C1

I wrote a review for the Mount to Coast C1. I've run 159miles in the shoe. I got an automated take down, I think because I don't have enough karma. \--- Met some of the M2C PR staff at The Running Event. They seeded me the C1 for testing in early February. Bought the H1s with my own money, but these were free. Since then, I've put 159 miles on them. I'm 5'11, 150lbs. Just ran a half marathon PB of 1:10:20 (in the On Cloudboom Strike). TLDR: Great long run shoe, great pace versatility, questionable outsole durability, relatively good value at $180, true to size. — M2C took the circle cell foam that made the H1 really good and put it into a road-focused, high stack, non-plated trainer. It's been great to me. It competes directly with the Asics Superblast and the Mizuno Neo Vista. For me, it competes indirectly with Vomero Plus (which is more narrow, features a more aggressive geometry, and a bouncier foam), the Brooks Hyperion Max 3, and barely the Puma Mag Max (leans more recovery, not so versatile). What most people will be excited to hear: C1 can run slow or fast very comfortably. The heel bevel and forefoot rocker are super accommodating. I think people who run easy at 12min per mile and people who run easy at 7min per mile can both like this shoe. I've run some really good workouts in this shoe. Normally nothing faster than threshold pace. I've done marathon pace work, some grind-y long runs in the low 6s, and some hills at half marathon pace. The shoe's toe isn't necessarily helping you pick up the pace, but it's not stopping you at all, and it's not demanding that you strike in some specific way. For example, I did a 22 mile long run in sub6 minute average, and it was fine for the whole thing. There were some 5:15s in there and a couple of 7 flats in that effort. I finished the run and was of course hurting, but my feet were well protected the whole time with some hills in there on what was overall a really big effort. In terms of non-plated racing options for a full marathon, this has to be up there with SuperBlast and MegaBlast. It's been a cold winter, but I think the upper will breathe well in hotter climates. The shoe is a pontoon boat, a wide platform from front to back, but it's not heavy and in my opinion it's not slow. The C1 is good on wet pavement. The traction isn't good on snow or ice, just looking at the outsole it's not surprising. In contrast the M2C H1 is a great road shoe for bad/winter conditions. On the C1, the rubberized EVA layer on the outsole is relatively soft. It grips pavement well but is wearing through faster than I'd like. I noticed when M2C advertises shoes lasting X miles for Y days of Z ultra marathon, they rarely show the bottoms. I don't have experience with the R1 (hopefully soon). The H1 traction is nuts, hasn't changed at all in 100 miles of winter road, light trail, and treadmill running. It seems like the rubberized EVA carrier is going to wear down before the circle cell foam or the upper. I'd like to get at least 400 miles out of any shoe that costs over $160, but I'm not sure that's going to happen here. Additionally, the circle cell foam is starting to feel not super protective in my H1s after just about 200 miles...we'll see. Out of the box, the circle cell foam felt great. It draws comparison to LightStrikePro. It's relatively firm and super responsive, not squishy, not bouncy but comfortable and resilient. Ready for anything really. There's good sidewalls on this shoe, I'd call it stable neutral. There's a pretty plush sockliner as well for improved step in feel. The toe box of the C1 is wider than most brands, which is typical for M2C, not quite anatomical (like Topo or Altra) but just accommodating. I think accommodating is a great thing for a running shoe to be. When my foot swells during a long run, the extra toe box room is great. But it's not a sloppy fit. My ankle and midfoot are secure in the shoe. The dual lacing is a bit gimmicky, but it doesn't bother me. It takes me slightly longer to lace it up than a standard road shoe...but if I were running longer than 2.5 hours, I think this feature could be useful. I like the look of the shoe. I wanted the black version to hide the sweat and deal with the dirt better. Both the white upper and insides of this shoe got stained from me wearing black socks. Additionally, if they remove one or two branding elements (typeface, little logos, etc) it'd be even better. — Buy it at full price for $180? Yes. For $180, this is a better shoe than the Neo Vista 2 (it has more pace versatility) and depending on outsole durability, this might be a better value than the Megablast or Superblast 3. I haven't tested those shoes, so I can't speak to the performance or longevity of FF Leap...but this shoe is really good. Overall Grade: A- Changes: Give us a better rubberized EVA compound or some actual outsole rubber. I'd even be fine with a little more weight in exchange for more durability. Can't argue with a shoe that fits true to size, no hot spots on the upper, can run fast and slow, and can do a 150 minute long run. Big picture brand discussion: What I initially liked about M2C was their marketing around durability. There's an obvious planned obsolescence around running footwear that keeps us coming back for more. I hope that M2C fulfills their promise of making products for athletes who transcend distance, not just for ultra-marathoners, but for high-mileage grinders. M2C makes a product that feels differentiated right now on the material side of things, but there seems to be a compromise around durability here. While they're currently charging less than standard market rate for a shoe like the C1 (maybe $20-40 less than their competition), they will eventually adjust prices once they're no longer a "challenger" brand. If this shoe was $200 or $220, I wouldn't be recommending it so highly. If I have to retire this shoe at 360 miles, then the grade comes down to a B. Other shoes I've liked: Mizuno Neo Vista 2, Topo Specter 2, Mount to Coast H1, Topo Atmos 1, Adizero SL 2 Other shoes I didn't like: Brooks Adrenaline 25, New Balance SC Elite V4, Craft Endurance 2

I think you're guaranteed 4-500miles at least out of each shoe. You nailed the use cases. The C1 is a great daily trainer to threshold pace shoe. The H1 is a great travel shoe. I had it in my head that I'd get each shoe closer to 700-800miles based on marketing. I think you're guaranteed 500miles out of each. Both are good shoes. Compared to other brands, they're just fine in terms of durability. I'm not sure they're quite living up to the marketing. The claims they make around circle cell are like...same energy return as PEBA but 50% more durable or something like that? An of course peba is a vague label as there's tons of different kinds.

based on my miles, I would not describe the foam as dead. I ran about 160miles in my pair (given to me in February because I met someone from M2C at TRE) and could threshold pace in them no problem. I could run marathon pace in them no problem and ran multiple marathon sessions in them, including a 22mile long run at 5:53per mile pace. I understand why reviewers are using the word "dead" but when I pick the pace, the shoe responds really well. It's far better than the Neo Vista 2 at these speeds. I can't speak to the Superblast or Megablast. I also don't find the fit/shape of the shoe to be a limiting factor for speed. Considering this shoe only for recovery miles or zone 2 running is doing it a disservice.

I just picked these up and holy cow these are a godsend for someone needing lateral stability, wider mid/forefoot and firm without being sloppy. Tried the V+ and it worked fine for a while but started giving me some problems with its high stack and drop combo.

I feel like I’ve been on the same journey with Vomero Plus + Boston 13 as my starting rotation, and ended up with the Superblast 2 being my GOAT shoes. Mixing in Mount to Coast C1 and Alphafly 3 for easy/tempo.

I weigh 282 at 6’1. My long run favorite is the Mount to Coast C1 but I only tested it for a first 12 mile run yesterday. Exceeded expectations, stable and fast. It cruises effortlessly even when form gets sloppy. My previous one was the Asics SB2 and I really love that one as well, really perfect steady speed even at lower paces. This one can get wobbly when form gets worse later in the run. I also use the Saucony Endorphin Azura for longer runs in which I want to pick up the pace. They require a bit more effort and higher cadence but they handle my weight exceptionally well.

Did a 12 mile with these out of the box yesterday. They are a game changer for me as well! I was so sceptic about them before I tried them but now I’m convinced the pair of SB2’s I have been saving just for long runs will start gathering dust

Any width concerns? Also, any overpronation issues with your feet or ankles? If no to both of those, grab a pair of Nike Vomero Plus. They were my shoe of the year in 2025. Great blend of cushioning and responsive feel from the ZoomX. Another new shoe that just dropped that I’m loving is the Mount to Coast C1 if you can get it. Or, to be obvious, the Superblast 2 or 3 would fit the bill. Can get the 2 for like $150 right now; only main difference between the 2 and 3 is that the 3 is a bit softer underfoot with some more pep.

Vomero Plus, Superblast 2 or 3 (2 if you like a slightly firmer feel), Glycerin Max (1 not 2 if you can get it on sale), or Mount to Coast C1. All great long distance cruising shoes for bigger runners. I’m 6’3” 235 lbs.

It should be out in early April, but the Mount to Coast C1 will be right up your alley. I just set a new half marathon PR by 8 mins in NYC. It feels a lot like the Superblast 2 but with a far more accommodating fit and dual lacing system. Doesn’t come in wide but you should have enough room.

Just bought a pair at a race expo and so far have liked them in the shakeout run. They seemed quick and what I was really happy about is they do not squeak like the R1s. There was a person walking behind me and I could tell he had the R1s based on the noise. I also like the white with the red accents looks real good.  Still need to take them on a long run but I have high expectations. 

I did my first run into them today and the foam is definitely not dead. It’s more of a responsive cruiser than a megablast type shoe though. Very stable, nice rocker, great fit.

Mount to coast C1 has changed my long run life

They are extremely comfortable, stable, with just enough pep to them. They fit is accommodating and adjustable. I run between 14-22 mile long runs in them and the quick adjust is nice as my feet swell.

At 6’4 and 103kg, my go to have been Asics Superblast 2, Asics Megablast, Saucony EP 4, Adidas Evo SL Woven for 10k/track workouts (I also use Currex Runpro insoles in some of my shoes like this one), Adidas Adios Pro 3 and recently Mount to Coast C1. On the trail- Nnormal Tomir 2, HOKA Mafate Speed 4, Asics Trabuco Max 2/3 and soon Mount to Coast M1. Mount to Coast also has an excellent road-to-trail shoe H1(mostly fire road/gravel/light trail)