy return allowing me to do my long runs with little to no discomfort. **Cons** \- ***Width*** \- The width on this shoe is a bit of a bummer. I personally love the race-fit upper, but the narrow fit at the forefoot has caused insane blisters on my pinkies, and is definitely the biggest con of this shoe. If the fit/width was the same as the NB5, then this would be an even better shoe. **YMMV** \- ***The price*** \- Yes, it is an extremely expensive shoe, but given the variety of runs you can do in them, and how many kilometers they seem to last, I think the price is justified. ***Biomechanics*** \- As I mentioned at the start, I have flat feet and tend to overpronate. I ignored these issues and continued to enjoy my runs but the lack of foot and arch strengthening has caught up in the last weeks when I was diagnosed with Posterior Tibial Tendon dysfunction (PTTD), so if you’re someone who has arch/foot issues, do ensure you work on those simultaneously and not take things for granted, especially if you’re considering these - or other non-stability - shoes. **What next** \- I contemplated getting the Puma Velocity Nitro 4, or the Superblast 3 as my next pair but after having run in both, I decided to stick to my MB and get another pair instead. I might still get the VN4 to add to my rotation in the future since I liked the practice runs I did in them at the store. **TL;DR** : Great shoes. Ran a 1000kms in them. Would recommend.

24 days ago

A bit delayed with when I wanted to get this out, but finally getting around to this. Be warned, this is fairly lengthy, going into my history with different running shoes before I got the MBs, so that p **Stats** \- **Age**: 35, Male **Height**: 170cm **Weight**: 64-66kg **Easy Pace** = 5:45-6:10/km **MP** = 4:30-4:45/km **Size** \- UK9/US10. **My Background** \- I have been primarily into S&C with running as an occasional hobby that I indulge in for the most part of my adult life. Started running longer distances back in 2015, and would race the occasional 10k once or twice a year. I never had any structure of program for my runs and would just lace up and go out without much thought into what I would do on the run. Unlike a lot of other runners, I got quite irregular with running during the pandemic and it was only last year, early 2025, that I decided to take up running again primarily for improved cardio vascular health. I had decided to start with some easy runs and build up mileage for the initial few months and then branch out to doing other types of workouts - intervals, tempo, threshold etc. **Shoe History** \- Back in 2010 I was diagnosed with a chronic case of Shin Splints. My physiotherapist recommended I pick-up shoes that provide some stability and arch support since I had flat feet and tended to overpronate when I ran. This led me to picking up the Asics Gel Kayanos 16, a pair of shoes that were prohibitively expensive for broke me, but thankfully I had family support. Since then I have stuck to the Gel Kayanos faithfully, switching from the GK16s to the 24s a few years later (2018). At the start of last year I was still running in the Gel Kayano 24s - which goes to show how little I had run in the 7 years prior - but I also knew I wanted to branch out and try other shoes. After a few months of getting back into the groove of things, and having done enough reading and watching on what shoes I could potentially experiment with, I went with the following pairs: * Gel Kayano 31 - For continued support and stability on easy days. * NovaBlast5 - For faster runs * RebelV4 - An alternative to the NB5s. (Turned out to be a damp squib for me) I ran in the first two for about 5 months, racking in \~550kms in total between the two. As I got closer to my Half-marathon prep in late October 2025 I realized that the NovaBlasts weren’t great for long runs, and the Kayanos were too heavy/felt leaden when I tried to run longer distances and they sucked all joy out of running when I ran in them. I was contemplating getting the Superblast 2’s but by then I had seen enough reviews of the Megablast for me to give that a try. They definitely felt bouncier, more energetic than the SB2 though a lot less stable. I was unsure if these were the best shoes for me, considering the instability, but the practice runs I did at the store felt very good so I took a - very expensive - gamble. **First Run impressions and Break in** \- The first run impressions were anything but good. The shoes felt blocky, uncomfortable and I didn’t feel any sort of energy return that I was hoping from them. I had seen others state the same and that they had to run about 50km before the shoes felt broken into, so I knew my experience wasn’t unique. However, the very next day I felt a huge difference in my run. The bounce/energy return was amazing, and while it did feel unstable, it wasn’t as bad as I thought I would be. Every subsequent run I went on had the opposite effect of buyers’ remorse - I knew I had made the right choice. **Pros** \- ***Variety*** \- In the 4 months since the purchase I’ve racked up over a 1000kms in them, and I have used them for a variety of runs - Easy pace, Sub-threshold, Threshold, Speed/Intervals, Long runs, and even ran a HM in them; they were fantastic for all of these runs. It truly is a terrific all-rounder. ***Legsaver*** \- ‘Sagasu Running’ uses a term called ‘Legsavingsness’ and I must say that this ranks very high up there on that front. I have done multiple runs in excess of 20kms and very rarely have my legs been dead or tired at the end of those. There was some fatigue, of course, but I felt good to go the next day, and the shoes played a major part in that. ***Midsole*** \- I am not going to spend more time on the midsole since I have nothing new to add to what’s already been said multiple times before: it is truly fantastic. ***Durability*** \- Even though I had hit well over 900kms, the shoes/midsole still felt pretty great. Not as bouncy of course, but still plenty of energy return allowing me to do my long runs with little to no discomfort. **Cons** \- ***Width*** \- The width on this shoe is a bit of a bummer. I personally love the race-fit upper, but the narrow fit at the forefoot has caused insane blisters on my pinkies, and is definitely the biggest con of this shoe. If the fit/width was the same as the NB5, then this would be an even better shoe. **YMMV** \- ***The price*** \- Yes, it is an extremely expensive shoe, but given the variety of runs you can do in them, and how many kilometers they seem to last, I think the price is justified. ***Biomechanics*** \- As I mentioned at the start, I have flat feet and tend to overpronate. I ignored these issues and continued to enjoy my runs but the lack of foot and arch strengthening has caught up in the last weeks when I was diagnosed with Posterior Tibial Tendon dysfunction (PTTD), so if you’re someone who has arch/foot issues, do ensure you work on those simultaneously and not take things for granted, especially if you’re considering these - or other non-stability - shoes. **What next** \- I contemplated getting the Puma Velocity Nitro 4, or the Superblast 3 as my next pair but after having run in both, I decided to stick to my MB and get another pair instead. I might still get the VN4 to add to my rotation in the future since I liked the practice runs I did in them at the store. **TL;DR**: Great shoes. Ran a 1000kms in them. Would recommend.

24 days ago

I have tried the Evo SLs only once and I didn't them comfortable to run in, so I can't comment on them. These are similar to the NB5 but has more cushioning/stack height, and therefore will likely feel unstable. FWIW, I only felt it initially but in these 1000km+ that I have run in, I have had little to no issues despite constantly turning on my runs and running a U-bend (horse-shoe style) repeatedly on almost all my runs. If you're worried, try them out before you purchase them.

24 days ago

I had read online that the blistering was an issue, and even when I wore them at the store I felt that the shoe had a very snug fit compared to the NB5 or the SB2, so I was slightly concerned. I didn't feel the effects of it until my first long run in them, post which my right pinky had a blister like an inflated hot air balloon over Cappadocia. What I've also realised with the newer pair of MB's that I've bought is that this occurs only when I go with the runners knot. When I tied my laces like I would a normal shoe, I felt I had a lot more space in my forefoot and could spread my toes out.

Reddit IconCharacter-Bread-673
5 months ago

Thank you! Just curious as i use the kayano 31 as well, but am just a casual runner. Might aim for some 5k pb’s in future though!

Reddit IconCodPuzzled639
6 months ago

Hi everyone, As the title says, I'm a heavy runner with flat feet. 194cm 100kg. Feet always large for every trainer ever. I started running last year and recently been having much more fun. I went from a pace of 7:00min/km to 6:00min/km. I normally use Asics Gel Kayano 31, but I'm looking for something that feels better. The Asics are great, I feel that my feet actually have a platform and there is no stability issues, but it lacks shock absorption and energy return. At least the shock absorption needs to be better. I bought some Mizuno Neo Zen in discount, tried them out and did my fastest race ever. But unfortunately, I feel that my right foot is slipping from the shoe to the inside, I can't really explain. And it creates some tension on my right leg to compensate, which is tiring. Left foot is fine, confortable and bouncy. Is it just a question of adaptation, as my left foot is fine? Or are these not the trainers for me? Am I stuck to unresponsive, boring stability shoes? Do you guys have any recommendation? Thank you.

Reddit IconCompetitive_South194
2 months ago

Flat feet = good cushioned shoes. I can suggest Asics Kayano 31 from my experience

Reddit IconDogNightWalker
5 months ago

Haluuu! I began running with a Gel Kayano 31 while I was building my fitness. But through months of running and occasional strength training (which I recommend you do, not just occasionally!) my feet can already tolerate neutral shoes. So overpronation can be improved with strength training and consistent running!

Reddit IconElComal_
10 months ago

I looked into the Puma Velocity Nitro 3s and actually ordered the ASICS Gel Kayano 31s but I realized how much exposed foam there was on the outsole. I’m sure it would wear away very quickly and possibly start to peel away the actual rubber itself like it did with the 1906r’s (pictures above)

Rankings by Use Case

Top recommendations from others in the same boat

Other Reddit Recommendations: