Arc'teryx - Vertex Alpine

I personally use the arcteryx vertex. The grip is great for scrambling and they're comfortable like trail runners

I have these. The calf ‘sock’ seems to trap loose gravel more than an open shoe. Also these shoes are death on any kind of snow/ice - super slippy - Zero traction. Also, they don’t breath at all and I have there goretex version. I’ve never had issues with sweaty feet except with these shoes. Overall hugely expensive and totally underwhelmed. I like the fit/comfort but that’s about it. My Scarpa Mojitos were great approach shoes but they are hard to find and the design is a bit dated/heavy

Tried on the new ones, they are definitely narrower compared the beloved previous version. I'm not a wide foot per se, but definitely not narrow, and I think they'd still work for me. Considering getting them in the spring. Still the best shoe from my experience that'll hike, climb, even boot ski, comfortably all day. I've used the Arc vertex shoes, but maybe I just didn't have the same climbing confidence in them vs the tx4. Still use the vertex if the rock part of my day isn't as demanding. The new tx4's are worth a try on if you can find them locally, or get your usual and +1 size online to try on and return.

This is my first time getting arcteryx shoes, I’ve never had my feet be in such pristine shape after an ultra !

My other ultras I had to change shoes half way through because I was getting horrible blisters and even in the shoes I changed into by the end my nails were black and I was full of blisters. A lot is from my toes hitting the front of my toes on down hill on high elevation races. Unfortunately due to my foot shape it’s harder for me as I have very narrow feet but a few very long toes lol so it’s hard to find a shoe where im not sliding around in but where my toes also arent slamming into the front. I had zero blisters this time and it was a very very wet race where my feet were soaked the entire time. I also have had very bad Achilles tendonitis for years and it would be flared after long runs and these have a great heel drop and cushion that I find my persistent injuries don’t flare up. You’re very lucky you don’t have shoe or foot issues because I think that’s not very common!

I was between these and norda when I tried them in the store but norda just felt not right on my feet sadly

Really roomy but not in a way where they feel big, historically I’ve gotten extra narrow shoes so I usually avoid a wide toe box but these are perfect there’s absolutely no hitting the front or sides with my toes yet they feel secure

I have persistent tendonitis issue and find the foam super helpful for me but it does add to some instability on technical trails. But thank you!!

This! I couldn’t believe how unscathed my feet were. The ultra I did in Canmore over the weekend got a huge unexpected dump of snow and it unexpectedly became a very snowy, muddy, wet race where my feet were technically soaked the entire time but my feet weren’t cold and I had not a single blister. Even my hands had blisters from my poles but none on my feet. Last time I did that race in my Solomon’s in non-snow dry ground my feet were destroyed

Interesting! I have very long narrow feet and had to size down for these . I have been using them on technical trails with high elevation and been okay, really have had issues with any other shoe I’ve tried.

Arcteryx trail shoes are pretty narrow and have wicked good grip. Vibram Soles.

For day to day running a shoe wearing out faster isn’t a big deal. When I’m on backpacking trips for weeks at a time, a shoe failing can cause big issues. I haven’t managed to justify the price of Nordas for casual running yet, but I love them for thru hikes where I don’t have to worry about the hundreds of kilometres between me and the next shoe store. Plus compared to some shoes my Nordas have lasted more than twice as long. Their uppers seem to be indestructible, so at 1000km when I retired them they were in better shape than my Arc’teryx shoes at 300km, On Clouds at 100km and Hokas at 10km (aka when they all got their first holes). The people I know who love Nordas are those who tend to shred shoes - if you’re not destroying your uppers long before you wear out the soles there’s not much point to them. 

The thing is, for a lot of us getting shoes to that 700mi is impressive, let alone the 300-400mi after that where the shoe works but is less awesome. My Hokas got a hole in the upper on day one (so within 5km). My On Clouds got multiple holes in the uppers week one (so within 100km). My Arc’teryx got holes in the uppers within 150km. My cousin’s partner has similar issues with regularly destroying uppers in the first few hundred kilometres, long before the soles show signs of wear.  Is it “gimmicky” for us to finally have an upper that is durable enough that we can actually use the shoe until the rubber is worn down? Or is it a shoe that is well designed for our needs?

Dayhike - arcteryx trail runners or day hikers. Backpacking trips - scarpa boots (saved me from ankle rolls many times)

Not supportive at all in the shoes but they are nice to dayhike in with lighter loads.