Samsung - Jet 60 Turbo (VS15A6031R1/ET)

Koupil jsem před pár měsíci SAMSUNG VS15A6031R1/GE za 4,7k podle dTest vyšel fajně a já jsem s ním zatím spokojenej. Predpoklam že až mu chcípne baterka tak ji prostě přepájim jako jsem to teď dělal po 3. Letech u Electroluxu. Manželka chtěla Dyson na 13k ale to se mě opravdu zdá jako vyhozený prachy.

I don't recommend Dyson dupes or copies. Cordless vacuums have a lot of drawbacks to be lightweight and get to a certain price. The battery can't be too big or heavy and since the battery is a very expensive component other parts are smaller or cheaper. So I only recommend name brand cordless vacuums that have replaceable batteries and replacement parts available. Sometimes I've seen an LG CordZero A9 and Samsung Jet 60 with basic models under $200. I wouldn't buy anything cheaper than those vacuums because the cheap cordless vacuums break in a year or less and then they're aren't repairable. If you are looking to stay around $100 I recommend looking at the corded Kenmore Intution. It's a small upright vacuum with hepa bags. It's light and since the motor sits near the wheels the handle weight is actually less than a cordless vacuum. Many of the Kenmore Intuitions range from $150-180. There's a cheaper Intuition BU3040 that removes the liftaway mode and usually goes on sale for around $120-130. There's a cheaper Vacmaster UB0302E $100-120 this is same vacuum as the Intuition BU3040 but with less tools and bags included. Another option is to look at the corded stick vacuums. Not the $30 Bissell Featherweights, but the Dyson dupes with a cord. They're even cheaper than the cordless Dyson dupes. Since they are corded they don't have run time limits or battery issues. If you get a corded stick vacuum buy replacement filters to have as backup because they don't stock replacement parts for long. The downside of a corded stick vacuum is it isn't as powerful or have the capacity of an upright and you don't get any cordless convenience. They usually don't stand up and still have a heavy handle weight.

The LG CordZero and Samsung Jet are regarded as great alternatives to the Dyson V15. Many offer 2 batteries and a charging stand for less than the price of a V15. I believe there are a lot of features on the V15 that are showy but do not improve the performance like the particle sensor and laser. You could get a Dyson V11 for the similar cleaning performance as the V15 but without the more expensive screen. The Submarine mop attachment on the V15 is not comparable to regular vacuum/mops, the Submarine does not vacuum and mop at the same time and it doesn't suck up any liquid, it just rolls it up. What kind of flooring do you have? If you have mostly carpets I would recommend cordless versions of upright vacuums like the Hoover Onepwr Hepa+/Oreck Cordless and the Simplicity Freedom/Riccar Supralite Cordless. These are battery powered versions of upright vacuums that have much better carpet cleaning than regular cordless stick vacuums like the Dyson, LG, and Samsung. Also don't buy any Sharks, they're terrible, they break, and they're unrepairable.

The LG CordZero and Samsung Jet have filtration like this. The Dreame vacuums do on the cheaper side. Since you are in the U.K. you do have the Henry Quick Cordless and Henry Quick Corded. The bag/pods offer great filtration and avoid bagless mess.

Ik heb die ook maar weet niet of ik er tevreden van ben. Het is wat mij betreft een kutding met weinig zuigkracht en een kleine batterij, maar dat zijn ze misschien allemaal. Ik weet niet wat ik er van mag verwachten. Tegelijkertijd pak ik hem wel vaak tov onze gewone stofzuiger dus zo slecht is hij nou ook weer niet 🤷. In elk geval zou ik niet nog een keer die 300 of hoe veel was het uitgeven en gewoon een 2e gewone stofzuiger voor de bovenverdieping kopen.

They cost around 699 euros, with 280 watts of power. You could have gone for a Miele Triflex HX2 with a powerage of 272 watts for around 550 euros. It would last longer, is of German making and is less heavy. Or take a Samsung Jet class. Samsung might make shitty televisions, but they make hella good vacuum cleaner. And it's even less heavier.

Jsou hodně dobré ale nechají si za to taky hodně zaplatit. Taky jsme řešili doma podobné dilema zda za to tu cenu dát, nakonec jsme se rozhodli jít do Samsung Jet, hlavně kvůli váze a recenzím a zatím spokojenost (máme necelý rok).

Máme dlažbu a vinyl, ty to vyluxuje úplně v pohodě, pokud to srovnám s klasickým vysavačem co máme tak má vyšší sací výkon s těmi nástavci na podlahu, horší je to se sacím výkonem bez nástavce (jen roura) nebo s těmi štěrbinovými ale nic hrozného. Je to pohodlné že nemusíš běhat pro vysavač a zapojovat ho, prostě sundáš z držáku a vrátíš zpět.

Ik heb samsung jet en ben best tevreden over. Geen klachten afgelopen 5 jaar

My jsme si teda koupili samsung jet a moc spokojena nejsem. I kdyz by si to melo umet poradit s vlasy, imrvere je to ucpany tak, ze to ani nevysava. Za ty prachy sme mohli mit i vytiraciho robota. A ta funkce laseru taky nefunguje jak inzeruji. Ponozku to odtahne s sebou.

I love my samsung jet!! The self emptying function rocks

Got a husky, I use the Samsung jet cordless. It works well but no cordless will ever match a plug in. My dyson plug in vacuum will fill up after I already vacuumed my carpet. But for non carpeted areas its wonderfull. It even has a pet hair tool for my couch and car.

Samsung jets have poorly made circuit boards that are known to break and replacing it is…. Well good luck unfortunately. They’re fine when they work… If you need a 2nd battery, the Triflex gives that option, or there is the Riccar R65 which is great at its price - can run 2 batteries. TBH, I really haven’t had any complaints with run time from people though. The DuoFlex easily has the best connections as well. Everything about that thing is built good - just wish it had the 2nd battery option though. I give customers deals on just the handheld part, as that can act as a 2nd battery then. It’s priced really well IMO relative to the build quality, so I can still justify the cost personally.