Mount to Coast T1

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

TL;DR: Lightweight, cushioned; but lacing and underfoot protection are issues.

Overall

#5 in

Trail Running Shoes

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score86% positive
69
5
6

Top Pros

Top Cons

Last updated: Aug 5, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit Icon1stWorldOutrage
5 months ago

💯try the MRC shoes. Super light and comfortable. Love the 2 zone lacing. Super stoked on both the MTC trail models I’ve gotten recently. H1 is definitely my favorite for mixed runs now, feels so good on road, gravel, even somewhat technical trails. The T1 is amazing for trails and snow. I’ve run mainly in Hoka speedgoats, and Altra Lone peaks for years now. I’d really like to try the Norda 005 and Speedland shoes but I’ll have to find a local shop that carries them.

Reddit IconAaron4_6
8 months ago

Right now, Mount to Coast T1 on trails and Adidas Evo SL for road.

Reddit Iconaproposgrandeur
8 months ago

I’m going to do my best to answer your question with the experience I have. The pros of military (also often seen as “tactical”) boots is they’re generally heavier duty and, like you said, a work/hiking hybrid. I don’t know when you were in but you may have noticed that a lot of brands for the Army and Air Force have moved towards a sneaker style boot. Some examples of brands doing this are danner, Nike, or under armour. Your Bellevilles and Bates are almost certainly more of a work style boot than a sneaker style boot. With that, the sneaker style boots are not nearly as durable as the heavier duty work style and can wear much faster. The main cons of military style boots are their bulk and weight. Some brands (see above) cut down on the weight by making them into a sneaker style, which is why so many in the force use those types. Another con is their height, 8-10in (for everyone other than SOF dudes) are just over the top for most hikers. MANY hikers and backpackers consider anything over 6in to be excessive as it doesn’t seem to provide actual ankle stability. However, Garmonts are massively popular for a reason so it really comes down to the individual. As someone that has hiked long distances is military boots, “tactical” boots, traditional (think leather based) boots, and trail runners; I prefer trail runners. You probably have seen that pattern already though. I like them for their lightweight, great grip, and relatively low price. I really have loved my Altras but also my Mount to Coast T1s. People kind of sleep on Mount to Coast in the hiking world but ultra runners love them so I figured they’d also be good for backpacking, and I’ve found that they are. Also, if you’re really hooked on something a bit more familiar and heavier duty I really recommend Crispi, those things are borderline indestructible and have a phenomenal fit. Hope this short essay helps!

Reddit IconATXguy13
10 months ago

I also have AP5 and can confirm this. This is literally my only complaint for this shoe. I wish the foam was a little more responsive and comfortable. Other than that it checks every single other box. I did pick up the new Mount 2 Coast T1 and it is now my new favorite (if you remove the trash lacing system and replace with traditional lacing). They do not have a rock plate but I run in an extremely cheese grater rock style area and haven't had an issue with any rocks impacting my feet. The foam is next level. So bouncy and comfortable. Grip is also very good and the upper is comfortable. I can tell they will work great for sessions with a lot of time on feet.

2 months ago

I have challenger 8 and it is a very soft shoe with a lot of stack and smaller lugs that might not be best for technical sections. It's more of a road to trail shoe. The H1 is also road to trail if I remember correctly with a lot of stack and smaller lugs. Out of the three you listed the speedgoat would likely be the best bet. It's comfortable and is better built for technical sections. You might also look at the Mount to Coast T1. I have it currently and it's a fantastic shoe. The foam is very comfortable and energetic. Plus the build is very durable as well. I think it will last a long time. I've run in speedgoat 5 and 6, and the ride of the T1 is similar to speedgoat 5.

2 months ago

I didn't really like the lacing system, so I took it off and put normal laces. In any case, the foam they use in T1 feels so great under foot. It's a really great trail shoe for sure.

Reddit IconClasslessMasses
11 months ago

I only got 180mi on my Peregrine 15s before the inside stitching around the heel split and the shoe lost all of it's structure. SG5s also didn't last long for me (the upper splits where it meets the midsole), but were great for the first 200mi. I'm onto Mount To Coast T1s and enjoying the combination of toe box width, traction, and stability (despite being a decent stack height of PEBA).. will report back on the longevity in a couple months.

Reddit IconCluelessWanderer15
12 months ago

Same thing for me when trying the Speedgoat 6, tongue was too short and the shoes felt a bit short around my ankles. Wearing thicker socks or applying some tape to where the tongue digs in relieved the issue, but the shoe was otherwise a touch too narrow for me. I have ~50 miles in the Mount to Coast T1 and it's the relatively light weight, medium-high stack, comfortable toe box having shoe I wanted out of Hoka and Topo.

11 months ago

I have >60 miles in them and the more I use them, the more I like them. I was wearing Hoka, Topo, and Saucony before. I like the toebox width, it fits my feet whereas Hoka is a smidge narrow. Also like how it's well cushioned, lightweight, and the midsole foam is just about right for me. Not unstable for me at all. Kind of reminds me of a better fitting Speedgoat Evo. I wanted a high stack-ish cushion shoe that was still light weight, fit my feet, and had good traction. No other shoe that I tried across Speedgoat 6, Timp, Topo, Saucony, etc. checked all my boxes as well as the T1. MTC did fantastic work bringing this to market. Haven't had issues with the speed laces loosening yet but I have normal shoe laces ready to go if they do.

10 months ago

I have ~80 miles in my T1, had many pairs of Lone Peaks 2.5-5. The T1 is one of my favorite shoes ever across Saucony XU2, Endorphin Edge, Endorphin Speed, Hoka Speedgoats, Topo Ultraventure 1 and 3s MTN Racers, Pursuit, and Timps that I've worn over the past 6 years. It just fits my feet, great traction, good cushioning, still light and can pick up the pace. The above shoes always presented some tradeoffs for me between fit (Speedgoats too narrow), traction (Saucony outsole not as sticky, also lost chunks, Timps just had too little outsole), and weight/energy/performance (seemed to struggle picking up the pace in Topos). T1 has it all for me so far, though durability remains to be seen at just 80 miles. Not sure on how the T1 fits vs Altra mens wide, you might order the mens T1. Mount to coast shoes are wider than most shoes but I would say closer to Topo than Altra. You could probably break out the tape measure, get some hard measures and photos with it with your current shoes and send to Mount to Coast to see if they fit.

10 months ago

Really enjoying my Mount to Coast T1s. Acceptably light, good cushion, great traction, generous fit for my feet. Have <100 miles so can't say much on durability. Only potential issue are the speed lace system. Some users reported that loosened on them, but hasn't happened for me. You can remove them and swap with regular laces. Also kind of lacks high eyelets around the ankle for heel lock lacing that other shoes have, but not a biggie for me. Previously ran in Speedgoats, Altra, Saucony, and Topo, if the T1s hold up then I will likely get another pair of them.

10 months ago

The toe box is wide and fits me well. It isn't Altra wide and not as rounded at the front end as Topo's UV3-4. If Altra is still a tight fit then I'm not sure the T1 will work.

10 months ago

I've had the Achilles/ankle chafing issue you mentioned with the Olympus with many shoes. I preapply some leukotape and bring some extra around my chapstick if needed. Use benzoin if needed, I used to do a full ankle leukotape wrap since the front, sides, and Achilles would chafe for me and it stick on for many days. Not the ideal one and done solution but works for me. Topo Pursuit worked well for me. Too early to tell on durability, but I'm really liking my Mount to Coast T1s since they have a good fit for me, pretty light for a medium to high cushion shoe (I would call it high cushion but (a) you used the olympus and (b) it hikes and runs faster like a medium shoe for me), protective underfoot, and Vibram Megagrip outsole.

9 months ago

I have >200 miles in my Nnormal Tomir 2s, spanning short steep runs to 20 mile runs with >5,000 feet of climbing at altitude. Previously ran in Saucony Xodus Ultra, Endorphin Edge, and Endorphin (g)rift. Traction and durability on the Tomir 2 are great. They are on the firm side, even with the mileage I put on them so far, and lean on fast feeling given my previous shoes. I would want more underfoot cushioning for anything beyond a marathon or 50K. To me, these are medium generalist leaning shoes, great for racking up miles and training. Fit was a touch too narrow at first, I have wide feet. Took around 50 miles for the insole to pack down and the upper to stretch and flex a bit. Fits comfortably snug now. For the long stuff I am using the Mount to Coast T1. Comfortable fit for my toes, good underfoot cushioning, yet light and fast enough that I don't feel like I'm working too hard when running uphill or picking up the pace. I have ~80 miles on them so far, really just a few long runs, they're great. Durability looks good but need to take them out to at least 200 to say more. If these still look good after 300 miles I would switch completely to them and not get another pair of the Tomir 2s.

10 months ago

I went from something like 10 pairs of shoes (3 road, 7 trail) to 4 pairs (1 road, 3 trail) which will eventually become 1 pair of each. Not counting spare pairs I keep in reserve when you find a winner and just KNOW the brand will mess it up in the next version. The whole time, I was looking for my ideal and separate road and trail shoes that fit well, were adequately durable, and could work for every combo of easy/hard and short/long runs. The shoes that didn't fit were just returned or donated. The others had something going for them and were tolerable, so I used them up. Loved the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3s, averaged ~900 miles/pair but got discontinued. But over several years I eventually burned through my pairs and it got supplanted by the 4s. The 4s were way too narrow so I donated them rather than rack up 500+ miles of having my feet crushed. Mount to Coast R1s feel great, durability is great so far, works well enough. The Saucony Endorphin Edge fits and runs great for me, but the outsole had just average traction and relatively low durability. I straight up lose outsole chunks in them. The Tomir 2.0 is a great durable shoe though a bit thin for me for long efforts. The Mount to Coast T1 checks all my boxes, durability looks good so far but need to get it to 300+ miles to get the full measure.

6 months ago

I have >200 miles in the T1, bought with my own money and have no relationship with MTC. I really like them. They are a high cushion (to me) shoe with good traction yet I can still pick up the pace in them. I don't have the Agility Peak 5 so can't compare toe box width, but I was wearing Altra and Topo for the fit and the T1 fits me well. My feet are wide but not super wide, as I do shorter runs in the Tomir 2.0 but wear the thinnest socks in them. The T1 isn't mind blowing but to me it is a well executed high stack shoe in the wider toebox niche. Topo's shoes in this range like the MTN Racer and UV are heavier by comparison and not as bouncy (harder to pick up the pace) while the Altra Timp had notably small outsole lugs/treads that tore off for me or wore out super fast on the hard desert rock I run on most of the time.

8 months ago

I have >500 miles in the Mount to Coast R1s and >100 miles in the T1s and recommend them. I wouldn't call the T1 cushioning firm but it is not soft to me either. Checks all my boxes for cushioned, grippy, fast-feeling, and good for all-day use.

5 months ago

I have >600 miles in my R1 road shoes and >200 miles in my T1 trail shoes. Both are in good to very good condition and show wear (fraying and holes) in the collar lining but that is cosmetic and hasn't translated to irritation around my achilles/ankles at all. Upper fabric on both are in great condition, very little if any wear/tear seen. Cushioning is great on both. Outsole wear on the T1 is moderate. I think they'll make it to 400 miles for sure, which is above the usual 250-300 miles I typically get, at which point the T1s will be semi retired for easier trails or hikes and road runs. Comfort is excellent for me. They fit my slightly wide feet very well.

9 months ago

Mount to Coast T1s. For me, good underfoot cushioning, excellent traction, decently light for what it is, and accommodating fit in the toes. To me, it's what a wide Speedgoat, quality controlled/durable Timp, and lighter faster feeling Ultraventure/MTN Racer/Pursuit should be. Or an Endorphin Edge with better and more durable outsole.

3 months ago

I have around 300 miles in my Tomir 2.0s, I would generally describe the cushioning as medium firm and I generally lean towards high stack and medium plus bounce cushioning like new Speedgoats, Saucony shoes, Mount to Coast T1, and some of the newer shoes made with bounce in mind. Don't know if you've tried, but some Leukotape on my achilles ahead of time entirely prevents achilles chafing and blistering for me. If the Speedgoat is on the table for you and you have wider feet, I recommend checking out the Mount to Coast T1. It's what I wanted the Speedgoat and Topo shoes to be. It has a high stack but for me, the cushioning is not grossly soft, can still feel objects underfoot, and don't have issues picking up the pace.

6 months ago

I have >200 miles in the Mount to Coast T1s, mainly hard packed very rocky stuff that chews up shoes faster than other trails, and would recommend them especially if you want more toe space.

5 months ago

Have you checked out the Mount to Coast T1? I liked the Speedgoat 3, Evo, and 4 in particular, but also liked Topos and Altras. Both had their tradeoffs for me, and the T1 just checks all the boxes for me.

about 2 months ago

2 pairs of trail shoes, 1 pair road shoes. Covers all my running across shorter/faster trail, long runs, hiking/backpacking, road running, workouts, etc. Strictly speaking, didn't need the second pair of trail shoes but wanted to try something new and I like the Mount to Coast T1s so when the other shoes wears out I'll probably get more T1s.

Top Trail Running Shoes on Reddit

1
Mount to Coast H1

Mount to Coast

H1

85% positive of 177 users

Versatile road-to-trail, but struggles on wet, technical downhills.

2
Altra Lone Peak Series

Altra

Lone Peak Series

70% positive of 484 users

Spacious toe box, but cushioning and durability are polarizing.

3
La Sportiva Prodigio Series

La Sportiva

Prodigio Series

74% positive of 219 users

Great technical grip, but unstable for some, with sizing issues.

4
Nike Pegasus Trail Series

Nike

Pegasus Trail Series

75% positive of 223 users

Versatile for non-technical trails, but poor on wet, technical.

5
Mount to Coast T1

Mount to Coast

T1

87% positive of 84 users

Lightweight, cushioned; but lacing and underfoot protection are issues.

Rankings by Use Case

Other Reddit Recommendations:

FAQs