LG - 38GN950-B

45” may just be the sweet spot. I use a 49” G9 and a 38GN950 which are both brilliant but in the middle could be a great compromise

I was running a 34GK950F for a few years before transitioning into my current 38GN950 + LG DualUp setup. I would love to see if a 5K2K GX9 is the holy grail to replace it. My wife also has an LG 32" Ultrafine w/ ErgoStand that I sometimes plug my laptop into. I never experienced OLED monitors before. I do around 60% coding/design and 40% gaming.

I have the 39" LG oled and the 38" lg IPS display that is 3840x1600. For games, the benefits of oled and a higher refresh rate far outweigh the smaller resolution of the 39. I love it and will never go back. Another advantage is that for fps games, 3440x1440 is much easier to drive to high refresh rates. My 3090 was hovering around 110 in CoD MW3, and is significantly better than that around 160+ I may still play Civilization on my 38", but for everything else, 39" is great!!

I use the LG 38 gaming specific equivalent 38gn95b. It is and has been an excellent monitor. I highly suggest this one. 5k2k takes a lot to drive while 3840x1600 takes less to drive than 4k. I use it mostly for work now, but I used to use it for gaming and it did that very well. I would not go super ultrawide for work. Once you go beyond 21:9, you are better off with two separate monitors for multiple reasons. You will see the difference in the refresh rate as well.

I have the WR85. The panel is nice and plenty of connectivity. KVM is a nice bonus. If you don't need KVM and the ports aren't a deciding factor just go for the GN950 IMO.

In that case the extra money isn't buying you anything of value. Get the GN.

I wonder why no one talks about the size in between. I have an LG 38GN950, a 38” 3840x1600 ultra wide and it’s pleasantly better than the 34” 3440x1440. It’s quite the sweet spot between the smallest and largest UW screens.

It’s the 38GN950. Pretty sweet, has an ambilight feature, 160Hz and 450 Nits. No KVM though, but Ali has good solutions for that.

Love my LG 38GN950 - but thinking about OLED sometimes, the display of my Lenovo Yoga is just too awesome…

Maybe off your radar, but I have enjoyed using the 38", 3840 x 1600, IPS, HDR600, LG 38GN950 for the past few years. (Alienware has their own version of the same panel.)

I’ve been using the LG 38GN950 for the last few years and it’s been great. Recently I attempted to switch to OLED and replaced it with the Asus PG32UCDM which was ultimately a failed experiment and was subsequently returned. While the blacks and colors of the OLED were great the HDR was lackluster and the constant black screens were a deal breaker. I’ve been waiting for a monitor in the 38”-45” range that offers similar or better pixel density than the PG32UCDM. I believe this size, pixel density and a refresh rate of greater than 160-175hz with an 1800-2300R curve to be the sweet spot for gaming/productivity. I’m somewhat skeptical of the 800R curve in the monitors of the last few years as they are immersion focused but may lose their productivity benefits but I have not used one first hand for an extended period of time. The bendable version seems as though it could tick all of the boxes while providing the flexibility to switch between more of less curve for gameplay immersion rather than productivity.

I have the same and I've been using it for both productivity and gaming for last 2 years. It's awesome and didn't break the bank!

I'm also currently on a 38" 2300R (AW3821DW) and was tossing up an OLED, but most were either an inferior spec 40" 21:9 or a smaller 34" 21:9. It seems like you're ok with the switch to an 800r?

I made the stupid mistake of selling my AW3423DWF a month ago to move to 4K 16:9 (MSI 322URX), not even 24h after receiving the MSI I regretted it and returned it. Luckily the AW3425DW came out at a very decent price (At least here in Europe) and paired with a 10% discount I grabbed it for 777€, so not a huge loss after all. I am simply not going back to 16:9, I love Ultrawide way too much. That said, I do miss my old LG 38GN950B's resolution (3840x1600), if they ever release an OLED with that size and resolution, I am jumping to it right away, I think it is the PERFECT size and resolution for overall productivity and gaming combined.

Currently using a LG 38GN950. Wouldn't want to drop in resolution just to change to an OLED monitor. I know 4K OLED exists but I prefer ultrawide. This would be the perfect upgrade for me if ever.

Could you elaborate on how exactly they work better than FreeSync (Nvidia certified as G-Sync compatible)? Aside from the obvious difference in the refresh rate range of course (FreeSync only kicks in at around 48Hz). I have a 38GN950-B, and there’s literally no difference in performance compared to my 165Hz G-Sync monitor. I’ve never noticed even the slightest difference between them, and I’ve used both monitors for years.

I was in the same situation, I do not have space for triples, I thought in a 49" but my issue is I also play flight simulators and I do not want to loose the vertical space you loose with a 49", that is not good for flight sims, so I found the 38" as an ideal middle ground, ultra wide, curved to give a little more immersion and good vertical space, I bought a LG38GN950 and I am delighted with it, I can confirm in fact is the perfect middle ground, it is a pity this size is not popular and there are only a few options.

same - my gn38 is perfect size. I can't go any bigger

I'm coding on LG 38GN950-B. I love it. OLED isn't suitable for productivity in my experience.

As someone who just had to go back to 2 16:9 monitors from an UW, going backs honestly not that hard. Takes about a week to get used to it again. I do miss the UW and if I didn't need 2 screens I probably would have stuck with it because my 38GN950 was fantastic. But neck problems and space constraints forced my hand. Unless you have a reason not to I'd go for an UW because they are fantastic

Currently I'm using the 57" G9 - while I do love it, and it's fantastic for working, I feel like 32:9 is too wide for gaming - it often feels like you're looking through a letter box. Whenever possible I've been setting a custom resolution so I can play in 21:9 5k2k, but that isn't always possible and is often a fiddly thing to get working. I had the Ultragear 38GN a few years back, and I think it was almost-perfect in terms of size. I'd be very excited to try out the 45" to see if bigger is better.

I had doubts, bought the 45GR95QE on his release and you get used to it but I would like to have a lesser curve to be honest. I have a 38GN950B (1800R) above the 45 and I want something like 1000-1400R.

I had a 38inch lg before, 3840*1600 on a 5080 OC. Now the 5k2k. In cyberpunk I noticed a 20 FPS drop, but still above 120 FPS in basically everything. I didn't run any before and after benchmarks. I wanted a bigger screen and resolution as well as oled. So any drop is acceptable to me. Also yes, I run dlss and FG as so far I have not noticed any artifacts myself. I guess it really depends on how picky you are and if you tend to "look for" those frame differences or artifacts.

I just upgraded from the 38" Ultragear to LG's 45" 5K2K OLED. Text looks fine to me but admittedly it's 90% for gaming so I might not have the most discerning eyes.

Not to me. Not sure if we have the same 38" but my Ultragear is 1000R I believe, so it's not a big leap. If I was coming from a flat display, might take some getting used to.

Just order the 38 inch. lol

Sorry for the confusion. Mine is custom made. It is from China. 38inch, Nano IPS with 144Hz Refresh rate.

If youre going ultrawide for the sake of actually having a large screen to work with, your best choice would be to go for a 38in because they scale better and have 3840x1600 resolution. And their color accuracy is usually top notch. There's no real good reason to use 34in UW outside of gaming when 38in exists and is a better resolution size for scaling. I have the MSI MEG 38inch, but previously had the LG38G nanoIPS. Same panels in both monitors, my LG just got killed by a brown out.

Tbh my guy, I have a 38 LG 144hz monitor I use for work (the newest one but I can’t remember the monitor number) and a AW3225QF for gaming. When I occasionally game on the 38, the difference between it and oled is pretty minor unless you are playing a very dark game. I’ve been playing a lot of Lost Epoch on it and quite frankly, it looks nicer to my eyes.

The same panel is used in the LG 38" widescreen monitors. I'm having one of the Lg with freesync instead of g-sync

I think the sweet spot is in the 45-50" range for a 5k2k monitor. I've been wanting something in that range for a very long time now. I have a 38" 3840x1600 LG monitor now, and as great as it is, I would love more size and resolution.

I had a similar 34" 21:9 LG monitor and I found it too small for my liking (the height/vertical FOV felt too narrow). I prefer larger screens). So I switched it for an LG 38" 21:9 instead, which felt way better.

I always considered 38" at 3840x1600 to be the sweet spot in terms of ppi and vertical screen real estate. The GX9 is an upgrade to both which makes it the top choice until the higher ppi 39" versions arrive later this year

I went from 2 22" displays to 1 49" Samsung CRG9. The 49" was great for work productivity but for gaming I found it to be too short (not tall enough). I sold the 49" and now have a centered 38" (3840x1600) "main" display and an off center 27" (2560x1440). For my uses, the 38" is excellent for both work productivity and gaming and I use the 27" on the side for comms (Email, Teams, Discord, etc.)

The 38 inch lgs fit the bill

Same, 38" LG for both work and gaming and love it - but considering 27" OLED maybe this year, because even 4080s struggles to get high enough fps on higher settings in new UE games.

THIS! I have a LG 3840x1600 38" - perfect! Just wish it was 144Hz. I refuse to go down to 1440P.

I have a 38” LG with a slight curve, maybe 1500R and I really like it. I keep thinking I want to do the LG 5k 45” but it has an extreme curve and I am a bit worried it’s too big for what I need. I mostly use my PC work type productivity but play games on it as well. If you think 45” is too big, look at a 38” or 40”. However, these sizes don’t seem that prevalent.

3840x 1600, 144hz, 1ms. 38” LG

In follow-up of my previous post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ultrawidemasterrace/s/3pdB5GfzyG Update: down from 4 to 2 - LG 38" and Dell 40" remain. Was able to order the LG 38", and it arrived this yesterday. First impression; • ⁠Size is nice, but would not say no to 40" either. Drawing programs, CAD/Vectorworks/Sketchup are very nice full screen! Far better overview than before. • ⁠21:9 is a good ratio! Not too high, not too wide. • ⁠Curve is small, but dont need more. I don't have the impression my straight lines are curved at all. • ⁠3840*1600 resolution at 110ppi is better than expected (come from an 188ppi laptop). I'm a bit further away than from the laptop so at first impression definitely pleased with the quality. Text sharpness is what it should be. • ⁠Brightness is running at 60%, which is more than bright enough for me. In HDR mode i had to put it at 100% to be comfortable. There is an auto brightness function but its rubbish at first glance. • ⁠when standing I have to put the monitor at highest height, I would not mind a few additional centimeters here... First conclusion (LG38" vs Dell40"): Since no additional brightness is needed, the LG already has a slightly higher refresh rate and response time, and KVM functionality is not the highest priority; the Dell's advantages remain a few additional inches, and the far superior resolution. So, if in a week or so I'm ok with the size and resolution of the LG I will stick with this one I guess... Also this was an open box deal for €850, which would make the Dell x2 in price without a discount. Do they often give discounts? No longer on my list is the LG40". Found a used one with 1y warranty remaining for €800. Since I currently have brightness at 60% the 240cd/m² would be ok, but I'm afraid of the 72Hz... Also at this 5120x2160 resolution I might be pushing the GPU too much? Although I'm planning to buy a RTX 4080 Super of RTX 5070 Ti...

I've been rocking a 38 LG and I absolutely love it. I originally had dual 1080p 32s, and then Upgraded to a 34, hated how small it was, returned it and got the 38. I rock a vertical 27 next to it, and this is my all time favorite setup I've ever had.

Hey LG! I’ve had the 38” LG IPS and now have the original 45” OLED! I’d say my sweet spot is probably the 45”. It has the perfect vertical resolution and the curve is super immersive. While I currently only use it for gaming I think it’d be cool to do a review of the 3440x1440 and the 5k2k side by side in productivity apps to help clear the muddy waters in the PPI conversation. Thanks!

Try to have a look at the screen sizes in a store before you buy. I had my mind set on a 49" but after having a look at it, it felt like it lacked screen height. I settled for a 38" LG 3840x1600 instead as it suited me better. If I were to buy a screen today I would have a look at the 5k2k screens and see if I like them.

I was in a same situation that I wanted to simplify my monitor setup. 80% work, 20% gaming. Was also considering the option of a 32" display. At the end I bought a 38" LG IPS display with 144Hz, Freesync, KVM switch, bunch of usb ports. So to speak the perfect allrounder. Ok, the producivity part is nice but damn, gaming is so much fun, pulling you into game, especially with FPS games. Want to also try Civ6 some time, is probably also nice to have a broad view. One of the best investments ever, every cent worth it.

Well, currently playing Doom Eternal that supports widescreens, no black bars and it's awesome on the 38" display. Besides that Half Life 2 and warhammer boltgun are the only fps games that I have :). And Borderlands 3, if you count that also as fps.

I recently bought the first one. Is one of the best purchases of my life, for real. It's the perfect allrounder. You can even game on that (has even freesync) without sacrificing any productivity related features.

Agree - noticeable improvement on my 38 3840 x 1600

Same I'm running a 38" LG as well, excellent monitor I've been desperately waiting for an OLED variant

I've got an LG 38" ultrawide and I really couldn't go back to anything lower, so that is my current sweet spot. I am terribly curious about the next generation of incoming OLEDs though, especially since my screen has a scratch on it that is impossible to ignore.

I guess you can put it to preference…. I don’t like 27” 4k.. text is too small and trying to get text to look good and not be too big to lose the 4k size…. It’s just not good. Basically, a 3440x1440 at 39”.. the text will be bigger. The actually benefit is just bigger size but the use screen is still the same as a 34” 3440x1440. If you want a bigger monitor and proper resolution, look at 38” 3940x1600 or the new 45 5k2k. When looking at monitor, you shouldn’t just look at size … you need to look at resolution to size. 4k - 32”+, anything smaller may give more ppi but the actual image size will be bad visually.. if you can’t see it well since it’s too small, what’s the point. 34” - 3440x1440, this seems to work really well. It’s not just me but many others who use it. Higher res may work for this size but… it may have the same issues as too high res for the size. We won’t know until it comes out and people try it. 38” - 3840x1600, this seems to be a proper size to res. It’s also a great work size due to the higher height resolution. The unfortunate part .. it’s not a standard size so they are expensive and most are older models. Nothing new for this size/resolution. 39” - these are mostly cheaper 3440x1440 due to bad resolution to size. There are more expensive versions as you can see but not worth it in my opinion. -other res may exist but the most likely one is 3440x1440 49 - 5120x1440, 2 1440p monitors basically. This is a popular 32:9 monitor size and from users… it seem to work well. This may get 5k2k versions and that might work really well thought the size maybe a little different. There are other sizes but those are the basic ultrawide sizes that I have seen. -57”, this is a nich size for ultrawide so didn’t add this. If you got this, you know you want it.

LG 38” that is IPS and 1600p. I absolutely love it. Slightly more vertical real estate than 34”, great for daily office use and solid for gaming as well with the 144Hz. I of course wish I could turn it into an OLED on command but I didn’t want to deal with poor text clarity and burn in concerns.

Grabbed the refreshed LG 38” and really love it. Not perfect and I of course wish I could switch it to OLED when gaming, but it’s the ideal productivity/gaming monitor for me.

I upgraded from a 34" to an LG 38" and I think 38" is pretty perfect. I'd have a hard time getting anything wider on my pretty large standing desk unless I ditched my speakers

I bought the 38" LG last year and I love it. I thought 360cd/m2 wouldn't be bright enough but I woke up my PC the other night and it was dark in my room, holy balls, I literally had to squint to use the damn thing. Very good for gaming. I think the 40" might be better for productivity but I got a steal on the 38" LG so I don't regret it. Since it's still under native 4K it's fairly easy to drive for gaming.

The LG 5K2K on my desk is such big step up from the LG 38” UW IPS. I’m spending way too much time on gaming since I upgraded. Love it!

I tried both the LG38 and Dell U40. The panel uniformity on the LG38 is hot garbage. I've exchanged it once: Here is a picture of a "good" one at 100%. Yes, exposure time exaggerates the IPS glow, but all four corners are bleeding and visible in 0% brightness: [https://preview.redd.it/another-ips-panel-bleed-post-v0-bx3habx7jxge1.jpg?width=4029&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6220f6cda81c169866e6b680f7d24ec7227ada1c](https://preview.redd.it/another-ips-panel-bleed-post-v0-bx3habx7jxge1.jpg?width=4029&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6220f6cda81c169866e6b680f7d24ec7227ada1c) The replacement was worse, with bleeding all over the bottom edge in addition to the four corners. Here is a picture of my current Dell U40 at 100% and overexposed. It's nowhere near as bad in reality and at 30% brightness the bleed is not visible. [https://preview.redd.it/dell-u4025qw-black-uniformity-v0-d7b3jlu2skie1.jpg?width=3705&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b5ae8c87109c9b46c221db57186414632b80352d](https://preview.redd.it/dell-u4025qw-black-uniformity-v0-d7b3jlu2skie1.jpg?width=3705&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b5ae8c87109c9b46c221db57186414632b80352d) Note how the blacks are black and not blue.

Using a 38 3840x1600 and works great. Imo it will be fine until series 7k.

I hope that’s true. I’m a fan of the 38”, but 39” seems good. Will keep holding out

Ultrawide, for sure. The standard-ish 3440\*1440 I found a bit small, so I went with a 38" 3840\*1600. I do think my next will be a 5Kx2K, though. Many games won't support it, but you can run 16x9 if they don't just fine.

GUI monitor can be whatever you want. However, generally, people recommend having your reference monitor in the center, so having a GUI monitor to left and to the right of it makes more logical sense. I run a 38" LG ultrawide and a Flanders DM250 to the right of it.

I have a 42" c4 OLED after having a 38" LG ultrawide and I'll never go back. I have a 4080 driving it. I know it's a personal preference but I like having the real estate back on the top and bottom.

Is it really worth over 2x the price of the LG38? Imo those 38 inch panels (LG and AW38) are the GOATs for a mixture of productivity and gaming. I use an AW38 and my use case is exactly the same as yours.

38in LG ultrawide it’s IPS 🔥 gentle curve

Lookup va black level smearing before you go with a VA panel. I'd recommend checking out a video of say the Dell 34 inch VA panel as that's basically what you will end up with. Specifically look up black level smearing on any VA panel you are browsing. If you go cheap it could be worse than that. If you can't stand the black level smearing an IPS should be midrange for the price. There are plenty of options at 144 Hz. If you can get one I'd say go for the LG 38 inch 1600 p monitor as that is my daily driver for 3 years. I actually own the Alienware one but it's the same panel just 144 Hz and I'm not sure how common Alienware is as a brand in Europe. Otherwise you can go with an OLED 34 inch but they are expensive. I'd guess easily $1000 Euros. Imo increase your budget a bit for your monitor of choice. It's gonna usually last you 5 years. So an extra $200 can go a long way for peace of mind.

I have a 9800x3D and just got a 9070xt and I play on a 3840x1600 38" ultra wide, it's dope

Having used a 38" 3840*1600 extensively for work I've been waiting for a long time for an OLED ultrawide to meet or beat that resolution. I'n my opinion anything less than 1600 vertical pixels is insufficient for productivity usage so I've been extremely excited to try 45" at 5k2k for some time!

Their great, I had an LG 38” Curved UltraWide QHD+ (3840 x 1600) for many years and I found that great as well. 1600 is the min vertical I'm okay with personally