ASICS - GT-2000 6

When I started running, I was put in Asics by the local running shoe store experts. That shoe (GT 2000 3) for well in standard width even though I've mostly needed wide fit. Then my next pair was the same model in a wide fit, but somehow they were narrower than my first pair. For my next pair, I tried moving up to the GT 2000 6, also in wide fit. They were better, but still didn't feel as good as my first pair of Asics. For my daily wear shoes, I've been wearing Adidas and Nike wide fit for over 20 years. I've switched to Nike for my running shoes in the last 5 years. For me, the fit is much more important than the technology. I don't want to spend too much, so I'm probably using low to mid-tier running shoes, and I've tried several models that I rotate between. I've been rotating between Zoom Structure, Pegasus, Winflow, and Vomero since last August. The first two were from right before the COVID shutdowns in 2020, and then I didn't run for almost 3 years. After being much more consistent in my training, I'm between 300 and 400 miles on all 4 pairs and will need to replace them soon.

I tried Saucony Tempus 1 but immediately got blisters under my arch due to the high and dense arch support. Just for OP to know, in case he also has issues there. Had the same problems with Nike Structure 25 and earlier models of the GT2000 (years ago! In an Asics store they told me, that they don't use those kind of arch support anymore und the current Kayano feel fine for me)

Additional 10% off if you're a new customer as well! GT-2000s are my go-to as well. Can't seem to justify more expensive shoes when these work so well

I pronate and have had to deal with interior tibial tendinitis - shoe wise, I have used Brooks glycerine gts, Saucony Tempus and ASICS GT-2000s all with good success. I usually supplement with Spenco Total Support high arch insoles. I run everything 5k through marathon (Marathon #3 is in 2 weeks.)

As a former employee of a specialty running footwear shop I can say that the training done (at least where I worked) definitely puts a lot of emphasis on what pronation is. The problem is that most just ignore the fact that you want to see multiple signals before going for a stability shoe and instead bring out three shoes you mentioned as the standard three whenever there’s the tiniest bit of pronation. If you get pain in certain areas while on your feet (especially when running) then stability potentially could be an option depending on the pain. If you are wanting to follow their recommendations but want something with a bit more of a lively feeling then the Saucony Tempus is a really good option, it’s lively and more of a stable shoe rather than support (guides the foot rather than forces the foot). The Asics GT-2000 is also a decent option and is almost like a hybrid between the Novablast 5 and Kayano 32 (lower stack, responsive foam, mild stability on medial side of the foot).

Also an Asics fan. I alternate between the GT-2000 and the Gel-Keyano. I wear narrows, so I am limited to certain models.

When I started running 10 years ago I went to a local store to buy the right pair for me. I ended up getting GT-2000 because they said I was pronating. After my first 10km easy run I started having knee pain I never had. Returned the pair and bought neutral shoes and the knee pain disappeared. I think the diagnosis for pronation was good but the correction with the GT2000 was to important for me. As some people said here, better buy neutral one and if you have doubts, go see a professional that will adjust soles for you

Easy runs: asics kayano Intervals: Adios pro 4 Long easy runs: asics gt 2000 Long runs with target pace: Adios pro 4

K32 brought me back from over pronation injury, they are great, however they are a slow shoe. I also tried the Gt 2000 but that was too firm and preferred the k32. Eventually I got custom orthotics and now run in the megablasts as my daily

I wanna say that I’m literally in the same boat as you, as in your description of who you are is very similar to me. I used to exclusively run in Pegasus back when I would just jog a little bit and wasn’t a serious runner. When I started training, I switched to the asics gt-2000 and it was such a game changer. It’s a much better support shoe. I’ve tried both the kayano and gt-2000 for half marathons up to 30k distance and definitely think the kayano is hot and heavy and would only use it for a long distance if the weather is cold. That being said, if the gt-2000’s were not good enough for you, stability wise, hence trying the pegasus, then I’d recommend trying the kayano. It might be hot and heavy, but it’s going to give you good cushioning and solid stability, regardless of the length of your run. Sometimes I can use non-stability shoes for shorter runs, but the longer the distance the more I feel the lack of support. I’m currently attempting to see if I can use the hoka mach x2 as my new speed and possible race shoe as it seems to be relatively more stable than many typical “racer-style” shoes, but it obviously doesn’t offer the kind of stability you’d get from a dedicated stability shoe, but there are no stability shoes specifically for racing so this was the best that I could find so far. I know you didn’t explicitly ask about that, but I thought I’d just throw that out there. They do run narrow though, but as long as I have the perfect size for both feet (which for me literally meant buying two separate sizes for each foot) then I can get away with it not being a stability shoe because they both hug my feet perfectly, which kind of mimics a little bit of stability. I tried the same thing with say the asics novablast but since the mesh is so stretchy and doesn’t hug my foot, my ankle basically just kept turning the entire time and they were horrible, even with an insole, which I was hoping would offset the lack of stability in the shoe, but didn’t. Oh yes, and another tip! Try an insole! If you don’t want to buy a new pair of shoes, you might be able to just buy an insole to fit your existing shoes which might help a little bit. Good luck!

From what you've mentioned, I think the Asics GT-2000 might be what you're looking for. Stack height isn't high like most running shoes and is pretty decent. If it's above budget, try looking for some older models. The other one that is similar, more raved about, and tends to go on sale is the Puma Velocity 4. But Puma runs narrow so definitely go try the fit. Or you can also consider the Adidas SL2 as well, stack is slightly higher but not crazy high. If you don't mind trying higher stacks that are beginner friendly shoes, I suggest the Adidas Adizero EVO SL. Fun, bouncy, decent price that should fit your budget. Also my starter shoe was the Asics Novablast (I got the 4 on sale, 5 is the current model). Just some recs to keep in mind because running shoe shopping is fun but can definitely get overwhelming. Like everyone else said, I'd go in-store and try a bunch to see what you like. You can either go to these brand shops or go to a multi-brand running shoe shop to try multiple brands.