HOKA Skyward X

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

Overall

#151 in

Road Running Shoes

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score78% positive
21
1
5
Last updated: May 23, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit Iconablebody_95
6 months ago

I rotate between 6-8 pairs, so I suggest getting at least two pairs. As far as what to suggest; running shoes are extremely personal. Everyone is different. I’ve been loving Adidas Adizero EVO SLs, ASICs Superblast 2s, Hoka Skyward X for those middle distance easy runs, Adidas Boston 13s for threshold work, Saucony Endorphin Speeds for threshold, and I also have a stable of race shoes (Nike Vaporflys, Alphaflys) for intervals and racing.

6 months ago

Saucony Endorphin Speed Asics Superblast 2 NB SC Trainer Hoka Skyward X (plated super stacked trainer and my go-to long easy run shoe). Adidas Adizero EVO SL

3 months ago

Don't blast them until you try them. I love my big stack shoes. My favorite long runs shoes are the ASICs Megablasts and Hoka Skyward X. I also love Adidas EVO SLs. Race shoes are Nike Vapor Flys, Alpha FLys, and Adidas Pro 4s.

Reddit IconBadAsianDriver
5 months ago

Neo Zen is bouncy AF. Skyward X is also bouncy and makes you 3 inches taller.

Reddit IconConstant-Practice-50
6 months ago

I own the SB and Skyward X. The SB is definitely the fastest and lightest, they were my go to long run workout shoe. Hated them for anything short or recovery. The Skyward is a great long run shoe, I put some serious miles in my pair. But its a tank and feels like it on foot. The Puma is the most versatile of the bunch. It’s big but doesn’t feel like. They’re stable and protective and have a natural feel. They also have the best upper, super comfortable. I’ve used these for big long runs, short runs and recovery. They’re decent for speed but its size shoes up when picking up the pace.

Reddit IconEmergencySundae
6 months ago

* Easy/Recovery: Hoka Skyflow (52 mi) - Honestly, not my favorite shoe, but I bought them so I'll keep using them. It's probably back to my trusty Rincons after these are done. * Speed: Hoka Mach X (224 mi) - Still one of my favorites, especially for tempo runs. * Speed: Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 (225 mi) - The original speed was one of the first shoes I fell in love with, and this shoe has different mechanics from the Mach X. * Long/Race: New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 (190 mi/19mi) - I have two pairs. One that I've done all of my long marathon training runs in, and the new pair that I'm using for Philly this weekend and then Love Run in March. I wanted something wider and cushioned enough for longer runs, and while these aren't the fastest supershoes I've ever used, they're certainly reliable enough for 26.2. Ideally I'll replace them with the Cielo X1 3 when they're released. * Race: Hoka Rocket X 2 (146 mi) - I think these have one more race in them and then they'll be relegated to training. I adore this shoe and have to decide if I grab another pair or go with the 3 when I replace them. Also in my closet but not currently in use: * Brooks Ghost 15 (136 mi) - These feel like having a 2x4 strapped to your foot. They really ruined the shoe with this model and it's made me hesitant to try Brooks again. * Hoka Clifton 9 (153 mi) - I like the Clifton, they're just not ones I reach for on a regular basis. * Hoka Mach 5 (153 mi) - I bought these because of the hype around them, which I ended up not agreeing with. They're "fine" enough. * Hoka Skyward X (113 mi) - I've tried on and off to use these, but they make my peroneal tendonitis flare up. * New Balance More v4 (155 mi) - Another shoe that was overhyped for me. They never felt as "plush" as others talked about. * Saucony Endorphin Pro 4 (65 mi) - I bought these to use for my half marathon last year because of how much I loved the previous version. I strongly dislike this as a half/full marathon shoe because of the firmness, and it's not comfortable over 9 miles, to the point where I ended up using my almost-dead 3s for the race. They don't have a place in my rotation because the Rocket is a more aggressive shoe over the 5K/10K distance. I may end up using them for speed work when my current speed shoes are done.

Reddit IconExpensive-Sea-9180
9 months ago

I have run a marathon in the Skyward X: would  not recommend.  They’re far too heavy and excessively stiff to the point that my feet hurt whenever I pick up the pace. Sub 5-hour marathon, maybe. Sub 4:30, definitely not

Reddit IconGoutRunner
6 months ago

Oh, nice. Do you like them? Do they protect your toes? I have hallux rigidus and wear Hoka Skyward X for the same reason. They are great and I like them but they are pricey. I’d like an alternative. Have been curious about ASICS Magic Speed 4. Have you tried those?

Reddit IconHaptics
10 months ago

Skyward X is definitely a treat but it’s really difficult to justify the extra cost imo, they trend more towards easy long run shoes than true easy/recovery day shoes and I think most of the other options here are going to be just as good for shorter easy runs. That said they are definitely remarkable shoes and I love mine.

Reddit IconHeystaap
2 months ago

Just got to 200 miles after a 20 mile long run this weekend on the Asics Megablasts and I have very mixed feelings. I'm currently training for a sub 2:50 marathon attempt using a hybrid between Pfitz 18/55 and 18/70. My recent Prs are a 17:40 5k and a 2:54 marathon last June. I've been a complete sucker for the Asics super trainers since I bought the OG superblast for training in my first marathon in 2024. Given that inventory is always tight and hype is absurd, I bought the superblast 2 pre-release and then the megablast pre-release as well. Jumping on the megablast pre-release feels extra ridiculous because I didn't really love the superblast 2's. They were too firm for slow/recovery mileage for me, but then too heavy and sluggish for workouts. It worked best in a goldilocks zone around 8:15-7:15 per mile pace. The megablast is better than superblast 2 in my opinion, but it shares a lot of the same issues. **Pros:** \-The durability is absurd so far. At 200 miles there's no major wear and the section that I normally chew through (left shoe lateral midfoot) is untouched. There are shoes (skyward x) where I've shaved off huge portions of this section off before 100 miles. Not so with the megablast. I'm sure if I wanted to take it well over 500 miles I could. \-It's fairly light (8.1 oz mens size 9) and natural feeling. My long run wasn't exactly fun yesterday, but the shoe got the job done and felt better the more I ran in it. I got down to around 7:00 per mile from miles 13-16 and the ride was mildly bouncy, stable and protective. I feel like it definitely has more pace versatility than the superblast 2. **Cons:** \-The upper. This is the only shoe where I've actively gotten blisters multiple times. I've started using bodyglide on my feet with the megablast to make sure I don't get rubbing on the side of my little toes and the bottom of my big toes. Initially the upper feels good, nice lockdown, but man, it is oddly abrasive and has wrecked a few long runs for me. \-The ride is solid and dependable, but I've never found it fun exactly. I've seen so many reviewers talk about the amazing bounce from the ATPU foam, but I've never felt it. To me it feels like a solid, dense, somewhat firm daily trainer. Like a higher stack amalgamation of the novablast 5, mach 6 and glycerin max. Maybe it's because I actively use race shoes for my workouts/training, but the megablast ultimately feels pretty muted to me. I recently got the NB elite v5 for half off and had such a fun time running my LT repeats in them and my favorite long runs are the ones I've done in race shoes. In comparison the megablast does not feel great at my faster paces. This ties back into what I said about the superblast 2- the megablast is solid and has more pace versatility, but to me feel it feels like a master of none. I wouldn't do recovery runs in them (I'd use the nimbus) and the few workouts I've done have been the sloggiest, hardest runs of the training block. Like the superblast it works best in (wider) goldilocks range of like 8:30-6:50 mile pace. \-Which leads to a huge con: the price, $225. For the price and hype I was expecting a lot and it hasn't met those high expectations. And with the upper issues I might just buy another pair of EVO SL's, which I think is a way better buy, even if it has a clunky upper as well. I think the Megablast should be $190 max. I'm hoping the evo and azura start to make the super trainer market more competitive price wise. I think I'm taking a break on the Asics hype train, and I'm mildly proud of myself for not immediately pre-ordering the superblast 3 (though with my new shoe addiction I thought about it). Curious about other peoples thoughts, I know I'm probably in the minority on being this mixed/lukewarm.

2 months ago

I thought the skyward x was super bouncy and fun, but much heavier than mega and the durability was not as good- my left shoe was super shaved down at like 300 miles. I think you’ll have fun!

Rankings by Use Case

Top recommendations from others in the same boat

Other Reddit Recommendations: