Shark

PowerDetect 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with NeverTouch Base

Shark PowerDetect 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop with NeverTouch Base

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

Overall

#328 in

Robot Vacuums

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score60% positive
3
1
1

Top Pros

Top Cons

Last updated: May 27, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit Iconk9rap
9 months ago

we bought a shark self emptying (rv140) a few years ago from lowe’s and it’s been one of the best purchases we’ve made for our house. we have a german shepherd and she sheds all the time. this robot vac has kept up with the dog hair and kept our floors clean for 3 1/2 years now with no issues. we run it daily only on our hardwood floors downstairs. highly recommend.

Reddit IconDOOSH66666
9 months ago

My home is a mix of hard floors and rugs. Last week, on a whim, I got the Shark PowerDetect 2in1 (vac and mop) from Amazon for £477. I was impressed with the cleaning power of it but had to send it back because I was unable to get it to clean under my sofa or up to the kickboards in my kitchen. I would have kept it if it wasn’t for that. Today I got a Dreame X40 Ultra Complete for £699 as I did my research this time and have found it to be a lot better suited to me and totally covered what was missing from the Shark.

Reddit IconMastodonTemporary672
8 months ago

https://preview.redd.it/be1hgr3gjkqf1.jpeg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3aa1007c2bbf1ed8e64c6018b6da805f7357394b This has been amazing. Never gets lost or stuck. Vacuums and mops. Changes its own water. Dries its pad. And even lifts up the mop pad as it goes across rugs and carpets. 10 out of 10 highly recommend. Shark Power Detect 2 in 1

Reddit IconDalePigtail_
Reddit Iconfrickhelm
4 months ago

The blower idea is already done by shark and it is a pretty bad for dust. It blows it around. Shark® PowerDetect™ Robot Vacuum - EdgeDetect testing - pretty much a mess?! https://youtu.be/T9eTIXeagF4 At the end I also wipe the upper part of the shiny furniture strip that was completely dustfree before the test run.

Reddit Iconsysadmin420
5 months ago

My shark power detect no touch does a fairly good job, other than messing up the rugs (rug dependent) it does a great job. Mopping too. But I always vacuum and mop twice because my dogs crowd while playing around it

Reddit IconJellySignificant8964
3 months ago

I’ve had two of these for 5 years. https://a.co/d/08WVyNZY Still going strong. I’ve had at least 10 different robots over the years, these are the only ones to ever last longer than 2 years for me. I upgraded to the “shark never touch” that mopped and vacuumed, total junk it lives in the garage already.

Reddit IconJustHereForCatss
27 days ago

Respectfully I disagree. Neither Vacuum Wars or JustADad are even remotely unbiased. JustADad shows huge bias toward companies he likes, like Dreame or Mova, and pretty clear disdain toward ones he doesn’t, like Narwal. Go watch his Narwal Flow 2 first look. I actually wrote a whole post on here breaking down all the hypercritical stuff he nitpicked, and it really felt like it came down to him just not liking the brand. I like him more than Vacuum Wars overall, but it would be dishonest to call him unbiased. Vacuum Wars is a different issue. It’s less overt, but it shows up in how they rank and present things. The Shark NeverTouch UV being ranked 13 out of their top 20 out of hundreds of robots, is a perfect example. Pretty much every other reviewer that actually used it called it junk with an unusable app, yet it still lands right in the middle of their rankings. That kind of disconnect is hard to ignore. Same thing with the Dyson Spot and Scrub AI. That’s basically a reworked Roomba 705 with a massive markup and somehow an even worse app. A ton of reviewers said it was a joke and borderline unusable, yet Vacuum Wars put out “this is the first Dyson robot vacuum we can recommend.” That’s a $1,300 product. People are going to buy that based on a recommendation like that, and there’s no real way for the audience to verify how they got there. That’s my bigger issue with them. The ratings aren’t transparent, the weighting isn’t clear, and you never actually see all of the testing in one place. It makes true apples to apples comparisons basically impossible. On top of that, the scale of what they claim, the size of their staff versus the view counts they pull, it just feels off. They say they don’t take money and aren’t paid for reviews, and sure, maybe that’s true, but there’s no way to independently validate any of it. The whole thing just feels weird, especially with how inconsistent some of the outcomes are. None of this is even touching all the AI controversies they continue to find themselves in. At least JustADad runs the same tests over and over on every robot and shows them start to finish. Even if I don’t agree with a lot of his takes, I can actually watch the performance and make my own call. That alone makes his content more useful on a practical level.

27 days ago

I get what you’re saying, and I agree with the broader point that nobody is truly unbiased. That’s just reality. Where I think this has gotten a little out of hand is treating “they don’t take review units” like it’s some kind of silver bullet that automatically makes them more trustworthy than everyone else. I understand why that feels more independent, but it’s pretty standard across a lot of industries for reviewers to accept units and still do really high quality, critical work. Look at channels like Gamers Nexus, MrMobile, Linus Tech Tips, Hardware Unboxed, or Hippyotech. They all accept review units, and they still put out strong, honest reviews that will absolutely call companies out when something isn’t good. So for me, accepting a review unit doesn’t really invalidate anything by itself. I think what matters more is consistency and transparency in how conclusions are reached. With Just A Dad, I’m not saying he’s paid or doing anything shady. But even something like repeated bad experiences with a brand can create bias, even if it’s understandable. That’s just human. It doesn’t make his content useless, it just means it’s not completely neutral. With Vacuum Wars, my issue is less about bias and more about how the results are presented. When you’re putting out definitive rankings and scores, but you can’t clearly see how everything is weighted or directly compare tests across products, it’s hard to call that fully transparent. Especially when some of the placements don’t line up with what a lot of other reviewers are seeing. So I’m not trying to say either of them are worthless or that you can’t get value from their content. I just don’t think “they don’t take review units” is enough to put them above everyone else, and I don’t think it automatically makes them the most transparent either.

Rankings by Use Case

Top recommendations from others in the same boat

Other Reddit Recommendations: