LG 34GS95QE-B

Running these analyses costs money. Buy through my links to help keep lights on! I may get a small commission.

Overall

#23 in

Ultrawide Monitors

according to Reddit Icon Reddit

Sentiment score70% positive
31
7
6
Last updated: May 1, 2026

Reddit Reviews

Reddit Icon404Page_Not_Found404
5 months ago

Is it just me or are these prices insane? I snagged the 34GS95QE-B for about €680 last September in Spain. I checked the prices now on Amazon.es and the same model is sitting at €720.

Reddit Iconamick1995
12 months ago

I went from the aoc cu34g2xp to an LG 34gs95qe and agree with what you said. The aoc was a decent monitor, I didn’t notice any smearing or other issues VA’s can have. The LG is beautiful, OLED looks so much better. I personally love the 800r curve it has as well.

Reddit IconArci996
4 months ago

I’ve seen the LG ultragear 34GS95QE for as low as 600€ new, it’s what I’m using now and I’d strongly reccomend it.

Reddit Iconbig-peetard
12 months ago

I had the same concerns and I love my 34GS95QE

Reddit IconBloodwalker09
8 months ago

Personally I’m very satisfied with my LG 34GS95QE. Idk if it’s available to you and for what price but in Germany it’s pretty cheap right now, has great picture quality. It’s matte, I also have the 27GS95QE which is the same monitor but not ultrawide. And honestly I have the feeling matte is the way to go. People talk, people sometimes sneeze and what not. It’s impossible to not have any kind of dirt on your screens and might it be very small. Good luck keeping this glossy screens clean. At least for the Alienware I heard it’s nearly impossible to keep clean.

8 months ago

I've been asking myself the same question over the past few weeks, as I also wanted to upgrade from my 27-inch 16:9 1440p OLED monitor to something larger. In the end, I opted for a 1440p monitor in 21:9 format. On the one hand, because the pixel density is high enough for me; after all, a 34-inch ultrawide is basically just a wider 27-inch monitor. With the 39-inch or even 45-inch devices with 1440p, I felt there was too great a risk that the significantly lower pixel density would make it too pixelated for me personally, as I don't sit very far away from my monitor. I also have a 77-inch 4K OLED in my living room, where I can play in 4K with a large sound system if I feel like it, which I rarely do, but I do enjoy doing so with some immersive story games. Reconnecting the PC is quick and easy, and I'm still exploring the possibilities of how I could potentially stream in 4K HDR from my PC to the TV. Back to my personal experience with 21:9. I'm currently playing Metal Gear Solid Delta, and although it doesn't have official support, cutscenes in particular sometimes feel like they were made for 21:9. When I pause during a cutscene, the edges on the left and right are blacked out again, but you can still see the scene behind the menu. What can I say, at least in this game I feel like I'm missing out with 16:9. It's also ideal for strategy games. I played a session of Anno on my 21:9 and after watching a stream of the same game in 16:9, the menu suddenly seemed so cluttered and cramped to me. It's clear that for the optimal 21:9 experience, you ideally need the developers to implement it (well) or for there to be online mods that supplement it. Most of the time, this is very easy to do, and I'm the type of person who likes to tinker around digitally anyway. As an absolute backup, games always run in 16:9 and then have black borders on the right and left, but thanks to OLED, this is only half as bad as I imagine it would be with classic LED LCD monitors. But if that's a no-go, you'd be better off with classic 16:9. After a week of 21:9, my personal dream is a 5k2k 21:9 monitor such as the LG 45GX950, but this is currently too expensive for me (currently just under €1750 in Germany). But I am more than satisfied with my LG 34GS95QE, not only with the panel but also with the image format, and I'm sure I'll be very happy with it for the next few years. And if in a few years OLEDs like the LG 45GX950 (or its successor) are available for less than €1,000, then that will definitely be my next upgrade. Sorry for the long text, but because my exploration of this very question is still so fresh and I have literally just finished a session of MGS: Delta, I just wanted to share my experience here.

Reddit IconBrosDeadAgain
11 months ago

Absolutely love my LG 34GS95QE, but it's a constant reminder that I now also need to upgrade my second monitor to OLED.

Reddit IconcheswickFS
about 1 month ago

As some of you might know from my comments in Discord and elsewhere, I've been actively using OLED ultrawide monitors for about 4 years now, tested a whole bunch of them, and I'm still running the AW3423DW and AW3423DWF as my daily drivers to this day. So when the first Gen 5 QD-OLED ultrawides started shipping, I obviously had to get my hands on one. I've had the MSI X36 on my desk for over a month now and I think I can give a proper assessment at this point. Quick setup context because it matters: RTX 4080 Super, VESA mounted, sitting about 70cm from the screen. I use it mixed, productivity during the day (code, documentation, lots of text), gaming in the evenings and some HDR content here and there. [Viewing Distance](https://preview.redd.it/78cj563caurg1.jpg?width=3024&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75f3d18f3bda9e8310c7b971b87f552d5fe00180) **The panel and why Gen 5 is actually a huge improvement** The V-Stripe RGB subpixel layout is what changed the most for me. I did my usual side by side text test on day one (different font sizes, ClearType on/off, light and dark backgrounds) and there's just nothing there anymore. No green magenta fringing on text edges, no need for any ClearType workarounds. https://preview.redd.it/dbjqh09jmurg1.png?width=1251&format=png&auto=webp&s=fcca0b547e7c0de9d250da85fdc6773ae08c55ff I use my AW3423DW daily for 12+ hours, including heavy text work, and the fringing on the old triangular subpixel layout was always a bit of an annoyance. Not enough to make me ditch the monitor because the image quality was too good for that, but enough to notice it every day. So I'm genuinely glad that's finally over with Gen 5. What also hits you right away is the “DarkArmor” coating. My office has a big window on the left side, and where my old QD-OLED panel always had that annoying magenta shine on dark areas in daylight, now it's often just black but with full sunshine on it or in weird angles as in the picture below you will still see this magenta shine. The coating apparently absorbs ambient light more effectively than the old one. The difference is immediately noticeable in real life. https://preview.redd.it/0k4opbrpcurg1.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6cfb1fa5f2697f9d295115f3324109e4b273d43f **Image quality is what actually matters in daily use** I always test monitors for at least a few weeks in regular use before I even start caring about measurement charts, because how it actually feels on your desk tells you more than a Delta E table ever will. And the first impression here was damn good. Colors pop, but not in that over the top "Samsung vivid" kind of way. Just rich and natural. For the hard numbers I'll point you to the [DisplayNinja review](https://www.displayninja.com/msi-mpg-341cqr-qd-oled-x36-review/) since they did proper instrument based measurements. They got 1295 nits peak at 1% APL, around 507 nits sustained in True Black 500 mode, and roughly 306 nits in SDR with no ABL at all. That last part lines up exactly with what I noticed in daily use, the brightness stays rock solid no matter what's on screen. No dimming when you scroll through a bright document, no shifting when you switch between windows. For productivity that's a massive win. If you want the full technical breakdown, check their review directly. In HDR mode ABL is obviously still there, that's just OLED physics and there's no way around it. But MSI built in a "Uniform Luminance" feature where you can adjust 14 individual brightness points on the HDR curve. That's surprisingly granular and for HDR enthusiasts who like to fine tune things. Three HDR modes to choose from: 1.True Black 500 (best EOTF tracking) 2.Peak 1300 (maximum highlight brightness) 3.EOTF Boost, since the new FW seems to offer the best balance of both. **360 Hz do you need it?** Honestly, coming from 175 Hz on my AW3423DW, the jump to 360 Hz is very noticeable. Way more so than going from, 120 to 175hz was for me with the upgrade from the AW3420DW to the AW3423DW. Everything just feels buttery smooth, in CS2 at 300+ fps the difference to 175 Hz was immediately obvious, in something like Crimson Desert you'll never get there anyway. Input lag wasn’t noticeable for me. Zero ghosting in the UFO test, zero overshoot. Nothing to complain about here but there aren’t many games where u can reach such numbers. Important technical bits over DP 2.1a you get 3440x1440@360Hz without DSC at 8bit. Over HDMI 2.1 you do need DSC for full refresh rate. USB-C also does full resolution at 360 Hz plus 98W power delivery for laptop charging. Adaptive Sync works out of the box, VRR range is 48-360 Hz. G-Sync runs in compatible mode and I can confirm it works perfectly fine with my 4080 Super, no flickering in terms of blanking and sync drops, VRR flickering will always be a thing on OLED panels which you can only help yourself with by turning VRR off. No official NVIDIA certification but in 2026 with adaptive sync this isnt a dealbreaker for me anymore. **What's not great** **110 PPI.** This is and remains the elephant in the room for 34 inch UWQHD. If you're coming from a 4K display, you will notice the difference in text sharpness. Windows scaling at 100% is just barely okay at around 70cm viewing distance, but if you primarily edit text and want pixel perfect crispness, the 110 PPI will bother you. That's not an MSI problem, it affects the entire 34 inch UWQHD class. But it needs to be said. **The AI features are meh.** AI Brightness and AI Light Sensor sound cool on paper. There's a sensor in the monitor that checks 5 times per second whether you're still sitting there. In practice though, the automatic brightness adjustment reacts more or less unreliably and it's more annoying than helpful. Both are disabled by default and honestly I turned them off after two days of testing and never looked back. **Gaming Intelligence software** was still buggy for me but I have to say that I got a press version so that’s nothing I would worry about on the consumer side. The joystick OSD works great though and is easy to navigate, so not a dealbreaker. **No built-in speakers.** Doesn't bother me at all, but for some people that's a consideration. **Uniformity:** Up to 20% brightness dropoff in the corners on full white. That's typical for OLED and barely noticeable in daily use, but you'll see it on test patterns if you go looking. Some slight vertical banding on very dark greys, also standard OLED stuff. **How it stacks up against the competition** Compared to the AW3425DW (QD-OLED, 240 Hz, triangular subpixel layout), the X36 brings three real improvements: no more text fringing, 360 instead of 240 Hz, and about 30% more HDR peak brightness at comparable APL windows. The roughly 300$ premium is justified in my opinion, but only if at least two of those three points matter to you. If you already own the Alienware and mainly game on it, you don't necessarily need to upgrade. The W-OLED panels in the ASUS PG34WCDM and LG 34GS95QE use an RWBG subpixel layout, which still produces noticeable fringing on text due to the reversed subpixel order and the extra white subpixel. They also top out at 240 Hz and around 1200 nits measured peak. Gen 5 QD-OLED with its proper V-Stripe RGB layout is a clear step up here, both in text clarity and HDR headroom. The Acer Predator X34 F3 and ASUS PG34WCDN use the exact same panel by the way. Acer costs 100$ more at 1200$, ASUS pricing is still TBA. That makes the MSI the cheapest confirmed Gen 5 ultrawide on the market right now at 1099$. **Burn-in the eternal question** The tandem OLED architecture is supposed to reduce the risk by about 30% compared to previous generations. OLED Care 3.0 includes pixel shift, multi logo detection, and a panel refresh interval that's been extended to 24 hours (up from 16) or after 4 hours of cumulative use. The 3 year warranty explicitly covers burn-in damage. Realistically I obviously can't say anything about long term behavior after a month. But the protective measures are more comprehensive than any previous generation, and the warranty gives you peace of mind for at least three years. **Price** 1099$ or roughly 1299€ is not cheap. But for what you get here Gen 5 QD-OLED without fringing, 360 Hz, 1300 nits HDR peak, DP 2.1a, USB-C with 98W PD, completely fanless passive cooling. Two years ago you would have paid more for less. **tl;dr** Gen 5 QD-OLED finally kills text fringing, the MSI X36 is currently the cheapest way to get it and delivers in basically every category. 110 PPI remains the only real compromise. If that doesn't bother you, this is the best 34 inch ultrawide you can buy right now.

Reddit Iconchewwydraper
about 2 months ago

I usually hate matte displays but recent mattes I’ve used (LG 34GS, Samsung G60D) have been a lot better. I’ll take modern matte over semi-gloss, but definitely nothing beats the glassy gloss of my LG C1.

Rankings by Use Case

Top recommendations from others in the same boat

Other Reddit Recommendations: