Saucony - Peregrine 11

I've run in Peregrines (11, 12, & 13) and I find the Inov-8 Trailfly (The Standard. Not the Speed. Not the Zero (if you're in the UK)) to ride similarly. They're a 6mm drop instead of a 4mm, but they feel very similar under-foot. The mid-sole is on the firmer-side, but with decent energy return. They have a rock-plate. Grip is great where I run (dry, hardpack, a little rocky). Runs on pavement just fine since the lugs aren't extremely aggressive. They have a relatively wide forefoot. I'd size up at least half size, maybe a full size. I've got about 500 miles on mine, uppers are perfectly intact, but horrendously stained because I bought the white ones since I found them deeply discounted. Outsole is more worn, but still completely intact and functional.

Peregrine 11 is good for your needs but buying models from more than 3 years ago can be risky as the glue starts to break down, specially if they weren't stored in an appropriate place.

I have a pair of 11s. To me they are too firm and I've retired them to hiking shoes. Not sure if the mid-sole always felt that firm or if age and 200 miles of running firmed them up a bunch. Personally I avoid shoes more then two generations old because there's not good data on how age impacts foam and I have enough shoes that I know it'll take me at least a year to wear it anything I buy now.

I love the shoe but the rocks and rough terrain in AZ just rip them apart.

I had a Saucony Peregrine 11 which on my third outing the sole began to break (especially the protuberances on the sole) I asked for my money back since it was only 15 km. I recently wanted to try a saucony peregrine 13 again, I have run a little with them but so far the sole looks good

I feel like they peaked with the 11 and then the models since then have been a lot worse. They used to be my god-tier shoe for fast hiking—they got me up and down Half Dome’s polished granite with zero slips—now the rubber seems far less useful.

I honestly loved my Peregrine 11s. They weren't the lightest shoes around but they were very good. They shaved a lot of weight on the 12s which seemed to be in the upper because I went through 2 pairs of them, ripping through both uppers after only a couple hundred km. The 15s just came out which may be the best version of the shoe yet.

I usually lean towards lower stack and firmer cushioning shoes with at least 4.5+ mm lugs/tread. There used to be more commonly available soft ground options like the Altra King MT and Saucony Peregrine 13 ST but these may be harder to find. I've had good results with the regular Peregrine in the sense that they work better than high stack shoes like the Speedgoat, but they aren't optimized for soft ground.

I loved the older Peregrine's but the new ones quality is absolute trash. I've moved over to Nnormals and don't see myself going back. Tomirs will probably fit your foot best, Kjerag is more "like" the Peregrine IMO (stiffer foam, lighter) but you may find them tight. Good luck!

I loved the older Peregrine's but the new ones quality is absolute trash. I've moved over to Nnormals and don't see myself going back. Tomirs will probably fit your foot best, Kjerag is more "like" the Peregrine IMO (stiffer foam, lighter) but you may find them tight. Good luck!

Ive been happy with the saucony peregrine esp now that the sole eliminated the portion which allowed for rock intrusion. Can anyone provide insight between these and asics?