Jet 60 Pet Cordless Stick Vacuum

Second the Samsung ones. We have the jet60 pet (don't think they stock that exact model anymore) and I can basically do my whole split level 4 bedroom house in one go and we have a long haired cat and a dog. We don't have the clean station but my friend does for hers and she loves it

I don't recommend Dyson dupes or copies. Cordless vacuums have a lot of drawbacks to be lightweight and get to a certain price. The battery can't be too big or heavy and since the battery is a very expensive component other parts are smaller or cheaper. So I only recommend name brand cordless vacuums that have replaceable batteries and replacement parts available. Sometimes I've seen an LG CordZero A9 and Samsung Jet 60 with basic models under $200. I wouldn't buy anything cheaper than those vacuums because the cheap cordless vacuums break in a year or less and then they're aren't repairable. If you are looking to stay around $100 I recommend looking at the corded Kenmore Intution. It's a small upright vacuum with hepa bags. It's light and since the motor sits near the wheels the handle weight is actually less than a cordless vacuum. Many of the Kenmore Intuitions range from $150-180. There's a cheaper Intuition BU3040 that removes the liftaway mode and usually goes on sale for around $120-130. There's a cheaper Vacmaster UB0302E $100-120 this is same vacuum as the Intuition BU3040 but with less tools and bags included. Another option is to look at the corded stick vacuums. Not the $30 Bissell Featherweights, but the Dyson dupes with a cord. They're even cheaper than the cordless Dyson dupes. Since they are corded they don't have run time limits or battery issues. If you get a corded stick vacuum buy replacement filters to have as backup because they don't stock replacement parts for long. The downside of a corded stick vacuum is it isn't as powerful or have the capacity of an upright and you don't get any cordless convenience. They usually don't stand up and still have a heavy handle weight.

The LG CordZero and Samsung Jet have filtration like this. The Dreame vacuums do on the cheaper side. Since you are in the U.K. you do have the Henry Quick Cordless and Henry Quick Corded. The bag/pods offer great filtration and avoid bagless mess.

I agree, the unfamiliar brands are cheap, break quickly, and have no parts support. Don't buy them. There are several vacuums right above $150 that are worth checking out. The HART 20-Volt High Capacity Cordless Stick Vacuum Kit $149 is a rebadged Hoover Onepwr Evolve, the Hart batteries are compatible with other Hart vacuums but not with Hoovers. Hoover Onepwr Emerge Essentials $178 and Samsung Jet 60 Flex $188 (both at walmart) and Hoover Onepwr Evolve Pet Elite and Hand Vac $199 (home depot). All the batteries will wear out in 2-3 years. If you just want a small lightweight vacuum the corded Kenmore Intuition BU4022 $149 will outclean any cordless vacuum.

Cordless vacuums are good for quick daily cleaning but they can't deep clean carpets and they can get heavy if you are trying to clean an entire house with a cordless vacuum. Dyson vacuums are ok but they are more expensive just for the name. Also the more expensive Dysons are not better. I'd avoid the Dyson V15 and Outsize, they are too heavy to use. The Dyson V8 and V12 Detect Slim are smaller and better balanced, bonus is they can cost less. If you don't have a corded vacuum, I recommend buying that one first or very soon because you'll really feel the difference on your carpets. Canadian prices are quite different from the U.S. prices. Miele and Sebo cost less but LG and Samsung cost more. The Dyson V8, LG CordZero, and Samsung Jet are my go-to recommendations for cordless vacuums. The Sebo Felix and Sebo K3 are my go-tos for corded recommendations. Thoughts?

Itse olen kokenut dysonit kömpelöiksi ja jotenkin leluiksi. Nyt käytössä samsung jet pet sarjan varsi-imuri ja on hyvä, pestävät säiliö ja suodatin ja lemmikkitalouteen suunnattu. Jos rahasta ei olisi kiinni niin satsaisin kyllä Mieleen.

Ik heb die ook maar weet niet of ik er tevreden van ben. Het is wat mij betreft een kutding met weinig zuigkracht en een kleine batterij, maar dat zijn ze misschien allemaal. Ik weet niet wat ik er van mag verwachten. Tegelijkertijd pak ik hem wel vaak tov onze gewone stofzuiger dus zo slecht is hij nou ook weer niet 🤷. In elk geval zou ik niet nog een keer die 300 of hoe veel was het uitgeven en gewoon een 2e gewone stofzuiger voor de bovenverdieping kopen.

They cost around 699 euros, with 280 watts of power. You could have gone for a Miele Triflex HX2 with a powerage of 272 watts for around 550 euros. It would last longer, is of German making and is less heavy. Or take a Samsung Jet class. Samsung might make shitty televisions, but they make hella good vacuum cleaner. And it's even less heavier.

Jsou hodně dobré ale nechají si za to taky hodně zaplatit. Taky jsme řešili doma podobné dilema zda za to tu cenu dát, nakonec jsme se rozhodli jít do Samsung Jet, hlavně kvůli váze a recenzím a zatím spokojenost (máme necelý rok).

Máme dlažbu a vinyl, ty to vyluxuje úplně v pohodě, pokud to srovnám s klasickým vysavačem co máme tak má vyšší sací výkon s těmi nástavci na podlahu, horší je to se sacím výkonem bez nástavce (jen roura) nebo s těmi štěrbinovými ale nic hrozného. Je to pohodlné že nemusíš běhat pro vysavač a zapojovat ho, prostě sundáš z držáku a vrátíš zpět.

Have a Samsung jet. It is good but you still need a proper vacuum as well. The Samsung I use for quick whizz around and it's great for taking up to our loft bedroom but none of them perform anywhere near as well as a wired vacuum like a Miele S3.  I'd invest more in a proper vacuum then buy a relatively basic cordless one for those quick clean up jobs.