Hoka - Tecton X 3

Have tried a few and here are my thoughts Saucony endorphin edges Very similar to endorphin pro 3s in ride. They are a fast shoe but let down badly by the grip (atrocious on wet rocks) and i struggled with the upper. Go half a size up to normal for these Brilliant for open firetrail Speedland SFD Is it carbon plated? Well they are in there but they offer the least assistance of any i have tried. Broad base and good grip with the absolute highlight being the lock down from the boas. Down side is they drain like shit without cutting the plug out and if you do that they let water in from any wet ground. Price is absurd for what you get Adidas terrex speed ultra This shoe is fast! Probably the quickest trail shoe i have used BUT They are incredibly unstable on anything even remotely uneven, hit a rock wrong and goodbye ankle. The instep rubbed my arch badly so only got 30k in them before passing them on l Hoka tecton x2 These have been an absolute workhorse for me. 400ks in my first pair and they have tons of life left in them. Maybe not the quickest ride but they are on par with the speedlands for stability but much lighter (cheaper too) Highlight for me is the way they drain Downside would be the tongue could be longer and thicker. Had issues with lace bite early on but got the fit dialed now. Great shoe for up to 50ks for me so far. Hoka tecton X3 Very bouncy ride, for me the most on par with road going super shoes. Took me a little to like and trust these shoes but now my go to race shoe. The grip is easily the best of all I have used including the X2s (can't beat vibram megagrip imo) They are wearing well and the ride settled down a touch to not throw me on bad landings( note it still will a bit) Down side, the lacing system not allowing a heel lock. Have to use thicker socks than normal (i prefer steigens) to mitigate the heel not locking 100% The upper is thicker than the X2s and doesn't drain quite as well but on par with most others

I use mafate speed 4s for most my runs but with use tecton x2s or tecton x3s for races depending on terrain.

The front landing area is felt was already large. Noticed the issue on a few slightly rocky decents where I landed slightly awkward and yes would just roll straight out. Was enough for me to decide not for me. Stupidly quick shoe when it smoothed out though. Love my tecton X3s but the ultras were quicker on the flats and rolling stuff.

For me the lockdown is much better. The tecton x 3’s weak spot is there lacing and feeling harsh due to the carbon plate on technical terrain. I’ve never been a fan of On until this shoe. The lacing is solid and the nylon plate is just forgiving enough to be tolerable. There is a reason many people are still using the tecton x 2.5

I think a lot would depend on the terrain. I've used the S/Lab Genesis and mostly liked it, but at the end of my last 100k, over very rocky terrain, my feet got really beaten up, and I think I would have preferred something plated like the Hoka Tecton X3, which I love (and have used as my one travel shoe for roads and trails). If that's not a concern, what about either the Norda 001 or 005?

1- Hoka Tecton X3 Amorti légendaire, sensation de rebond sur le plat, stable, accroche tres bonne, gaitre trop pratique dans les terrains pleins de graviers. 2-Salomon S/lab Genesis: la chaussure de trail la plus polyvalente, ça fait 3 ans qu'elle est sortie et au départ de tous les trails de 40k + la moitié des coureurs la porte, légère, accroche, tient bien dans le temps, très comfortable. 3-Salomon Ultra glide 3: des chaussons avec des crampons.

Hoka Tecton x3 Also bought Nnormal Kjerag as a rotation but it wasn’t working for my feet. Still looking for another shoe but the Kjerag has become a daily walking around shoe doing whatever. I actually find it’s getting more comfortable so I might give it another try (but maybe it’s wearing thicker non-running socks lol).

I’m a fairly competent climber but last summer I did some class 3 with the Hoka Tecton X3. It’s definitely not made for that but I wasn’t ever worried about having the wrong shoe either.

When I "technical trail" I winder what people mean because where I am at we have some black diamond shit. Wet, mossy rocks, mud, roots, more rocks and scree... we have everything except dry trails for 300+ days a year to put it into perspective. With that said I run in the following, ranked from most used to least... 1. Speedland GS GAR with some spikes added (3 on toe area and two all the way at the back) for a liiiitle extra grip on wet roots or rocks. I love these shoes for the wet, long run days. I leave the carbon plate out of these. 2. Speedland GL PDX: tempo/threshhold/ 5k, 10k even 20k but no more than that. Deeper lugs also helps when it gets really sloppy and also same spike arrangement added and I like the carbon plate in these. 3. VJ Ultra 3: Not the super deep lugs like the Inov8 shoes but amazing rubber and a really good wide toebox fit... at least by my standards. Hoka Tecton/x 3: On the dry days where the trails have had a couple days prior to really get things dry. I really love these shoes but they just don't have the traction for trails as technical as these. Hoka Zinal 2: For the short up's / hill races, hill sprints, etc. added a Sper Feet sole to these to add a little stiffness and protection. That's my quiver and my recommendations :) at least for trails...

Buy the Tecton X3. Run a lot of technical trails. Do some downhill-specific leg strength training and your ankle issues are going to be a thing of the past.

Try a pair of Tecton X3's if you are a Speedgoat-fan. Carbon-plated supershoes made for 100 milers.

I love the Tecton X3s and like others said if it’s working for you then maybe don’t mess with it. That said, $275/pair adds up quickly when you’re doing a lot of miles. For gravel / fire roads I usually run in Nike Ultraflys which have a plate and more or less the same foam, but go on sale for $160. I also do a lot of miles in whatever Tecton X2s I can still find for sale and actually feel more comfortable in them on single track.

My absolute favorite shoes for long haulers is Tecton x3 and I feel they are well worth their price tag. Only they don’t cut it on more technical terrain. That said shoes like Prodigio Pro are quite close.

I used to rock Altra shoes. But when I increased mileage uphill I got problems. Running on road gave no problems. Today I prefer 4-6mm drop over zero drop. Presently my favorite trail shoes are Tecton x3 and Prodigio Pro. I am keen to try out Norda 005 and VJ Ultra 3.

I have the same experience with Saucony Edge. Great shoe but I also get blisters on my heels. I have therefore migrated to Hoka Tecton x3 for non technical trails and La Sportiva Prodigio Pro for more technical trails.

I have done the same thing and have tried out very many shoes. One of my favorites have been Inov8 TrailFly 300, but in wet conditions it lack grip on hard surfaces. I also like Saucony Endorphin Rift for its midsole but I get blisters on the side of my heels. At the moment the Tecton x3 is my favorite for long runs but the upper lacks support so it is not that good on technical terrain. Brooks Cascadia is such a joy to run but I would not take it past 30k. On Monday the mailman will deliver a couple of new candidates namely The North Face Enduris 4 and the Vectiv Pro 3. Maybe one of them is the holy grail or maybe such a shoe doesn’t exist.

I do not have any experience with the Norda. The Tecton x3 is great shoe if things aren’t to technical. The Prodigio Pro is also great and it handles technical stuff much better

Sure, but there is more to it. The Tecton x3 gives me problems with low support from the upper and the high stack. But a shoe like Prodigio Pro seems much more stable.

I like the Hoka Tecton x3 for running in sand though it has been on beaches not deserts.

La Sportiva Akasha II is fairly wide and great for technical terrain. Brooks Cascadia is wide and has a great outsole. Hoka Tecton x3 is wide has a great outsole but the upper does not give a super hold down. Still a great shoe.

Brooks Cascadia if you don’t run very far Hoka Tecton x3 if the terrain is not too technical (the upper is kind of loose - good for comfort bad for support). Saucony Endorphin Rift is kind of the same as the Tecton x3 though I prefer the Tecton x3. And then I hope the coming North Face Vectiv Pro 3 will be the holy grail…

I like Tecton x3 and Saucony Endorphin Rift though both could use more support in the upper. La Sportive Prodigio Pro are in the mail so I hope they will be perfect

I have done most of my trail running in Tecton x3. As goes for vests I have been testing Eclipse 12 from Instinct Trail as well as the All Weather version of Adv Skin. Both vests will be included in my rotation.

My favorite shoes in 2024 for the trails have been Saucony Endorphin Rift and Hoka Tecton x3. Both accommodate rather wide feet.

For what you describe I would go with the Tecton x3. I have a race coming up where there are some technical parts where I don’t see the Tecton x3 as optimal. But most of the cause is quite runnable and therefore I will use the Tecton x3 and be careful on the technical parts

I bought the Mafate Speed 4 in the fall and found them to have really good grip on complex terrain. Ran a 30km race in them quite comfortably with lots of steep technical terrain. I also have a pair of the Tecton X3, which someone else mentioned, and used them for a relatively less technical 80km. I would not use them on the types of trails you described. They are killer fast for gentler stuff but not great when every step involves roots and rocks.

Nnormal Kjerag 2 (24/18mm) and VJ Lightspeed (29/23mm) are my favorite shoes for technical trails (up to 21 km). For 42 km runs, I have used VJ Maxx2 (31/25mm) and Hoka Tecton X3 (40/35mm) for some extra cushion. The new Kjerag 2 is really good! I would probably have the Tomir as well in my rotation, if not for the 8mm drop ... (There is always VJ Ultra 3 (38/30mm), Mafate 5 (44/36mm), Mafate X (49/41mm), Rocket X Trail (50/44mm) for even more stack ... but good luck to your ankles if you wear those on technical trails ...)

I’ve been training with the Tectonx3 as well and enjoy them. Thinking about using them for my 25’ races unless I find something snappier. The logo’s started to peel off the sides for me and they have <100miles.

Thanks for the feedback. I have been looking to replace my ASU’s with something similar and was considering the Vectiv Sky 2’s. The ASU’s are my favorite race shoe to date but I rolled my ankle in them 4 times during my last 100 and it really pissed me off towards the end. I have the TectonX3 too but they feel much flatter and less snappy. 

I have the Saucony Endorphin Edge, the Nike Ultrafly, the Adidas Speed Ultra, S/Lab Genesis, S/Lab Pulsar, Hoka Tecton X1 et X3, etc. I have over 60 shoes, trail and road. Each of these super shoes is very different ... For 12km technical races, I've been using **Pulsar SG** for the past few years because it's the lightest + most nimble + deeper lugs. But it's not the most versatile imho, it's quite narrow and I would not run longer distances. I would say my top 3 so far : 1- Tecton X3 : first pick for training and for races over 25km, if it's not too technical 2- Endorphin Edge : first pick for less than 25km, if it's not too technical 3- Nike Ultrafly : first pick for soft midsole, training any distance I'm not sure what I would use for a technical 12km+ race. Maybe S/Lab Genesis but I've not tested enough. Regarding, Adidas Speed Ultra, it's a very narrow shoe, not a fan so far. Tecton X1 is fine for training. I tried Norda 001 but returned it, I was not really impressed for the price. I will probably try Norda 005.

ASICS Trabuco Max 3, Hoka Tecton X3, and Adidas Agravic speed ultra are three of my favorite trail shoes right now.

Just got the new Salomon Slab UltraGlide. It’s very nice. The foam feels nice and springy. I also really like the Hoka Tecton X3s.

I agree with your assessment of the VJ Ultra, except that I find it fairly stable, especially in comparison with other similar shoes like Adidas Agravic Speed Ultra and the ASICS Metafuji. The VJ Ultra is probably my second favorite trail shoe for long ultras. Hoka Tecton X3 is my favorite, but it’s close, and I would definitely go with the VJ Ultra for an important race or training run. The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro is a great shoe, too, but I would probably only go with them for 50k or below.

I loved these too! I still have a couple pairs in my rotation because I was able to find them on clearance at Nordstrom Rack, but I haven’t checked lately to see if they still have any. I have a pair of the 3s and they’re fine but I don’t like them as much as the 2s (or even the originals) and they’re even more expensive!

I ran this year in the Tecton X3 and finished in 27hrs (though I raced like an idiot, killed myself and had to march the last 50km). I would probably wear the x3s again. T hey were pants in the sloppy mud but honestly you're not slowed down that much and there's a much higher amount of runnable trail where they excel. While I'm not a fan of the gaiter generally, it works great on these trails and nothing got into my shoes..

If I ran again I would be between the Tectonx3 and LSPPro. The primary trade off being that the hoka is more deeply cushioned, but the lugs on the PPro are slightly grippier. With that in mind, if it's dry 100% just go with x3s. If it's wet that's a tougher choice. There were definitely moments were I wished to have bigger lugs, but on reflection it's only a small % of the race and there's very little downhill slop where having a shoe with big burly lugs would actually have a big impact on your moving speed.

Looks like the same treatment they gave to the Tecton X 3. I absolutely loved the first two versions of that shoe but the 3 was a mess. Wider, bigger, squishier stack, just stretchy everywhere. The thing literally tried to roll over on my foot on anything more technical than smooth hard pack. I don't know why they're moving away from anything that could be considered a fast but still comfortable, technical shoe.

Late to the party here. How would you compare the lockdown to the Tecton x 3? I found my foot moved more than I would like with the tecton on steeper descents.

If the Tecton X3 is still solid—no wobble, no odd soreness—you’re fine keeping it for your next 50 k. The 10 % weekly mileage increase rule says you can stretch a pair a bit longer if you’re training sensibly, so a month or so of lighter mileage won’t ruin it. That said, don’t let the colourway hype dictate a hefty extra €50. Look for the previous colourway still in stock; many retailers keep a season‑back inventory for a while, and that version often drops to a lower price once the new one comes out. If you want a fresh shoe but can’t splurge, consider a model that’s slightly more clinical—like the Hoka Clifton 9 or the Brooks Ghost 15—both excellent for long runs and usually cheaper. Alternatively, a certified pre‑owned pair or a local running club discount can shave a few euros. The key is to keep the shoes in good shape; if they still feel good, you’ll save money and stay on track.

I love my Tecton X3’s - great for dry conditions. But read some pretty poor reviews about what they’re like when they get wet. Have you experienced them in the rain / mud? May need to rethink my shoe choice.

X 3 feels sooooo good on my foot, but I’ve come to realize I’m nowhere near fast enough to justify shoes this expensive. They’re super fun though and had my feet feeling amazing from start to finish of this year’s Black Canyon 100k.

I’m 300 km deep on a pair of Tecton X3s. Wild how good this shoe feels at the end of a long run. I’ve worn them on super technical stuff and haven’t had any issues with stability. Planning on racing in them at the Black Canyon 100k next weekend!

I’ve had two pair and just usually cut the gaiter off, I live in the SE USA were it stays wet and humid, so I don’t like having another piece of wet fabric stuck to me all day.

I’m not sure what I’d use them for over the tecton. I find the tecton on the slightly wider side for me anyway and these look wider still? I’m just not sure I can justify the rocket x trail when the tecton can do their job and more?

Mafate 4 & Slab ultra glide for training Then hoka tecton x3, brooks catamount 3 & agil, puma nitro elite trail for racing, depending on distance and terrain.

I’d stick to the tectons! - there’s the rocket x trail if you aren’t running on anything technical but I love the sock liner on the tectons because it stops all the little irritating bits of dirt getting in. That said, the on cloud ultra pro is a great shoe, and one I find myself reaching for quite frequently.

I've run the Arc a couple of times and got the Black Buckle to show for it. The route varies from boulder hopping, light scrambling, sand dunes, deep bogs and muddy sections to some very runnable flowy hard pact trail and even stretches of road along coastal promenades. This route has it all. Both times I ran this in a 4mm vibram lugged shoe, Mafate Speed 4 and then Tecton X3. These were pretty poor in the muddy and boggy sections in miles 0-10 and 65-78 but then I'm not really sure if any shoe is great in these sections. I made the compromise of comfort and having a shoe I could run the other 60-70 miles of runnable trail. Mark Darbyshire has dominated this race in Hoka Torrents which is an all-rounder shoe whilst Lewis Ryan won in 2025 starting in a 6mm fell shoe for the Coverack section before switching shoes depending on the terrain. I did not have a support crew and with UTMB changing the checkpoints and restricting crew access it's not as easy to shoe change and negate these issues as some runners have tried in the past. For example, the first year I ran the Arc there was a runner changing into Alphaflys for the road section from Marazion to Mousehole! Ultimately I would go for whatever you are most comfortable in. There are going to be sections through the night where you will be moving at a much slower pace than you are expecting but opportunitys after St Ives to make a lot of time up if you are still moving relatively well.

20 is likely much, but compared to a SG5 (not your list of shoes) I’d say it’s a noticeable difference. I only had SG5 for a while. When I retired them I got the Tecton x3, and eventually the prodigio pro. Huge difference going from the sg5 to x3!! Maybe not 20 seconds but noticeable. I wouldn’t shut up about them for a while. But the x3 vs prodigio bro is much more comparable. I’m not a professional but my preference is the x3 for things that are more runnable and the prodigio pro for more technical climbing.

And here's the latest updated trail collection. Trail running takes up around 40% of my mileage so there's an appropriate number of trail shoes compared to the road shoes. Like with the road shoes, pretty happy and feeling set with these for now and through most of 2026. The only trail shoes coming next year, so far, that I have some mild interest in is the Brooks Cascadia Elite, but it could be redundant when compared to shoes like the Tecton X 3 and Cloudultra Pro. The trail shoes that are getting the most mileage lately are the Cloudultra Pro, Prodigio Pro, MTC H1 & T1, and Enduris 4. I have over 200 miles each on two pairs of Tecton X 3, so backing off those for a while. Ditto for the Speed Ultra and Vectiv Pro 2, which I also have two pairs of each and with around 150 miles on each pair. Really enjoying the MTC H1 for the road-to-trail excursions (13\~15 miles) which I like to go on every Sunday. The Agravic Speed and Puma DNE Trail are two other shoes I use for road-to-trail, but the H1 just feel and ride better for the road and flatter trail terrains. Can't say I really 'need' anything more now but I'm sure I'll always be checking on new stuff coming out. https://preview.redd.it/k6edk126940g1.jpeg?width=503&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1edfeb64134c7dfde6873e6f375d6cd30027362f

Up to 9 models of trail shoe and still looking... La sportiva bushido (500+ mi): great shoe but not enough of a rocker and limited cushion for longer days. Salomon ultra glide (350 mi): great shoe but limited durability of midsole and not stable enough on varied terrain. Hoka speedgoat 5: loved this shoe but can only seem to get 300 mi out of the midsole before I notice significant decline (still brought 5 pairs of these to 300+) Hoka Mafate speed 4 (320+165mi): loved this shoe but a set or two of the eyelits are not reinforced and will eventually rip, and the toebox is too narrow for me and gives blisters on the outside of my big toes. Saucony peregrin 3 (150 mi): like this shoe but long days or steep ascents are too much and the heel counter gives blisters (disclaimer: I have bony heels). I wear this for shorter runs with some tech but not much steep uphill. Saucony xodus 1 (250 mi): like this shoe but doesn’t perform well on technical terrain in terms of stability and outsole-lugs sheered off on first technical downhill. I wear this for non technical trails. Altra lone peak 7 (300+ idk): like this shoe but just for non technical trails, Toe box is too wide to get a full lockdown. I use this shoe for hikes and walks on non technical terrain and it is the shoe i wear more than any other bc it is my daily shoe at work, where i am on my feet a few hours every day. Nnormal tormir 2 (200 mi): like this shoe but the lockdown doesn’t prevent my toes from cramming into the front of the toebox on steep descents. I wear this for technical trails without steep descents. Hoka tecton x2 (12 mi): I have only worn this shoe twice for shorter (6 mi) runs, but it doesn’t seem to have the level of midsole comfort/cushion that would get me past 20 miles. I wear this for workout/faster runs on trails. Hoka tecton x3: bought these for a race because of the upgrades to the midsole and then got injured and couldn’t do the race. Feel amazing on my feet and am excited to try these out when I have an opportunity. My trail shoe rotation is almost complete. But I am still searching for the unicorn: a trail shoe that has a grippy and durable outsole, a lockdown that is a good for technical trails and steep descents, and a midsole that is sufficiently stable, cushioned, and resilient. I like the outsole of the tormir, the midsole feel and durability of the tormir and xodus. And I like the lockdown of the bushido and speedgoat. If only the tormirs had a better lockdown…if only the speedgoat midsole didn’t degrade at 300 miles. Should I try the Nnormal Kjerag? Is there a frankenshoe out there for me? Redditors what say you TLDR: is there such a thing as a trail shoe that has a durable and grippy outsole, durable,stable, and cushioned midsole, and a lockdown for technical trails and steep descents?

Zegamas also get a lot heavier if wet, so if there is chance of that, another reason to look elsewhere. If you want spend some cash, the Tecton X 3 would be a great fit in this situation! Others similarly priced shoes to consider. North Face Enduris, only a bit lighter than the Zegama but more cushioned and doesn't feel as heavy. Breaths better. Topo Vista - also only a bit lighter than the Zegama and about equal cushion. I'm excited about it nonetheless. Finally, I replace a lot of my lower stacked shoes insoles with beaded tpu insoles which adds a bit of cushion and resiliency. Cheap way to make a shoe you like more cushioned, but you do have to be aware of volume of the shoe to make sure it doesn't cause issues.

Adidas will be too narrow for sure. Metafuji gets poor reviews, unstable. If Hoka works for you why not try the Tecton X3? It's supposed to be more relaxed in fit than the SG6.

Slab is way too narrow both are old. makes no sense to buy now. norda 005 is currently the best trail running shoe on the market, Hoka tecton x3 as a second.

Hello. I come from the same issue. I had major issues with Plantar Fasciitis after running in the Speedcross and S/Lab Speed for many years. My first shoe was the Hoka Speedgoat Evo. That was an epic shoe, but sold out everywhere so quickly I only ever ran in one pair. Since then I’ve tried many similar shoes, looking for great grip, soft and bouncy ride, but good stability as I over-pronate, plus I recently developed osteoarthritisin my big toes. So, I really rate the following: - Hoka Mafate Speed 4. Good all rounder - Salomon S/lab genesis. A little narrow and unstable but speedy and shed mud quickly - La Sportiva Prodigeo Pro - great foam and good grip, lightweight. - Saucony Xodus Ultra - 1 and 3 are pretty good, ignore the 2. - Hoka Tecton X 3 - my go-to race shoe for hard packed trails and gravel I like the Speedgoat, Catamount, Fuji Lite, Ultra Glide too but they all have compromises that the shoes above don’t have in the same way.

Hoka Mafate 5 is comfy and fun. Mafate Speed 4 is still good but a little narrower and not quite so bouncy. I used to run in Speedgoats a lot but think the 5 & 6 are missing some comfort and the foam isn’t returning the energy of newer shoes. Salomon Genesis or Ultra Glide are both good if you can accommodate a narrower fit. I prefer the protection of the Genesis over the Ultra Glide. Prodigio Pro is also fun and bouncy, but much lighter, less protection around the ankle and so a bit more stripped back. Everyone I know loves them though. Hoka Tecton X 3 is a similar proposition to the Prodigio but both are spendy. Hoka is slightly more stable and bouncy but there is very little in it. If you want the best outsole rubber money can buy, look at the VJ Ultra 3. Seriously, the lugs and rubber is like glue. Finally, the Saucony Xodus Ultra is a good shoe for distances like this. It’s also comfy and protective. Just avoid the 2 or 3 and go for the latest version 4.

Hoka Tecton X 3, and on technical trails La Sportiva Prodigio Pro

I have a Tecton X 3 from Hoka with a carbon plate, and in really technical terrain the plate is more of a problem.............I'm taking the Prodigio Pro to a very technical 100km ultra next week, instead of the Tecton X 3, the absence of a plate is more of a positive for me on the trail [https://believeintherun.com/shoe-reviews/la-sportiva-prodigio-pro-review/](https://believeintherun.com/shoe-reviews/la-sportiva-prodigio-pro-review/) [https://www.roadtrailrun.com/2025/04/la-sportiva-prodigio-pro-review-4.html](https://www.roadtrailrun.com/2025/04/la-sportiva-prodigio-pro-review-4.html)

La Sportiva Prodigio Pro - for faster training in technical terrain and for Ultra races in technical terrain Hoka Tecton X 3 - for long training in less technical terrain and for Ultra races in less technical terrain Nnormal Kjerag - for shorter fast runs in the mountains and for shorter fast races (up to 50 km) where there are not many rocks VJ Ulta - for training in technical terrain in wet conditions Hoka Speedgoat 5 - for catching up in less technical terrain VJ Xante Sarva - winter mountain spike boots

If you back yourself to navigate the mud relatively well I’ve found the Tecton is the best shoe I’ve worn for jumping between techy/rocky trail and running on the road. I’m also England based and have used it in the mud a lot (obvs) and while it’s not ~great~ it holds up well enough that the benefit you get on other surfaces is worth it.

Curious what do you consider less technical? I feel like my tectons handle it better than most shoes I’ve ran with the wings and vibram outsole.

It took me awhile to figure the shoes out, but once I got the proper insole and switch the laces, they have become my go to long distance shoe. I’ve used the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro’s for my short distance mountain races and the MTC T1 for my long distance runs and races. I just finished RRR 50 in them, and they handle every element I ran into great, my feet were me tired or sore, zero black blue toe nails. I also PR’d by an 1h30min, 6th overall female and 1st in the Masters. Previous shoe was the Hoka Tecton.

Yes, absolutely. For me it’s how likely I am to clip the outside of my heel. Lower height and zero-drop shoes make me run more on the forefoot, much safer on technical terrain. I run in Speedgoats on my easy weekday runs, Tecton X’s for the more technical weekend

I agree that Speedgoats are more ankle-rolly than my Tecton X’s or eg Altras. Chunkier heel = more chances to catch the outside edge of the heel. But your (my!) technique is the more important factor.

There isn’t a shoe that will work well in fells and road. You’ll have to sacrifice one or the other. There’s unfortunately no shoe that does it all. NVII Terra TT, VJ Xtrm have a bit nicer protection than Inov8s while being a proper hill shoe with superb grip. Various Scott Supertrac versions have more cushioning but they often have a very “dead” feeling on the road. Saucony Peregrine ST are very decent in mud but not so good on the rock and feel a bit burly. More than decent on the road as far as shoes go. Hoka Mafate/Tecton are great on more groomed trails but wouldn’t be my choice for most hill races in Scotland. Ditto on Saucony Xodus.

I personally really like Hokas for the trails. I've put 500+ miles into every pair of Hoka Speedgoats I have owned--really just the lugs start to wear down after a while. The Hoka Tectons are the more responsive racing shoe and I like them for flatter, faster trail races. What are your preferred road shoes? Some brands have a trail "sister shoe" that is basically a re-soled version of the road shoe with a rock plate

I think it's meant to be a straight competitor to the agravic speed ultra. The tecton is still biased towards comfort whereas this seems to be no compromise performance first. If it's more stable than the ASU it might win some people over. Lugs are a personal preference. I find they work on my ASU and the only scenarios they didn't are situations where any other shoe would have struggled aswel. (ankle deep mud soup or wet flat rock slab).

I’m on my 3rd season of switching to trail runners over hiking boots. Everyone may have a different experience but for me, my feet have never been happier (Hooka, Speedgoat 5).

I use black Hoka trail runners. They are miraculous, I can go all day without pain now.

I’ve switched almost entirely to trail runners including on a lot,of rugged terrain. I did find that when I was using Hokas that I had an increased tendency to roll my ankle after about ten miles. I like the padding, but have found lower drop shoes to be better for this. Altras are good, but I destroy them in about 300 miles. Trying Topos right now. Not as padded, but low drop with a wide toe box and they seem to be holding up better.

Trail runner will be fine. I was talking to a guy recently that said the AT requires real boots. But even by his argument, trail runners will be fine. The thing with trail runners is when you are tired, it is easier to roll your ankle. I have only found this to be a concern when I was using Hoka. Altras and Topos have less to zero drop and they don’t have this occur for me. Though Altras kind of suck for durability (expect 300 miles unless they fixed things). And Topos have less padding and are not as comfortable.