New Balance - Fresh Foam X 860v14

I think it’s all dependent on personal preference. I tend to like a little bit more cushioning and moderate support and i pronate a bit. I’m using the NB 860 v14 and they’ve been great. I’ve also just picked up the Puma Magmax 2 and put in some mild support insoles. They’ve been great. Very cushioned and provide enough cushioning for me knees. I would suggest going to a specialty store and try them all on.

Everybody's feet are different, so that's a tough answer. I have collapsed arches and over-pronate, fairly severely with my left foot, and have had varying success with wildly different shoes. The key for me is a stable heel matched to a non-intrusive arch. I had to trial and error quite a bit with different shoes. I like running in the Saucony Hurricane 24 because it has a lot of good cushion, a lot of different stability elements going on, without having a traditional medial post. There's enough cushion that I feel protected, matched with enough guidance that I'm not moving/wobbling excessively anywhere. The New Balance 860v14 is similar for me, though it's less exciting and the arch-support is slightly more intrusive. I tried the Saucony Hurricane 25 on in store and they seem lighter and a touch more sporty feeling. The Saucony Triumph 20 oddly enough works great for me as well because the lockdown is flawless for me in addition to a stable feeling heel. I think a good, stable heel keeps my inner-ankle from rotating inward and is just enough that I'm not beating up my foot/arch. These next two are really oddballs for me and it took me years to even consider giving them a shot.  On a whim I tried a Saucony Kinvara 15 and Altra Escalante 4 recently and love them both.  I always figured this type of shoe would never ever work for me, but they do.  The light, low, firm setup is inherently stable and the ground-feel allows me to really focus on my form: not slamming my feet or heels down, running quietly is what I tell myself.  I think many shoes just have too much height and squish that allows too much movement for me and lower stack, firmer shoes leave less room for error.  The Kinvara feels both light and minimal but just protective enough at the same time. They also have minimal arch-humps so I never feel uncomfortable pressure there. I keep runs in these shoes less than 5 miles since they're on the more minimal side. Here are some that did not work for me: Saucony Guide 16: horrible, painful stiff medial post, slappy shoe New Balance 860v12: too firm, invasive arch New Balance 1080v12: insane instability Adidas Adizero SL2: I occasionally use these but they are very soft with minimal structure Topo Fly-lite 5: rock-hard, invasive arch support, wildly uncomfortable Brooks Adrenaline GTS 19: like running in a wooden clog 

I think it depends on which model. I’ve compared NB 860v14 in 2E and 4E side by side and the 4E does have a wider sole.

Ik heb nu new Balance 860 v14. Ben er heel blij mee.

I use the Genesis for trails (great shoe) and the Kayano 32 for some easy recovery runs. I have used the NB860v14 but found it kinda clunky and slow. I would suggest trying the Salomon Aero Glide 3 or 4 (3 is on sale if you can find it). They have the same midsole/outsole, just an updated upper on the 4. It's listed as a neutral shoe but it definitely has some stability to resist over-pronation. I use it for all structured workouts and long runs but could use it every day. It's much lighter and snappier, with great energy return compared to the NB860, GT-4000, or Kayano. I also use the Brooks Glycerin Max for easy runs and really like it - very, very smooth heel-to-toe transition with elements that make it feel stable.

I have the 860v14, the Tempus 2, and the Adrenaline GTS 24. Note that I'm a heavier runner, at 90kg. * The 860v14 feels nice and plush to walk in, but when running in them it seems as though I'm instantly bottoming them on each footstrike, so the brunt of the impact feels abrupt and firm. This isn't a dealbreaker, the ride experience isn't bad per se, but it means the shoe doesn't feel as cush as I was expecting it to when I first did a walk test in them. The gusset on the tongue also digs into my right midfoot on the lateral side, which is annoying but not a serious concern. * I don't mind the Adrenaline GTS 24. They're firmer than the 860v14, the foam has a dense squish to it which absorbs impact and makes my feet feel well-protected while running. For some reason Brooks decided to reduce the forefoot volume in the shoe though, so it was a bit constrictive until I broke them in (though the shoe comes in wide sizes so if you try them on in store you may be able to deal with this), and the heel collar sits lower than I'd like. * I'm going to be the possibly lone voice of dissent here and say that I absolutely hate the Tempus 2, and consider my purchase of this shoe to be a mistake. I bought this shoe hoping for a stable and protective yet responsive shoe for long runs, but the ride experience for me has been dominated by the *incredibly* firm and unpleasant EVA stability frame abusing my midfoot. It's a really unpleasant thing to land on over and over again. I feel that I only ever get the responsive character of the PEBA parts of the midsole when I'm running downhill, at which point, to its credit, it does start doing the "shoe doing the running for you" supershoe thing. The rest of the time the PEBA is just not a pronounced part of the ride experience. I'm hoping that the shoe will break in and start actually protecting my feet (I've put 35km on it so far), but I'll likely write it off as a loss once my pair of Puma MagMax arrives. Oh, and the upper is tacky synthetic garbage, the uppers on every other shoe mentioned here are far superior. Hope the above helps. I seem to be a lone voice of dissent on the Tempus 2 so you might want to either go with the popular acclaim and give them a shot anyway, or ideally try them on in store before you decide. That said, if I were making this decision, I'd try to snag a pair of 860v14's on steep discount for walking and possibly some easy runs (NB has had some crazy sales), and grab a pair of Brooks Hyperion GTS 2's. As far as stability running shoe quality goes, the Hyperion GTS 2 is really in a league of its own in just about every regard.

Hey! I have a very similar problem and usually have to wear men’s as my feet are so wide, but ofc this means the colours are super boring :( that being said, I own a pair of new balance 860v14 in women’s D, in a very cute pastel blue colour which I love! Highly recommend. The saucony guide 17 in D also comes in a navy blue and pink colour which is quite nice too :)

No problem at all! They’re super comfortable as well (my current go-to shoe). New balance is the only brand I’ve found that still has some decent colours for us wide foot girls! The 1080s and rebel v4 are neutral and also come in D, but depending on how much stability you need these are also great options and come in amazing colours :)

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860V14 - the perfect all day / walking shoe and I have looked long and hard at this, also ideal if you are looking for a shoe with a slightly wider toe box but don’t want a ‘clown’ type shoe.

Strongly second this ^^. The Adrenaline didn't work out for me, though I ran a PB at a half marathon. The 860 is a good, albeit boring shoe. The Tempus, IMO, is one of the best and most responsive/faster stability shoes out there. I've heard great things about the Kayano. Some shoes have more discreet stability while others (less common nowadays) have a lot more stability elements in them, so try them on and see which feels better for you.

I've run in each shoe over many years. Whether it's Hurricane, 860, or Kayano, they employ similar features to reduce pronation and to improve alignment. A wide straight last platform, raised sidewalls, firmer foam, wedges, beveling, and rigid designs work together to reduce pronation and torsion. It's the degree of stability and ride quality that differ between the three. The Kayano 32 is a beast. It's noticeably firmer and stiff. It provides maximum stability and protection. It can be used day in and day out for slow basic training. It's a durable tank of a shoe. The tradeoff is a heavy, clunky, and plodding ride. The 860 has a softer feel and is less invasive. The support feels more natural and the ride is more forgiving. It uses geometry and a thin plastic film to improve stability and return energy, which gets cancelled out by the heavy weight and feel. It's not as durable as Kayano. I like the Vongo v6, but it isn't as stable or cushioned as 860. Saucony Hurricane 24 offers mild stability and a highly cushioned ride. It's the least restrictive of the three. Saucony reintroduced this model and designed it to be a plush max cushioned trainer. The weight and bulky/clunky ride held this version back. I currently run in Saucony Hurricane 25. At least for me, Saucony solved the weight and ride problems of the previous version. It's still a big shoe, but the ride is noticeably lighter and energetic. I'm hard on shoes and so far I can't put a dent in them. My Kayano 32s are retired from running. I use them as a work, gym, or walking shoe. I also recommend checking out Brooks Glycerin GTS 22. It strikes a good balance between stability and cushioning. The ride is smooth and there is a slight pop coming from the DNA tuned midsole. It's currently on discount as Brooks ushers in the 23s.

I have experience running in all of the shoes you've listed. The best all around shoe for walking and running would be the Kayano. The upper is more plush and comfortable, and they offer good support and cushioning. Adrenalines are the firmest of the four. The Tempus is the quickest and most versatile for running, but it's not my go to for walking. I didn't get along well with the 860s personally because they felt too bottom heavy and unresponsive to me.

Having run in stability models across major brands, New Balance (860v14, Vongo V6), Saucony (Guide 17, Tempus 2), Asics (Kayano 32, GT 2000 13), and Brooks (Adrenaline GTS 24, Glycerin GTS 22), I can say New Balance's Fresh Foam with embedded stability planes offers a distinctly plush experience.The 860 and Vongo are the plushest stability shoes I've run in, with the Vongo delivering a ride similar to the neutral 1080 v14 but with added stability. Since you're loving the 860, I'd skip the Kayano 32. It's rigid, firm, and clunky by comparison. The GT 2000 series could work as they're lighter, smoother, and softer than the Kayano. Saucony's Guides run smooth and light but feel firm and unresponsive. The Tempus is their stability supershoe It's lightweight with a firm, energetic ride and efficient rocker that makes it ideal for performance running. If you want a stability shoe that can double as a racing shoe, this is it. Brooks' Adrenalines are extremely firm, while the Glycerin GTS offers a solid middle ground with superior comfort, cushioning, and smoothness. For plush stability similar to what you're enjoying, stick with New Balance's Fresh Foam platform or consider the Glycerin GTS for a different but comfortable experience.

I have a history of posterior tib tendonitis and rotate many of the stability models mentioned in the comments. If you didn't get along well with Kayano 31, you probably won't like the 32s. I have both pairs and they are generous in the toe box and midfoot. Asics GT 2000 14 and Saucony Tempus 2 (which is being discontinued) are lighter performance models. Both shoes are narrower than Kayano 31. Asics incorporates a forefoot trampoline pod and Flytefoam Blast Max, while Saucony packs some of their Pebax foam and a rocker bottom into the midsole. Their rides are noticeably lighter and more energetic than Kayano. I hit a couple of PRs running in Tempus. It's the most efficient stability shoe I've run in. I also have a pair of Saucony Hurricane 25. It's a great daily max cushion trainer. Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 is similar. I stopped running in Adrenalines because they're stiff clunkers. I've run in New Balance 860 v14 and Vongo v6. Both fit narrow. A stability plane runs through the midsole and works with the geometry to achieve stability. The ride is soft and smooth. Despite a subtle bounce, they feel heavy and bulky. IMO the Goldilocks performance shoe is Saucony Tempus 2, the daily trainer is Saucony Hurricane 25.

I've run in Kayanos since the earliest versions. I've also run in Clifton, Bondi, 880, 860, and Ghost. Since you're looking for a durable shoe, you can rule out Hoka and NB. I love NB personally, but durability wise you can't beat Brooks.