Archer BE230

I bought the **TP-Link Archer BE3600** for **$179.00** after price-matching at Officeworks. I’m on a Superloop 500 Mbps plan, and it’s working really well for my needs. I wouldn’t spend $300 on an overpriced router wheny you are not paying for a super high-speed internet—this one does the job perfectly. Just dont get confused by internet lol cause i was in the same boat as you! ALSO ASUS IS OVERRATED FOR THE PRICE.

I like my tplink archer be230

I've been pretty happy with my tp-link be230

If the BE230 is in AP mode then all devices connected to it are being bridged to the main ISP router's network. It'll give the guests regular IP addresses on your main subnet so no isolation from main network. Easiest option would be to check if your ISP router supports gateway/modem mode (as u/lordwerwath suggested) and then use the BE230 to run both your main network and a separate guest network, all in one unit. Definitely get a second opinion on this part, but if your ISP router doesn't support gateway/modem mode, you can go down the double NAT route where you place the BE230 in router mode (instead of AP mode) and plug it into your main router. Devices will be separated on their own private subnet, but only to a limited degree, as devices on the guest network will still be able to see devices on the main network, and not the other way around. (Not totally sure on this part, so please correct me if I'm wrong)

I had a $500 TPLINK AXE 16000 high end super crazy router provided by my fiber company, the thing was a piece of garbage and dropped connection for a few seconds every 10 minutes after about a year. Made gaming impossible. I went on Amazon and bought [this $90 WIFI 7 router](https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DC99N2T8) and have had zero issues and just as good coverage in my home (1650sqft). It supports mesh, although I've never used it so can't comment there. My main point is that buying the expensive router doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be any better.

I have ARCHER BE230 and works fine with Quest 3. The latency between PC and the headset is usually below 50ms.

I bought this router a few months ago and am satisfied both with range and speed. Only thing that MLO appears to be broken or is just a gimmick. Across my house approximetly 15m (around 50 feet) lengthwise, 5GHz is way faster than MLO.

Not sure what model you had, but are you certain you weren't trying to set the WAN DNS instead of the DHCP DNS? I've used Pi-Hole with the TP-Link AX1500 and currently TP-Link AXE75 with no such issues. Additionally, I've set a friend up with a TP-Link BE3600 which also allows for setting the DNS server.

I just "upgraded" to that AX3000. After installing it I realized it has nothing special. No VLAN tagging support, can't install OpenWRT and it has the same WiFi signal than my ISP router. Not sure, but I think the BE3600 suffers the same weaknesses, but with WiFi 7 support.

I just "upgraded" to that AX3000. After installing it I realized it has nothing special. No VLAN tagging support, can't install OpenWRT and it has the same WiFi signal than my ISP router. Not sure, but I think the BE3600 suffers the same weaknesses, but with WiFi 7 support.

I have the be3600. I've been using it with 1gb fiber and have had no issues with it. I've been using it since April. I didn't do anything fancy with it, just plugged in my internet, and my other network cables and it works fine.

I have the be3600. I've been using it with 1gb fiber and have had no issues with it. I've been using it since April. I didn't do anything fancy with it, just plugged in my internet, and my other network cables and it works fine.