Video Doorbell 3

Yes - but all of the battery doorbells should see more than your doorbell 2 - the battery plus and battery pro look better than the battery doorbell 3rd gen.

It's unfair to compare, but before Reolink, I had the Ring Doorbell Plus 3 Wifi right beside a dedicated AP. I spent dozens of hours over four years bikeshedding configurations to make it work, at best, less than reliably. That taught me a hard lesson: Wifi + cloud-based is hell for reliability. Now I'm aiming for wired + local wherever possible in my setup, and if not, at least local. Devices that required internet connection to work are banned here. Not because my connection is unreliable (it's not), but because I don't want to depend on these companies' servers.

We get 3 months before we have to charge our ring doorbell

It's the 3rd gen

My ring battery lasts 3 months without charge. You can also buy the solar panel which you can mount above the ring if you don't have an existing doorbell wire to keep it charged and then you don't need to unscrew it to charge. You can also adjust the "fence" on your ring so it doesn't pick up road traffic if that is an issue. Mine did initially get set off by the bin truck but I adjusted it and now there is no issues.

So many thoughts on this, and a few folks here have hit some great points already. Here is my 2 cents. For video doorbells, I'd skip both Blink and Wyze and go with the Ring Video Doorbell (battery version) since it's more reliable for security purposes and has better motion detection zones. The free trial is 30 days, then it's about $4/month CAD for basic recording. Since she's ground level, I'd also throw in a door security bar or wedge alarm for inside - they're like $20-30 and give actual physical resistance plus a loud shriek if someone tries to force entry. A motion-activated light for that ground level entrance would be huge too, as most break-ins are crimes of opportunity and good lighting is a serious deterrent. - Hope this helps.